European Jews Claim to Be Oppressed while Making Demands of Christianity

I don’t believe in any conspiracies, including Jewish conspiracies to destroy Christianity, unless I can see it for myself. There’s plenty enough of those to keep me busy. Here’s the latest:

Jewish leaders call for new editions of the Bible and the Koran to carry trigger warnings highlighting anti-Semitic passages

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6421233/Jewish-leaders-call-religious-texts-carry-warnings-highlighting-anti-Semitic-passages.html

By James Wood, 23 November 2018

Jewish leaders are calling for new editions of the Bible and Koran to carry warning messages which highlight anti-Semitic passages in the holy texts.

The recommendations have been made in a new document called “An End to Antisemitism! A Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism..

It was produced following an international conference organised by the European Jewish Congress, at which academics gathered to discuss how prejudice and discrimination can be tackled.

Obviously, by forcing the rest of the world to speak well of you by means of whatever threats, coercions and mindfucks you can impose. There’s no better way to show how kind and trustworthy your people are! A wiser people would consider their own behavior first.

This sort of thing is why Jews are living proof that money can’t buy love.

The document reads: ‘Translations of the New Testament, the Qur.an and other Christian or Muslim literatures need marginal glosses, and introductions that emphasize continuity with Jewish heritage of both Christianity and Islam and warn readers about antisemitic passages in them.

Okay. The new subtitle for the Holy Bible is now “Why God’s chosen people murdered Him when He claimed they weren’t nice people”. That lets everybody know what’s inside!

‘While some efforts have been made in this direction in the case of Christianity, these efforts need to be extended and made consistent in both religions.’

There are several themes in the New Testament that have come under fire for their use as justification for anti-Semitic attitudes.

These include the blame of Jews for the death of Jesus and the seemingly stubborn nature of the Jewish people and their disloyalty to God.

Let’s retry that sentence. These include the blame of Jews for the death of Jesus, even though the Jews claim Jesus deserved execution to this day, and the seemingly stubborn nature of the Jewish people and their disloyalty to God, known collectively as the Old Testament. They would have to put a trigger warning on Moses coming down the mountain with the Ten Commandments. Golden calf, anybody?

We would have to get rid of the entire Bible to appease these chuckleheads. Notice they aren’t even accusing the Bible of being wrong. It just doesn’t make them look good… something it has in common with their current behavior.

While there are some negative remarks about Jews in the Koran, and negative portrayals of the people.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has previously spoken of how religious texts can be exploited or misinterpreted to promote discriminatory attitudes.

Wait, is the Archbishop Jewish? What was he doing there? No doubt explaining that God’s chosen people murdering God is a fantastic illustration of the human condition…right? Right?

Caption: The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has previously spoken of how theological teachings have in the past been used to spread anti-Semitism. He spoke of how it had ‘infected the body of the Church’

Is that pedoface?

Yeah, about 75% pedo. It’s not actually a common face type but wow, it keeps turning up in the halls of power these days.

Writing in a collection of essays published in 2016, he said: ‘It is a shameful truth that, through its theological teachings, the church, which should have offered an antidote, compounded the spread of this virus.

‘The fact that anti-Semitism has infected the body of the Church is something of which we as Christians must be deeply repentant. We live with the consequences of our history of denial and complicity.’

The document, which was produced by academics including Dina Porat and Lawrence H. Schiffman, also calls on all antisemitic texts and passages in the heritage of Christianity and Islam ‘to be identified and rejected’.

Other recommendations include religious leaders and thinkers ‘publicly denouncing as unholy writ’ canonical or quasi-canonical writings of religious anti-Semites.

The justification for these changes, the documents states, is because divine messages are always communicated through human beings and therefore subject to error.

In a more civilized age, the Archbishop would have been burned at the stake for that lie. The justification doesn’t even make rational sense. Why would God, if He bothered to communicate with us, not care to be understood?

It reads: ‘God.s revelation is thus marred by human fallibility. Beginning with the New Testament, divine revelation expresses itself in Christian holy texts that also express a form of hatred.

‘The manifestations of this hatred resulted in a tradition of antisemitism that gave moral legitimacy to crimes against the Jewish people, the epitome of which is the Shoah.’

We know we didn’t understand God correctly because what He said makes the Jews look bad? I know these fools went through seminary learning about Judeo-Christ but this is Judeo-Instead-Of-Christ. Perhaps that’s what they were always working towards?

God’s dim opinion of the Jews throughout Scripture is one of the reasons I believe He wrote it. Had it been a purely man-made document, the Jews would have said only good things about themselves. Just like they’re trying to do right now, in fact. SJWs aren’t the only group who can regret having ever been honest and decent people.

Other areas highlighted, following the conference, include addressing anti-Semitism online and within research organisations and academic institutions.

This includes ensuring internet search engines privilege positive depictions of Judaism and accurate descriptions of the history of anti-Semitism.

Do they own Google or does Google own them? Either seems possible.

Academics have been reacting to suggested recommendations laid out in the documents.

Dr Christine Joynes, a theology lecturer at Oxford, told The Times that she had ‘some sympathy’ over the suggestion of an annotated bible.

But said: ‘The whole Bible needs a health warning to read it through the right critical lens and in historical context.’

Pastor Gunner of the United States underscored the need for such measures.

He said: “You bagel dogs murdered Christ because you’re the children of the devil, and you prove you’re still the children of the devil with this very document at this very conference on this very day… trying to alter two thousand years of history just to protect your delicate collective ego from the light of truth.”

While Muhammad Abdel Haleem, professor of Islamic Studies at the University of London, and also speaking to The Times said that the Koran is entirely negative towards Jews.

He said: ‘If someone wants to get involved in antisemitism or anti-Islamic behaviour, they will do it whether or not you add warnings and footnotes.’

Oops, one of those academics shouldn’t have been italicized. But y’know, all three came pretty close to saying the same thing. A female theologian, a Londonistan imam and a crank from Commiefornia each got closer to the truth than the Archbishop! For shame, Archbishop Welby.

If the Jews of Europe are upset that antisemitism is rising then maybe they should help us white Goyim reverse the immivasion. That would do much more to improve their public image than deplatforming the Crucifixion from social media.