Reactor Officer Snowflake

The fuss over Warhorn Media’s interview with Dalrock is dying down, at least for me. Everybody’s had their chance to speak and matters have devolved into each side doing their own theater. It was interesting that Pastor Tim Bayly came along and weighed in, however, because his defense of a old debate point actually made him look worse today. Because this is a separate issue from the actual interview, I make it a post on my blog. Quoting Bayly from the following link:

I like good back-and-forth, but not ever anonymously.particularly when for fifteen years I have suffered much for the Name of the Lord Jesus and His Words and know how privileged I am for doing so and how much strength it lends to the work to which all believers are called.

Bayly claims to be a super-Christian survivor of the front lines of spiritual war. A dubious claim for any clergyman with a pension and book deal but he gives an example:

…At the same time as I was writing, a student at IU decided to go into the Navy as an officer responsible for nuclear reactors. I loved her and told her she should not do so. We’re still friends and she’s always known I think she was not obeying God in this. Full stop.

This is just one of many, many examples of my fulfilling my responsibility as husband, father, and pastor to say “no” to women, and rebuke them.

I agree with Bayly that Snowflake did evil in the sight of God. Original Sin’s curse upon Eve was that she would envy men their “male privilege”, to use modern terminology, and Reactor Officer is a top-status job in the Navy. She’s obviously feral and seeking authority over men, not to mention almost certainly unqualified for that kind of highly technical work.

God does not want a woman to have authority over men. That’s an ironclad rule for the Church and the exceptions permitted in the secular world, for example Lydia the cloth merchant and widows continuing their husband’s business affairs, are not comparable to a military officer’s power of life and death over his troops. It’s not acceptable to believe God hates female leadership in the Church and approves of it everywhere else. But how to handle Snowflake’s rebellion against male headship?

Bayly: “God doesn’t want you to do that.”

Snowflake: “I refuse to obey God!”

Bayly: “I still love you, just like Jesus does! Let’s be friends.”

Beloved Spear: October 2010

Pastor GunnerQ: “God doesn’t want you to do that.”

Snowflake: “I refuse to obey God!”

GunnerQ: “We’re done, you disobedient witch! How dare you claim to be a Christian yet live as God’s enemy! I will have you publicly shamed. Don’t put one foot in my church ever again.”

See the difference? One of us acts like God is Real and the other acts like Love is God. This is why Churchianity is utter, total filth. It won’t ever tell a woman no and even when the word “no” is actually spoken, consequences are prohibited.

I don’t care about Bayly authoring a General Assembly statement in 2002 or whenever. People can change over fifteen years. By his example today, however, Pastor Tim Bayly is as Cuck as he ever was. He should have read the riot act to Snowflake, then when she proceeded in feminist rebellion against God, held her up as a bad example to the general Church and sent her a courtesy link to guarantee humiliation.

Biblical Precedent, Mister Oedipus of 1 & 2 Corinthians.

Pastor Bayly rebuked a woman for disobeying God and when she didn’t change her evil behavior, bragged about still being friends with her.

I’ll end with this quote from the same link:

One last thing: for fifteen years I’ve been online saying that the only thing the feminists have given men is the right to cry, and Jesus already gave us this right.

The definitive behavior of Churchians is self-sabotage. Bayly is probably trying to be funny but saying feminism is useless because Jesus already gave men the right to cry like women is… very consistent with Bayly not laying down the thunder on Reactor Officer Snowflake.

For the sake of God, male humanity, the United States Navy and her own soul, I hope Snowflake washed out of the nuclear program in shame and dishonor.


Charity Starts With False Rape Accusations

The American Psychological Association quickly doubled down on the heels of its “toxic masculinity” discovery by helping a professional Trump hater equate charity with political activism. Free money never came with so many strings attached!

American Psychological Foundation Establishes Grant Honoring Christine Blasey Ford

Press Release, 23 January 2019

WASHINGTON . The American Psychological Foundation has launched a fund in honor of Christine Blasey Ford, PhD, to support research by graduate students and early career psychologists on understanding and treating individuals who have experienced traumatic events such as sexual assault, sexual harassment or rape.

Ford is a prominent psychologist who testified before Congress last year that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her when they were teenagers.

So much wrong crammed into a single sentence! Ford is a nobody who told Congress but not police that she might have humped a man who might have been Kavanaugh and was so traumatized by it that she said nothing for decades until Orange Man nominated a potential anti-abortionist to SCOTUS.

Deep Stater: “You went to the same school as this man. Did you ever have sex with him?”

Ford: “Probably. I fucked through most of my yearbook but the drugs made keeping score hard.”

Deep Stater: “We’ll give your dead-end career a huge boost if you say yes to Congress.”

Ford: “Ohmigawd he raaaped me!”

Deep Stater: “SMOKING GUN!!!”

On that note…

.We are honored to launch the Dr. Christine Blasey Ford grant at APF. As more survivors come forward and speak about their abuse, the science of psychology can help us better understand how to address their trauma,. said APF President Terence Keane, PhD, an expert in trauma psychology. .We are grateful to Professor Heidi Feldman and all the donors who made this grant possible and to Dr. Ford for her contributions to the field..

The grant was initiated with a gift generated via a GoFundMe campaign started by Heidi Li Feldman, JD, PhD, a professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center. The idea came to her while watching Ford’s testimony during Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination hearings, she said.

Heidi M. Feldman

Heidi Feldman. Hair is… turbo-frizzy… hoop earrings… jutting chin… those eyes!

.Watching Christine Blasey Ford testify, I realized her professional skills as a collaborator and educator bolstered her ability to participate so effectively. I also feared that she would not be recognized, remembered and valued for her professional achievements as well as her keen sense of civic responsibility,. said Feldman. “As a fellow academic, an endowment of some sort seemed the natural way to commemorate and honor Dr. Ford and make sure her work was recognized, as well as her commitment to our civic good..

An endowment of other people’s money, of course. Here’s the campaign for the interested:

One reason she chose the APF to administer the grant was that its grants often go to early career researchers, who have begun to prove themselves but need to do more work before being able to get larger grants.

Another reason could by the APA’s newfound hatred of sexually normal men.

.Funding researchers at this stage of their careers keeps the pipeline of top-notch work flowing,. she said.

The grant will be part of APF.s Trauma Fund, administered by experts in the field of trauma psychology. Donations are still being accepted through the APF website.

Founded in 1953 as the philanthropic arm of the American Psychological Association, APF is an independent non-profit foundation supporting early career psychologists and graduate students using psychology to solve important problems and improve people’s lives.

Experts in the field of trauma psychology? The only trauma Ford endured was police asking for details. Anyway, Heidi teaches torts at Georgetown School of Law. Out of morbid curiosity, let’s hear from her students, the Future of America:

“At first glance I was really intimidated by Feldman. People have a lot to say about her, and many complaints – but she is an amazing feminist presence on campus. Her cold calls seem tough at first, but that is just because she cares. She is patient, and will stick with a student until they truly get it. Quirky, and inspirationally unapologetic.”

1 found this useful, 14 did not.

“Her goofy humor is entertaining, but the schtick loses its charm once you realize that you’ll be teaching Torts to yourself (DON’T follow her ridiculous advice to not use supplements). She doesn’t answer emails, she’s scatterbrained, and – whether intentional or just a product of being out of touch – she hides the ball and gives bad study advice.”

10 to 2. Somebody isn’t taking her pills like Doctor Peterson said to!

“Worst professor I’ve ever had. It’s not about if you have thick skin or not. She doesn’t teach law & she’s crazy! Focuses on insignificant facts (wastes time with students acting them out. Even had a student barking like a dog). The only good teaching that came from her class was from her TA. You definitely won’t learn negligence. Should be fired!”

11 to 2.

“She’s great. Many can’t handle her sarcastic sense of humor but if you have thick skin you’ll be fine. If you pay attention you will know negligence better than anyone on the planet and you’ll learn to think like a lawyer. Oh and she’s a great dancer!”

0 to 14.

Wikipedia has little biographical data. Broadening the search:

Heidi Li Feldman is Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center, with a courtesy appointment in the Philosophy Department at Georgetown University. She has written major articles on tort law and on legal ethics. Her scholarly expertise includes the U.S. civil justice system more generally. Currently, Dr. Feldman’s scholarship focuses on how and whether U.S. cities and states can protect civil rights and strengthen civil society. Beyond the academy, Dr. Feldman is politically active in the in the effort to resist Donald Trump and those who enable him.

A Georgetown Law professor can openly commit sedition? Tenure must be nice.

Dr. Feldman seeks to bring her knowledge of U.S. law, politics and history to a broad public and to bring a grassroots perspective to the legal academy. Dr. Feldman regularly speaks to U.S. and foreign press on topics ranging from U.S. gun regulation efforts to women’s support for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 candidacy to political efforts to oppose the current Republican agenda. She has been quoted by the New York Times, the Washington Post, Reuters, Bloomberg, and CBS News; extensive interviews with her have aired on CBC (Canadian) radio and television.

Hillary Clinton loves her. Her paying students hate her.

Dr. Feldman is active on Twitter. She helped start the “Grab Your Wallet” boycott of retailers selling Trump brands and she raised consciousness about the silencing of Sen. Elizabeth Warren during the debate over Jeff Sessions. nomination as Attorney General. Dr. Feldman mentors progressive Georgetown law students interested in running for office, especially at the state and local level, and students interested in staffing such campaigns. She is developing a series of workshops for such students, a co-curricular program she intends to serve as a model for other law schools.

She’s a Deep State talent scout.


Legal: tort law, U.S. civil justice system, compensation law, gun litigation and legislation, lawsuits pending against Trump administration. Special familiarity with suits brought by state attorneys general; habeas corpus petitions related to immigration enforcement; and complaints arising from breach of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is now a sub-specialty of the legal profession!

Politics: current U.S. politics, the interrelationship between state and municipal level political activity and national politics, U.S. political and legal history, political philosophy, governmental and legal ethics. Particular familiarity with law, politics, and history of presidential impeachment in the United States; Democratic Party presidential primary system, presidential nomination system.

Well, we already know that academia is as partisan as black churches.

What’s this “Grab Your Wallet” boycott?

Whoa, its front page is a timeline of Trump-Russia collusion! These people need help and not the 2020 Election kind. Ooh, Zappos is on the list! They’re the Internet retailer that I buy shoes from. Excellent service and effortless return policy so you can try them on AFTER you buy! My Big & Tall readers should accept no substitute. Amazon is also on the list. I don’t think they’ve yet noticed they’re being boycotted.

Here, Feldman talks about Remington using Chapter 11 proceedings to dodge the Sandy Hook lawfare attack. It’s actually good coverage:

Here, Feldman opposes Jeff Sessions for his advocacy of free speech.

Georgetown Law students and faculty protest speech by Attorney General Jeff Sessions

By Debbie Truong, Sarah Larimer and Susan Svrluga, 26 September 2017

Dozens of Georgetown University students gathered Tuesday on the steps of McDonough Hall to protest an address from Attorney General Jeff Sessions that lambasted schools for infringing on students. free-speech rights.

The students were joined by faculty members who initially took a knee and later linked arms.

They took turns speaking into a bullhorn, decrying Sessions, the process the university used to bring him to campus and posing questions they would have asked the attorney general had they been allowed into the event.

.We, the disinvited, find it extraordinarily hypocritical that AG Sessions would lecture future attorneys about free speech on campus while excluding the wider student body,. third-year law student Ambur Smith said into the bullhorn.

Uninvited, not disinvited. Unless security got to take out some trash.

Some of the roughly 100 protesters who gathered outside at Georgetown’s law school wore duct tape over their mouths. They held signs that proclaimed, .DEPORT HATE,. FREE SPEECH IS NOT HATE SPEECH,. and “Sessions is afraid of questions..

Georgetown law professor Heidi Li Feldman was one of about 40 faculty and staff members who joined students on the steps of McDonough Hall.

40 staff, 60 students? That’s a curious ratio. Adults usually behave better than children.

.A law school is a place for people to learn about the deepest principles that undergird our democratic republic. Those principles are trampled upon by Attorney General sessions, in particular, and Donald Trump,. she said. .You cannot invite people who so thoroughly threaten the basic premises of American law to a campus and not speak up if your mission in life is to educate people about the American legal system..

And here’s Professor Feldman Uncensored:

https://medium com/ @HeidiLiFeldman/racism-sexism-xenophobia-misogyny-bigotry-ec6d79196afb

10 June 2016

Racism, sexism, xenophobia, misogyny, bigotry. Because of Donald Trump these terms are now, and will be through November at least, part of American daily life. And not in a good way…not, that is, only to be mentioned as traits, attitudes, sentiments that must be rejected, all the time and every time. The way in which these terms will be mentioned often, it seems, is when various GOP pols try to parse them very closely so as to deny that they apply to their party’s presumptive Presidential nominee. The parsing is certainly annoying…sometimes maddeningly…disingenuous, which is bad enough. But it is also dangerous.

It is is dangerous because it obscures the important issue, which is not whether Trump is a chauvinist, a sexist or a misogynist or whether he is racist or xenophobic. The real issue is that Trump expresses hatefulness and disrespect antithetical to the values that preserve a vibrant pluralistic democratic polity. He gives voice to atavistic, primitive emotions that other, functional members of such a polity work hard to overcome, guard against, and hope will eventually be conquered by an enlightened culture.

Behold, a feminist who admits that all the name-calling is beside the point! Their real problem with Trump is that he’s a threat to the globalist, anti-Christian agenda.

If you agree then there might be some grant money in your future.


Monkey Muzzie

This is probably the last time I’ll discuss Turd Flinging Monkey. Completing his moral degeneration is his acceptance of Islam as I predicted in my previous post on him. A case study of what happens when victory becomes more important than truth. [Heavily formatted by me from transcript.]

The next group I’m going to be addressing is religious traditionalists. … Ideally, I want a society where there is a secular kind of philosophy because one of the problems I see with religion is the supernatural. Because it relies on the existence of the supernatural, once there’s doubt of the supernatural people tend to throw out the baby with the bathwater.

I offer the standard objection to any materialist replacement for religion. If I can profitably violate your philosophy, and escape punishment for doing so, why shouldn’t I?

It really is that simple. If evil is a human-defined concept then it is human-RE-definable. The choice is God or humanism.

For example, in the New Testament Jesus cast out demons from people like the guy who thought he had demons in his body and he cast them into some swine and all that stuff, right? There’s all these stories of these people who are possessed by demons and Jesus cast them out and you know, there’s a lot of there’s a lot of miracles and stuff in the New Testament. In fact, the New Testament relies on the supernatural, the resurrection of Jesus and so forth, this is probably the most important thing to Christianity.

This is true. If God In Heaven isn’t real then we’re screwed. If Jesus didn’t return from the dead then neither will we.

In the current year, we know about things like mental illness, schizophrenia, stuff like that, so if you’re like, “wait a minute, this is just people with mental illness which has probably existed for thousands of years but people didn’t know what mental illness was and it’s not that they were possessed by demons, they were just insane, they had these these problems with their brain.” If you can cure demonic possession with a pill then clearly it’s not demonic possession. Christianity is so reliant on the supernatural that once you lose faith in one supernatural aspect, like Jesus casting out demons, then it’s really easy to throw out your belief in all the supernatural aspects of the Bible like healing the sick and being raised from the dead.

TFM should apply this logic in the reverse. If demon worship keeps turning up even in the Information Age then that’s good evidence of extradimensional Evil that should not be dismissed just because it can’t be viewed in a laboratory. In point of fact, we’ve achieved the astonishing status of a society that builds moon rockets while sacrificing babies to Baal. Literally!

As if some things never change… as if some unseen entity is putting the same whispers in peoples’ skulls in Current Year that it did in 30 AD.

My point is, the downfall of the West is because Christianity is what built Western civilization after the the Dark Ages. If you have a religion that is very reliant on supernatural and then the supernatural gets questioned people have a habit of throwing out the baby with the bathwater. “Well, if this child had epilepsy and wasn’t demonically possessed then that means men and women are equal and communism is a good idea”. It doesn’t sound like it should make sense but when your morals are tied to the supernatural and you question the supernatural, people throw out the morals and they throw out the good with the bad.

How strange that a religion of fairy tales and ignorance was so good at producing truth that it debunked itself while creating the best societies in human history alongside modern technology.

This is why I advocate a secular philosophy rather than a religion, something that instills in people the desire to become their their best self and to aspire to virtue and excellence in beauty. That would be the best solution. I also feel the same way about anarcho-capitalism. It’s a great idea, it’s morally correct, it’ll never work in reality because of human nature.

I’ve come to the same conclusion when it comes to religion. As much as I would love such a secular philosophy, aspiring to beauty and excellence without belief in the supernatural just like anarcho-capitalism is impossible because of human nature. People are far too stupid to accept a secular philosophy… too self-interested and short-sighted.

People are too stupid to be good; therefore, we who understand good should command them what to think? Hardly an original thought.

In fact, I’ve seen this myself. I’ve talked to people who they watch my videos such as “Into the Wasteland” where you have to find your own meaning and purpose and they literally don’t even know where to begin. They knew exactly what I was talking about and they have no problem finding their own meaning their own purpose and, you know, going on that journey and they find great fulfillment and Worth.

I always assumed these guys were talking about breaking the blue pill conditioning. There’s a reason the Manosphere uses Matrix references: reality is not what we have been told it is, for the length of our lives. I hope none of these guys were instead looking for a substitute Goddess to worship.

But, there’s also a lot of people who don’t have the faintest idea of what that looks like or how to do it and they just want someone to tell them what to do. I don’t think they’re stupid, I just think that they have a mentality which doesn’t lend itself to that level of individualism. Like I said, people are sheep. [GQ: Jesus said it first.] They want to follow. Only the man at the top can truly think critically.

Put down the Nietzsche. Step away from the Nietzsche.

Here’s where the paradigm shift comes in. I follow a lot of Nietzsche…


…and philosophy like the ubermensch he mentioned, the herd and the higher man and everything like that. and I originally believed that the problem was herd morality so that if people could reorient their morals, see the herd morality for what it was, a system of control, and aspire to a higher personal morality then they could build their meaning and purpose off of that.

Then, they could find that meaning and purpose which would give their life meaning. They could aspire to be their best selves and and then they wouldn’t need a religion or a political organization or anyone telling them what to do.

He’s not wrong about the herd mentality. Not everybody is a leader; not everybody is a follower. Trying to correct that was possibly his first doomed experiment in Utopianism.

His next doomed experiment will be forcing people to think good thoughts. That can’t be done so the next best thing is forcing people to act good actions. Which is the main difference between Christianity and Islam. Christians are saved by grace because we accept the truth despite persistent evil in our behavior. Muslims are saved by going through the motions of the Five Pillars while secretly believing whatever they want.

A secular philosophy without religion, without the supernatural is simply not going to work. The average person needs their morals and their ideals to be externalized. They are utterly incapable of internalizing a moral system they need. You know how if you try to explain to a child the concept of going to prison and how it’s gonna ruin your life because you gonna be in prison for twenty years and by the time you get out your life’s gonna be effectively over and you’ll never be able to recover, that’s the end of your life, they won’t understand that. They can’t even conceptualize of what that means. But everyone understands an ass-whooping.

The end is people making good decisions. The means is overriding people’s ability to make their own decisions. The problem is obvious. Or not?

I’ve accepted that basically religion is kind of inevitable and it’s the best solution. Again I base everything on what will work not necessarily what I think is ideal we have to do what works first and then apply our ideals in principle second.

TFM proudly fornicates with sexbots but this is the first time I’ve been disgusted by him, watching him choose from a buffet of lies, asking himself which lie will bring him the best result for the least effort. We’re done, TFM. You really should have listened to Misandry Today sounding the alarm over your mental health. Nietzsche is going to get a roommate.

So, how do we create or rather, how do we reform a religion which will work the best? I came up with three ideas and this actually proves why Islam is winning and why Christianity is getting its ass kicked and Judaism is treading water.

Christianity is doing fine, thank you. We remain the only correct religion on the planet. Granted, our popularity is waning, but nothing about Christianity is falsified by a lack of worldly power or prestige.

It’s because of three things. Number one, Islam is the most patriarchal. Patriarchy is what creates successful societies.

BULLSHIT! Look at the Mideast, it’d be a squalid hovel of mud huts if it wasn’t for oil. Muslims haven’t been a net contributor in any other society that’s taken them in, either. Polygamy and despotism are not masculine; that’s what women want. Men want to get the job done, keep what they earn and deal with each other as equals. Excepting, typically, the ones who want to impress women or are straight-up evil.

Christianity is the least patriarchal. Christianity’s absolutely tied itself to feminism and gynocentrism in order to keep their nonprofit status, in order to attract women. If you’re a Christian, you may remember this movement a few years ago, seeker sensitive.

It’s where churches act like the culture, adopting customs and practices and stuff, to try to get people to be comfortable going to church but basically defeating the purpose of church because if you’re just going to be the culture then what’s the point? So anyway, Christianity is losing hard.

Seeker Sensitive is what churches do after they no longer believe Christ has anything to offer humanity. Does TFM not realize that he holds their same position? “Christianity is losing to modern culture, therefore Christianity must be useless.”

Judaism is kind of treading water and then Islam is is just fucking destroying everything.

No, Islam isn’t. The globalists opened the border gates for them and bought them bus tickets in and gave them massive welfare payments and ordered law enforcement to stand down and let them run feral. It’s the globalists who are destroying everything, including their own childrens’ future, that’s how “patriarchal” they are.

Even Judaism is doing better than Islam from the perspective of winning. They leveraged Holocaust guilt into the genocide of all Christian civilization. And look, Israel’s back on the map!

Jesus and Christianity is the most dependent on the supernatural not only because of the resurrection but also because of the gift of the Holy Spirit. Yeah, you have the story of Moses and the Passover and all the miracles in Egypt but there’s no modern equivalent in Judaism to the gift of the Holy Spirit. Jews don’t believe in like modern miracles the way Christians do.

This is curious, an unbeliever objecting to the Holy Spirit’s existence. If a dead guy coming back to life is a deal-breaker then why bother about the other, harder teachings? The answer:

Muhammad himself really didn’t perform any miracles. There’s no supernatural underpinnings there. … The reason why religion is vulnerable is because if you rely on the supernatural and then science comes behind you and disproves a supernatural aspect of your religion for example the boy had epilepsy but in the Bible he had a demon, well, if demonic possession is just mental illness and epilepsy then what else is the Bible lying about?

TFM wants a religion that cannot be disproven because he believes going in that all religion is a lie, Marx’s opiate of the masses. He doesn’t want a religion that might reveal him to be a liar and manipulator by making crazy claims about the supernatural.

Yep, Christianity is a suck choice for THAT.

One benefit of living in this fallen world is you can see the effects of evil upon others without risking your own soul. TFM was fascinating to watch. He started out optimistic and helpful to many people. Then, he chose to believe that human sexuality was a mere appetite and it didn’t matter how the appetite got fed. Now, he believes that the human desire for God is a mere appetite, one that stubbornly won’t go away, and it doesn’t matter how we feed the appetite. Islam is today’s winning religion so why not. We’ll just trade up religions as needed to continue humanity’s self-actualization.

TFM is now a child of the devil, spreading whatever lies he thinks will accomplish his mission. He has proven, by negative example, that humans are not mere animals. It does matter how we feed our appetites.

Man does not live by bread alone.


Trailblazing the Green New Deal

I finally looked up the Green New Deal to have a laugh at Leftoid antics. Leftoids claim there is no God, re-create government to be God and then wonder how God can ever go Broke.

What is the Green New Deal and how would it benefit society?

By Emily Holden, 11 February 2019

So what is the Green New Deal?
The proposal outlines the broad principles of a plan simultaneously to fight inequity and tackle climate change. It does not contain policy details or advocate for specific ways of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. But with a broad brush it aims to make the US carbon-neutral . net zero carbon emissions . in 10 years.

10=8+2. President Leftoid will have 8 years to crash the North American system, then his predecessor will be left holding the bag for midterm elections. Needless to say, North America’s entire power grid is not going to be torn down and rebuilt in 10 years.

The Green New Deal recognizes that transition would require massive change. It endorses ways of ensuring that vulnerable populations . including the poor, people of color, indigenous populations and communities already facing environmental degradation . take part in the planning process and benefit from the green economy.

One notices that Christian white men who like indoor plumbing have no place in this literal New World Order.

Would it end the use of coal, oil and natural gas?
No. But it would aim to offset any remaining greenhouse gas pollution with forests that absorb carbon dioxide, for example.

Here, the Guardian lied outright. Just trust a Commiefornian on this, they intend to gut the infrastructure.

How ambitious is the Green New Deal?
Incredibly ambitious, both on climate change and with its reimagining of society.

The fact that this environmental plan calls for more social engineering than environmental engineering should be very telling.

US climate efforts so far have focused on the power sector, which is probably the easiest to decarbonize. Many states and localities have continued that work even as the federal government ignores climate change.

Yes indeed, many states and localities have followed the blueprint for energy wokeness:

*Promise your dupes constituents that destroying factories and power plants (whose labor unions fund your opponent) is a great way to make money and jobs*

*Ban all local cheap energy*

*Build windmills and solar fields. Skim reelection funds off the grants and subsidies*

*Go on a screaming fit when power interruptions start. Act surprised when your advisors explain that solar panels don’t work at night.*

*Beg neighboring power grids for energy*

*Complain about price gouging*

*Punch a Nazi for laughing at you. Or smiling at you. Or standing around at you.*

Additionally, climate advocates and policy experts across the country have not typically tried to address every contributor to global warming at once or while addressing other societal issues. This kind of system-wide thinking and planning would be difficult to adopt.

Dude, those advocates and experts don’t try to address even China. Biting the Yellow Hand that funds them would indeed be “difficult to adopt”.

The energy shift would require a major investment, as would the social programs highlighted in the Green New Deal. The resolution does not suggest a source for that money.

No shit, Sherlock!

The politics of the plan are also difficult, with Republicans in control of the Senate and the White House vehemently opposed to it, and with some Democrats split over whether it is the right approach.

If not everybody is on board with this total restructuring of North America then maybe we should hold off.

How would it fight climate change?
The goals of the document include a .10-year national mobilization.…

What would the Green New Deal do for people?
The proposal lays out numerous .crises., including declining life expectancy for many Americans, as well as wage stagnation and income inequality.

None of those “crises” are either Green, New, or solvable by any kind of Deal.

The Green New Deal calls for:

a guaranteed job with fair pay, family and medical leave, paid vacations and retirement security

Mo’ money

universal high-quality healthcare

Mo’ money

free higher education

Mo’ money

access to affordable, safe and adequate housing

Mo’ money

stronger labor, workplace health and safety, anti-discrimination, and wage and hour standards

Mo’ money

the clean-up of hazardous waste sites

Fig leaf! We care about the planet!

access to clean water and air, health and affordable food, and nature

Mo’ money

The article ends, so appropriately, with the Guardian begging for money because its ideology is not profitable:

Since you’re here.
. we have a small favour to ask. … The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

Such pure idealism! Such inconvenient reality! Here’s the sad, sick truth: people are okay with journalists being biased if only they’re honest about their biases. I’m okay with the Guardian. First it endorses these totalitarian nationfuckers and then it hits the same roadblock that they will: running out of other peoples’ money.

I bet the Guardian wishes it could force people to give them money.


Kenneth Wayne Thompson: Scientology Is Worse Than Twinkies

The Twinkie Defense worked. Excusing double murder with aggravated circumstances by claiming “Scientology made me do it” did not for Kenneth Wayne Thompson. He would have done better to admit the truth: “my wife made me do it”.

Scientology defense fails as jury returns first-degree murder verdicts in Prescott trial

By Richard Ruelas, 20 February 2019

He tried to convince jurors that his brutal slaying of two people in a Prescott Valley home was understandable when viewed through the lens of his Scientology beliefs.

The jury did not buy it and, after just two hours of deliberation, found Kenneth Wayne Thompson guilty of first-degree murder on Wednesday.

Two hours of deliberation in a double-homicide case? It takes 45 minutes for the jury to pick a foreman and find the donuts. Kenny should have just pleaded guilty and been done with life.

Jurors will return on Friday to begin the sentencing phase, said Shelly Bacon, a spokeswoman for Yavapai County Superior Court. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty in the case.

Thompson.s attorneys used Scientology as part of a bid to spare their client the first-degree murder conviction and the possibility of a death sentence. They argued that Scientology explained why Thompson drove from his home in the Ozarks region of Missouri to the northern Arizona house of his sister-in-law that turned into a bloody and charred crime scene in March 2012.

Thompson used a hatchet and knife to kill his sister-in-law, Penelope Edwards, and her boyfriend, Troy Dunn, according to court testimony. He then poured acid over the bodies and set the house on fire before fleeing the scene.

And then claimed religion compelled him against his will to do so? That’s not just dishonest, that’s a bad guy attacking religion while walking the road to Hell.

Thompson, according to court testimony, aimed to rescue a child in the couple’s custody who was being subjected to behavioral-health treatments, including the use of anti-depressants. As a person raised as a Scientologist, Thompson believed that psychiatric treatment was damaging to the child’s eternal soul.

“(Scientologists) think psychology is evil and a scam,” defense attorney Robert Gundacker told jurors in his opening statement. He also invoked the name of Tom Cruise, the movie actor and Scientologist who famously railed against psychology during an interview on NBC’s “Today” show in 2005.

Many people think psychology is evil and a scam. In fact, after the APA got woke it’s possibly the majority opinion of men. But Scientologists do the Sigmund Freud thing, too, so this is all hypocrisy. I’d rather take my chances with pills than quacks.

For the background information that leads me to suspect Thompson’s wife was Thompson’s real motivation, we go now to the Daily Beast.

Did Scientology Drive Kenneth Wayne Thompson to Commit Bloody Murder?

By Tarpley Hitt, 19 February 2019

You can tell from the date that the guilty verdict hadn’t yet been announced, hence my giving the other article first.

n March of 2012, according to court testimony, a 28-year-old man named Kenneth Wayne Thompson told his wife and two kids he was taking a quick trip away from their home in Doniphan, Missouri to Memphis, Tennessee. Thompson’s mother and stepfather had died in a motorcycle accident eight months prior, leaving him with a small sum of money. The trip, he allegedly told his wife, had something to do with their estate. But after Thompson left his family, he didn’t go to Memphis. Instead, he drove 1,400 miles west to the small mountain town of Prescott Valley, Arizona, where he bludgeoned Penelope Edwards and Troy Dunn.his wife’s sister and her fianc?.to death with a hatchet, poured acid over their bodies, and set the house on fire.

I think the recent death of his parents played a role, just not the role of an alibi.

This month, in the opening arguments for a major, lengthy trial which could send Thompson to death row, defense attorneys laid out a daytime-soap subplot of an argument for Thompson’s detour: the Church of Scientology. Alongside the legalese of standard court documents, Thompson’s defense includes the Scientology “tone scale,. a diagram which purports to sketch the full spectrum of human emotion, multiple mentions of the phrase “eternal soul,. and the name Tom Cruise.

The lawyers. thesis hinged on the fact that the female victim’s son was receiving psychiatric treatment. Scientology, a religion the practice of which involves regular one-on-one meetings with a counselor to talk through emotional and mental problems (a ritual they call .auditing.), has a long, bitter opposition to psychiatry.a church spokesperson told The Daily Beast that the industry is “brutal” and rife with “human rights violations.” Thompson’s lawyers claim their client is a practicing member of the faith (the church denies any affiliation), whose opposition to mental health treatment led him to intervene on his nephew-in-law.s behalf.

Notice the “nephew-in-law”. Most familial homicides these days are bio-dad versus bio-mon & stepdad/boyfriend/Sugar Daddy/pimp/ISIS reject.

Of course, the Scientologists refuted the notion that anything about their beliefs leads to homicidal urges. That would be more convincing except that the wife of current Scientology leader, David Miscavige, Shelly Miscavige, hasn’t been seen in public since 2007.

The victims, 35-year-old Penelope Edwards (n?e Rhoads) and her fianc?, 38-year-old Troy Dunn, had been trying to start over. For more than a decade, Edwards had struggled with drug addiction, abusive partners, and managing both while parenting two young kids, Devynn and Ben (The Daily Beast has changed his name because he is a minor). In 2003, when her 5-year-old daughter confessed she had been molested by her stepfather, Edwards did not take any action. .She just hit him and cried,. Devynn said. Later, relatives reported the incident to the local sheriff, ultimately sending the stepfather to prison, and landing Edwards with a charge for failure to report.

Holy shit! They prosecuted a wimmin for hybristophilia! The local cops probably had a pool on what fate this particular family was going to meet. I can find only one blurry picture of her, from the linked article.

If her nose has no ridge and is just a smooth S shape, that indicates very weak willpower.

[Devynn Rhoads, the daughter of the woman Thompson allegedly murdered] told The Daily Beast that neither sibling had known their legal uncle particularly well. Both Rhoads and her brother had lived with their aunt for four years, but in that time, .Kenny was only in the picture for the last two months,. she said.

Thompson didn’t have a personal relationship with the kids. No financial motive, either, not that the prosecution found. Therefore, he committed the murder on behalf of someone else… and as mentioned earlier, his parents had died eight months previous. He didn’t do it for them.

That leaves his wife. Does she have a motive for wanting her sister dead? Or a motive for wanting to claim her sister’s kids? Besides the stepfather being arrested for child abuse?

Around that time, Edwards also lost custody of her kids. In 2004, after a period in state foster care, Devynn and Ben went to live with their mother’s sister, Gloria Rhoads, first in Arizona, and then in Alaska, where Gloria would meet her future husband, Kenneth Wayne Thompson.

The kids. time with their aunt, now known as Gloria Thompson, was fraught, Devynn recalled, in part because both siblings were traumatized by their unstable early years. Ben, who would later get diagnosed with reactive attachment disorder, a condition which develops when children have no secure parental bond, was prone to angry, violent episodes. (.For a while, people were concerned about whether [he] was going to be the next Ted Bundy,. Devynn said). But the 20-year-old also said problems stemmed from Gloria and Edwards, who had a “terrible relationship” and whose childhood rivalry had grown into “pure sibling hatred.. (.Gloria was the only sibling that my mom never talked to or about, really,. Devynn said. “And every time Gloria talked about my mom it was mean, hateful, angry..) Gloria did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Yep, double motive. She hated her sister and had a barren womb. No mention anywhere of her own kids.

Just before Edwards regained custody of her kids, Gloria met a man on an online dating site. Thompson, a boxy white man with reddish hair and a soul patch, took the kids. aunt out several times before they met him. .She told us about him a lot, how she wanted us to meet him,. Devynn said. .One time, it was a full weekend that he came over to meet us, and he spent most of the time in the bedroom with Gloria with the door closed. We weren’t really getting to know him..

Captain Save-A-Ho at least got lots of sex… so much sex that the traumatized children living with their unmarried aunt while bio-mom and stepdad were in jail felt neglected because of it.

Father God, thank you that my own online-dating efforts came to nothing.

Not long after, Edwards regained custody of the kids, and they returned to Prescott Valley, Arizona. The young mother had gotten clean, rented an apartment, and started seeing a man she.d met online, Troy Dunn. Life wasn’t exactly easy; there was still some shuffling around.Devynn said she spent her seventh grade year living with family in a nearby town. But when she returned, Edwards had moved into a house with Dunn. .For the first time in our whole entire lives,. Devynn said, .we had our own rooms, had our own bed that we got to pick out. We got to pick out all of our own furniture. We had dinner like a family pretty much every night that we were all, Troy, Mom and [Ben]..

Edwards started taking parenting classes at a local clinic. She starting going to therapy with each of her kids, and sought treatment for Ben, who still suffered from behavioral problems. .She got better at learning how to.I won’t say subdue him because that sounds dramatic,. Devynn said, “but how to just slow him down safely so that he wouldn’t hurt himself or anyone else.” Ben’s treatment involved medication, periodic stays at a local respite home, and occasional trips to the mental health clinic at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, which is where he was on March 16, 2012, when Thompson is alleged to have arrived and beaten his mother and her boyfriend to death. When police examined the body, Edwards had 22 bodily wounds, some showing “signs of chopping,. according to the Arizona Republic, and a severed jugular vein.

Two ghetto rats hated each other, then one of them started pulling her life together. Hell hath no fury like watching an inmate escape. Strange, however, that a man who arrived on the scene only recently would be so passionate in the crime. A double-tap with a low caliber pistol would have gotten the victims just as dead as two dozen chops with a hatchet.

Thompson cleaned up the crime scene by dumping acid on the bodies and burning the house down. I can believe he came up with the latter–it’s a stupid but plausible way to destroy evidence, therefore appealing to the stupid–but I can’t believe he came up with the former.

Long, thick eyebrows and orderly hair indicate he’s not low-IQ. He should know that if you kill someone in their own home then there’s no point in mutilating the body. The police will just assume the victim is the homeowner and be proven right within the week when the homeowner’s employer and family file missing persons reports.

So, who gave him the idea to pour acid on the bodies of (to him) total strangers? Occam’s Razor: his BPD girlfriend, stringing him along with lots of crazy sex, because she saw it in a movie.

And for the smoking dick gun, here’s the story of how Thompson’s arrest went down.

…An Arizona Department of Public Safety Officer named Matt Bratz noticed a white Ford Taurus with Missouri plates on the I-40 near Flagstaff, Arizona. As Bratz saw it, the driver was acting visibly weird. He was, as the trooper later wrote in his report, .staring straight ahead with both arms locked out and gripping the steering wheel.” In court testimony, the trooper explained that he began following the vehicle from a distance, and eventually pulled them over. The man behind the wheel was Thompson.

That is one awesomely eagle-eyed state trooper.

From the window of the Taurus, the trooper saw a red gas can and smelled solvent. His K-9 unit caught wind of a substance and began barking, although the trooper would not find any evidence of drugs. As Bratz spoke to Thompson, he would later tell jurors, the defendant’s behavior grew increasingly anxious. His hands shook and his chest heaved, according to Arizona Republic accounts of court testimony. Apropos of nothing, Thompson launched into an anecdote about visiting a wildlife park and observing an employee feed the wild animals raw meat. Some blood from the meat had splashed onto his pants, Thompson reportedly said, forcing him to change clothes.

The wicked flee though none pursue. A cop’s favorite Bible verse.

When Bratz searched Thompson’s car, he turned up the bloody pants, a bloodier hatchet, a sample of human hair, and a handgun. Bratz handcuffed him. As they waited by the side of the road, Thompson asked the trooper if prisoners in Arizona could get conjugal visits.

Why was he thinking of continued sexual access to his wife when arrested on the way home from the double murder of his wife’s hated sister? Because that had been his motive for doing it. He was so thirsty for sex that he did a gruesome double murder in return for continued access to a feral skank’s used crotch.

With his parents dead and no kids of his own, he didn’t have much to live for anyway. Grief and depression may have played a role in his emotional state. Meanwhile, nobody is looking at prosecuting wifey. She manipulated Thompson into doing this for her, now she can cut him loose forever and monkey-branch to a new chump. I bet Scientology has a great Sunday Morning Nightclub. The men are prescreened for vulnerability to mind games.


Newsom Didn’t Cancel High Speed Rail Because the Feds Hadn’t Stopped Paying For It

I recently gave Newsom some hate in his State of the State speech for giving up on high-speed rail except for a useless corridor through the poorer regions of California’s Central Valley. Turns out that the reason for it is there’s different definitions of “the money is spent”.

Trump to Use “Nuclear Option” to Recover $2.5 Bn More from California’s Failed High-Speed Rail Project

By Joel B. Pollack, 22 February 2019

The Trump administration announced this week that it was canceling nearly $1 billion in grant money for California’s now-defunct high-speed rail project . and President Donald Trump is coming for the other $2.5 billion.

The $2.5 billion has already been spent . but California has failed to deliver the high-speed rail (on time, or at all) as promised.

Therefore, the Trump administration argues, the state has to repay federal taxpayers.

Yeah, sure, but everybody’s been talking like the $3.5b was already spent? Quoting Newsom in his State of the State speech, “And by the way, I am not interested in sending $3.5 billion in federal funding that was allocated to this project back to Donald Trump.” So, his wording turned to to be deceptive. Why is nobody surprised?

The Los Angeles Times quoted Stanford law professor David Freeman Engstrom, a Stanford law professor, describing Trump’s effort as a “nuclear option..

The practice of recovering money after a breach of contract, while common in the private sector, was virtually unheard of in government, he explained.

One supposes that, for government, balancing the budget and protecting the innocent from the guilty would be “nuclear options”. Engstrom has a typical male feminist face, not to mention tenure at a celebrity university, so it’s understandable why he would consider competent leadership and fiscal responsibility to be threatening concepts:

Whistle-blowing Kasowitz Firm Seeks Billions From Chemical Giants (Corrected) - Media Coverage ...

On Tuesday, the Federal Railroad Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation wrote to California’s High-Speed Rail Authority, informing it that it had breached the terms of its contract with the federal government and that $928,620,000 would therefore no longer be available to the project.

Newsom objected, again: .This is California’s money.” He also claimed Trump was taking revenge for California’s leading role in filing a federal lawsuit against Trump’s national emergency declaration to build the “wall.”

I’m more inclined to think of it as funding the wall rather than retaliation for prohibiting a wall. If Trump had actually cared to retaliate for the anti-Wall omnibus bill Congress forced upon him then he would have arrested sitting legislators for treason. Not to change the subject, but I’m eligible for jury duty again. Hint hint, Mister President.

Anyway, Trump could flush that spent-but-not-yet-spent billion dollars down the toilet and it’d be a better use of it than anything Sacramento would have done.

I wonder how long until the pretense of a mini-high speed rail is dropped.


Unpersoning Takes Two Days: Goodloe Sutton

At first I thought this a publicity stunt, then just a sad tale of dementia. But the real story is in the reaction. Goodloe Sutton, a has-been journalist with a tiny readership in the South, called for the KKK to ride on D.C. Two working days later, he was unpersoned by his peers.

Goodloe Sutton: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

By Ellyn Santiago, 19 February 2019

Goodloe Sutton, the 79-year-old editor and publisher of a small Alabama newspaper founded by his father a century ago suggests that the Ku Klux Klan should robe up and ride into Washington D.C. under the cover of darkness and lynch Democratic lawmakers, elected officials he claims are actually “socialist communists..

Sutton.s paper is the Democrat-Reporter, a small weekly with a circulation of around 2,000. It wasn’t always struggling and once had a much wider readership, but not unlike many newspapers in small local markets, it’s struggled to survive, it was reported. It’s a relic. And now some are saying good riddance.

This is what he wrote (this report has not been edited):

Time for the Ku Klux Klan tonight ride again. Democrats in the Republican Party and Democrats are plotting to raise taxes in Alabama. They do not understand how to eliminate expenses when money is needed in other areas. This socialist communist ideology sounds good to the ignorant, the uneducated, and the simpleminded people.

People who do not understand the constitution do not like to be responsible. Slaves, just freed after the Civil War, were not stupid. At times, they borrowed their former masters. robes and horses and rode through the night to frighten some evil doer. Sometimes they had to kill one or two of them, but so what.

This is the same so what used when Democrats got us into World War I and World War II. Then they got us fighting in Korea. Next when the industrial northeast wanted more money, they got us in the Vietnam war, and now in the Middle East war.

If you haven’t noticed, they did away with the draft so their sons would not have to go into battle. Seems like the Klan would be a welcome to raid the gated communities up there they called him compounds now. Truly, they are the ruling class.

On first blush, it’s something a newsman might publish to get enough sensation to keep his 2,000-circulation paper in business. But if this is the original grammar then the guy’s obviously not doing well between the ears. His wife died in 2003, too. The kind thing to do in this situation is ignore the boor, let him rant and die quietly. Probably not even a long wait at this point.

Small-town publisher hopes to hold on until century mark

But the Left is displeased!

Editors at nearby small papers, including a collegiate one, saw the editorial.

The Democrat-Reporter in Linden, Alabama doesn’t have a website; it’s strictly ink-on-paper for the couple thousand readers. When the Montgomery Advertiser called Sutton to confirm if he, in fact, wrote the editorial that ran in his paper last week, he said yes, it was him.

Sutton told the paper, .If we could get the Klan to go up there and clean out D.C., we’d all been better off..

.Asked to elaborate what he meant by “cleaning up D.C.,. Sutton suggested lynching.

.We.ll get the hemp ropes out, loop them over a tall limb and hang all of them,. Sutton said.

When asked if he felt it was appropriate for the publisher of a newspaper to call for the lynching of Americans, Sutton doubled down on his position.

.. It’s not calling for the lynchings of Americans. These are socialist-communists we’re talking about. Do you know what socialism and communism is?. Sutton said..

Well, Sutton isn’t wrong about them not being Americans. *Gunner Q points at Ilhan Omar and Mazie Hirono.* But his ranting doesn’t add up because the KKK were Democrats organizing against Republican carpetbaggers. This is like asking Antifa to bike-lock Hillary Clinton. Awkward!

Heck, there was a time people were relaxed enough about politics to enjoy cranks like Sutton. Who amongst my readers is not entertained by Sutton’s October 2017 editorial about the NFL’s kneeling scandal? Here it comes:

Let Football Boys Kneel

“Some 20 years ago, watching professional football became as much fun as watching professional wrestling live on Channel 5. That was the Mobile [Alabama] channel we could get on our black and white fuzzy gray television set in the 1950s. The wrestlers put on a good show. Football players put on a good show, too.

“Some of the news programs are making a big to-do about black football players kneeling in the stadiums. That’s what black folks were taught to do two hundred years ago, kneel before a white man.

“Is that it? Let them kneel!”

Feel the burn, Colin Kaepernick! Or this editorial from March 2017:

Thank You, Russia

“Northeastern Democrats are now claiming the Russians fiddled around on the internet to keep Hillary Clinton from becoming president of the United States. True or not, we don’t blame the Russians if they did. America could not survive the incoherent babbling the little Miss Piggy. Also, if America didn’t survive, neither would Russia.

“Thank you Russia for helping us, if indeed you did. More than half the women who voted voted for Donald Trump. It boils down to Hillary just wanting to satisfy her ego. Nothing else, just to be the first.

“Again, thank you Russia, or God, or whoever cut out the little fat oinker.”

Mister Sutton, the Onion is on Line 2. They want to offer you a monthly column. And 4chan is still holding on Line 1.

Alas, Sutton’s peers were less amused.

Sutton and his wife Jean, also a journalist and who passed away in 2003, were graduates of The University of Southern Mississippi. The school of journalism inducted them into their Hall of Fame in 2007.

.Southern Miss graduates, Goodloe and Jean Sutton, lived their lives and shared their journalism careers together, beginning when they both worked on the staff of The Student Printz, Goodloe as an executive editor and Jean as a business manager,. the University wrote. .In 1964, they went to work for The Democrat-Reporter in Linden, Alabama . Goodloe as editor and publisher and Jean as a reporter.. … Southern Miss said the couple was “well respected civic leaders in Linden and in Western Alabama..

That was 2007. This is 2019:

Tuesday afternoon, the University removed Sutton from the Journalism Hall of Fame per the Clarion-Ledger: .The University of Southern Mississippi’s journalism department has removed an Alabama newspaper editor from its Hall of Fame after news broke he wrote an editorial calling for the return of the Ku Klux Klan and lynching…

That’s two working days from publishing the KKK editorial to being unpersoned thanks to President’s Day. And the Heavy’s article ends with this:

This story has been updated to reflect Sutton’s removal from the University of Southern Mississippi journalism Hall of Fame and to reflect that he is not a trustee nor a member of the Vestavia Chamber of Commerce. His name, and other information about Sutton were listed on the website, but the page was removed after this story was published.

It gets more tragic as we proceed to Wikipedia. Sutton was once a real-deal investigative journalist in line for a Pulitzer.

In 1998, Sutton received widespread acclaim for articles exposing corruption in the Marengo County Sheriff’s Office; he always credited his wife, Jean, “with laboring over courthouse records”. These articles, many written by his wife, led to guilty pleas by Sheriff Roger Davis for extortion, soliciting a bribe, and failure to pay state income taxes on the extorted money, for which he received two concurrent 27-month sentences.

For the series of articles with accompanying documentation Sutton was threatened; the Sheriff, according to Sutton, “started telling anyone who would listen that my oldest son was involved in drugs, my wife was having affairs and I was drunk all the time.” He received death threats and lost circulation and $50,000 per year in advertising in his newspaper; a local church official told him to “lay off the sheriff”. A deputy, Wilmer “Sonny” Breckenridge, threatened to plant drugs in Sutton’s home, according to Sutton. He and his wife were randomly pulled over and harassed, as was their oldest son.

His articles led to a federal undercover investigation, which in turn led to the arrest of 68 people in a drug raid. Breckenridge, who was Marengo County’s chief drug enforcement officer, was convicted of conspiracy to sell drugs and was sentenced to life in prison without parole.

That’s a very respectable achievement and Sutton was duly honored:

As a result of his reporting and editorials Sutton was awarded the Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment Award and the Society of Professional Journalists’ Sunshine Award. He was inducted in 2007 into the University of Southern Mississippi’s School of Mass Communication and Journalism Hall of Fame. In 2009, he received the Distinguished Community Journalist Award from Auburn University. Alabama representative Earl F. Hilliard, an African African, read on the floor of Congress a declaration praising him, saying: “His story is a shining example of the best and the brightest which occurs in America when a single citizen has the bravery to stand alone, in the face of mounting pressure and odds, and stands up for justice and equality.” He and his wife were also the subject of a People magazine article.

Two admiring readers submitted his work for the Pulitzer Prize for journalism, and he had supporting letters from other journalists. When the awards were to be announced a Fox News crew, a TV reporter, and a variety of other reportees were waiting with him, but he did not win.

On the same day Southern Miss removed him from its Hall of Fame, the Auburn’s Journalism Advisory Council rescinded its award for his legitimately courageous journalism. Also, “the Alabama Press Association censured Sutton, saying he “brought disgrace upon newspapers in Alabama and the profession,” and suspended the Democrat-Reporter”. Why? Because while forgotten in his dotage, he swung Left.

That’s the sickness of Social Justice. It doesn’t matter who you were yesterday; if you’re outside the Narrative today then you must be destroyed. Loyalty means nothing to the very people who constantly demand it.

Alabama political columnist Kyle Whitmire, who had worked at the Democrat-Reporter as a young man, published a column in which he speculated that Sutton, now 80, had gone into sharp decline since the death of his wife and might be suffering from dementia or alcoholism.

More than likely, for a celebrated journalist to have grammar as bad as Sutton’s. Shame on the little fat oinkers for sending Boxer to the glue factory!


Judge Claims Nothing Wrong with HIV in Military Personnel

We all knew it would come to this… “We” being the Red Pill-aware plus all registered Democrats.

Federal judge temporarily blocks military from forcing out HIV-positive airmen

A federal judge on Friday blocked the military from forcing out a pair of HIV-positive airmen, saying she had seen no evidence that the disease should prevent them from serving.

.These are the kinds of people that it seems to me the military wants to keep in the service,. Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia said in court while issuing an injunction. She elaborated in a memorandum, chastising the government for providing “no evidence, whether anecdotal or otherwise, of the effect of HIV on a servicemember’s medical fitness or the military’s readiness..

Her ruling allows the two airmen who sued to remain in their posts pending trial. Both would otherwise have been terminated in the next few weeks.

An incurable, contagious disease is all the evidence a sane person needs to know that HIV-infected people are unfit for work in a career field that specializes in bloodshed. The plaintiffs are Air Force so there’s the usual debate over whether they should be categorized as military personnel or civilian contractors but that’s not relevant to Judge Brinkema’s ruling.

.We’re absolutely thrilled,. said Scott Schoettes, an attorney for the airmen from the LGBT civil rights group Lambda Legal. .We look forward to trial in this matter, where we can show HIV status has no bearing on an airman’s ability to serve..

Schoettes. There’s no picture of Judge Brinkema but courtroom sketches indicate nothing that would surprise my readers.

Both active-duty airmen began antiretroviral treatment after testing HIV positive in 2017, and doctors deemed them asymptomatic and physically fit to deploy. Their commanders agreed. But in November, they were told they would be discharged because personnel with HIV are barred from deploying to the Middle East.

Former defense secretary Jim Mattis pushed to cut from the military anyone who was not deployable worldwide. Schoettes argued in court that the policy was arbitrary because several other HIV-positive airmen have been retained. The airmen also maintain that they can serve in the Middle East and manage the virus with a pill a day and blood tests every few months, which could be sent to a lab. They pointed out that the military does not categorically bar from combat zones people who take daily medication for asthma, hypertension or dyslipidemia.

So much to unpack here. First off, deployability is a critical issue for a military with an active, global presence. Second, the retaining of HIV-infected airmen in any capacity would only be a consequence of pro-Sodomite policies. It’s like saying female Army Rangers are as good as male ones because there are women wearing authorized Ranger tabs.

It goes without saying that “he’s perfectly healthy so long as he gets his daily medication, has blood tests flown back to CONUS for monitoring, isn’t exposed to anything his weakened immune system might not be able to handle and refrains from sexual behavior like he hasn’t been” does not mean “he’s perfectly healthy”. I know the thought is inconceivable to a modern American princess but there are dangers of servicemen becoming stranded overseas for reasons from “prisoner of war” to “domestic economic collapse”.

Neither asthma, hypertension nor dyslipidemia are infectious diseases. The latter is a related condition to cholesterol, if I read the description right.

And lastly, who is Judge Brinkema to tell the military how it should run a deployment? I checked and she’s never served a day in uniform… probably not even a cheerleader’s uniform. Her experience with military issues is limited to declaring the civilian courts are good enough.


Fed. judge says courts can handle Gitmo cases

By Matthew Barakat, 2 April 2009

A federal judge who presided over the trial of a 9/11 conspirator said Thursday that civilian courts are capable of handling the cases of Guantanamo Bay detainees.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema told a gathering at the University of Virginia law school that the courts’ ability to handle even the most complicated terrorism cases was demonstrated by the prosecution of terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui in her courtroom.

She also said the government should not abuse classification procedures to suppress information about mistreatment of detainees. She said it’s been her experience that much of what the government seeks to keep classified has more to do with avoiding embarrassment than divulging secrets.

“As embarrassing and as ugly as some of this information might be, it is not in my view national security information,” she said.

End segue.

Brinkema said in court that she was inclined to agree based on the medical evidence. .We’re not talking about a complicated problem,. she said. .It’s probably less complicated than sleep apnea..

How many hundreds of billions of dollars have been flung at cutting-edge retroviral research for GRIDS to not be a early death sentence? Soldiers used to cure sleep apnea by sewing cannonballs into the backs of pajama tops. Curing GRIDS has proven to be rather more complicated.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Norway said in court that the military had to consider a .worst-case scenario. . if the medication was lost, a person’s viral load could rise to detectable levels. Because the two men are younger, he said, they are more likely to be sent to the Middle East than those who were not terminated.

Washington Litigation Lawyer Robert Norway

Best pic of Norway I could find.

Brinkema said studies found that would take weeks; Norway countered that it could take “as little as nine days..

A smarter lawyer would have argued that because the plaintiffs were obviously active homosexuals, they would be at severe risk of being put to death by Arabs who prefer goats. For their safety and the prevention of cultural appropriation, they cannot be deployed!

However, Brinkema questioned why the government had provided no recent medical research to defend its position while the plaintiffs had. In her ruling, she noted that a military-published study from 2015 concluded HIV .has gone from an untreatable disease. to one “that is compatible with active service throughout a full career in the U.S. military..

Whoever wrote that study either lied or qualified it to being just as dishonest. One reason “scientists” have begun falsifying their research is so it can be used to justify inhuman decisions like Brinkema’s. “They won’t become contagious fast enough to make a difference” has got to be in the Top 10 Stupidest Reasons To Approve Military Service.

In court filings, the government also expressed concern about “transmission of HIV on the battlefield,. including from a “battlefield blood transfusion.” Brinkema dismissed such fears, writing that .HIV is not as easily transmitted as many people believe. and cannot be transmitted at all when a person’s viral load is suppressed by medication.

Would Her Honor care to prove this by accepting a small blood transfusion from a plaintiff?

.Defendants have not identified a single recorded case of accidental transmission of HIV on the battlefield, which is unsurprising given the uncontroverted evidence that even without effective treatment, the risk of transmission through nonintimate contact such as blood splash is negligible,. she wrote.

Unless the blood splashes in the eyes, nose, mouth or a skin cut/abrasion, as frequently happens on a battlefield. She’s not even trying to make a case, she’s just trying to handwave the objections away while issuing her dictat.

A servicemember who knows himself to be HIV positive, she acknowledged, could not give blood, but “many servicemembers cannot give blood for various reasons” and are still deployed.

Are any of those “various reasons” incurable, fatal diseases?

The two airmen filed suit using the aliases Richard Roe and Victor Voe to avoid the stigma of publicizing their HIV status. Voe, who Brinkema noted has deployed to the Middle East twice, came to court Friday in uniform.

.I.m really excited,. he said after the hearing. .This is the first time in two years I’ve had hope..

Hope of getting your Combat Infantry Badge? Then why did you join the Air Force? Hope of being banished from the First World to a Godforsaken wasteland again? Probably not. We already know he isn’t close to retirement. What, then, is he hoping for? Scroll back to the top, to the third italicized paragraph:

Her ruling allows the two airmen who sued to remain in their posts pending trial.


Gavin Newsom’s SOS

I fisked New California Governor Gavin Newsom’s recent State of the State speech. It’s full of toxic Leftism as one would expect but there are points of interest. Allies, enemies and best of all, Newsom repeatedly confessing his incompetence to govern. Boldface are mine for reference.

12 February 2019

Mr. Speaker, thank you for being a champion for all Californians . and for welcoming Jen and me into your house today.

Madam Pro Tem . thank you for your commitment to collaboration, which has helped make our first month together so productive.

I also have the honor of saying for the first time ever in this chamber: thank you Madam Lieutenant Governor for that very kind and short introduction.

To all the constitutional officers and legislators assembled here today . thank you for your service to our state.

And let me reassure everyone: our son Dutch is not here. We learned our lesson at the inauguration.

Segue for context:

Gavin Newsom’s 2-year-old son, Dutch, stole the show at his father’s inaugural address.

Carrying a blanket and pacifier, Dutch wandered on to a stage outside of the California Capitol and wouldn’t leave it as his father delivered remarks to an audience of lawmakers and former governors.

No way that happened accidentally. The Governor used his own son as a political prop to endear himself to the wimmin. Strike that, it was probably Co-Governor Jennifer Newsom’s idea. I like to think that even Gavin has enough manhood to not see his child as a meal ticket. Either way, how unprofessional.

Governor Gavin Newsom is interrupted on stage by his ...

The governor scooped Dutch up in his arms and continued delivering his speech. Dutch rested his head on his father’s shoulder as he spoke about sanctuary cities and immigration policy.

“I promise you, my fellow collaborators against the United States, that my own son here will grow up to be a persecuted minority in his own homeland.”

End segue.

Today, I want to talk about how we can do that together.

By every traditional measure, the state of our state is strong.

We have a record-breaking surplus. added 3 million jobs since the depths of the recession.

Wages are rising.

Who is this “we”, kemosabe?

We have more scientists, researchers, and engineers, more Nobel laureates, and the finest system of higher education anywhere in the world.

All of whom are working in poverty at Walmart.

But along with that prosperity and progress, there are problems that have been deferred for too long and that threaten to put the California dream out of reach for too many.

We face hard decisions that are coming due.

The choices we make will shape our future for decades.

This is what I want to talk about today, as frankly and directly as I can:

The tough calls we must make together on rail, water, and energy. How we protect migrants, care for seniors, and help the homeless, and how we will tackle the affordability crisis that is coming to define life in this state.

I won’t pretend to have all the answers. But the only way to find them is to face these issues honestly.

If you don’t have the answers then you shouldn’t be Governor. GTFO so somebody competent can do the job. Gawddammit, *I* have the answers to all of those problems and I’m a nobody. Christ, Country, Fatherhood and don’t spend more than you earn. Boom, done.

Let.s start with the fear mongering from the White House about the so-called “emergency” at our border.

For me, this is an echo from 15 years ago.

I was a new mayor sitting in the gallery at the State of the Union when President Bush said LGBT Americans should not be able to get married.

It was an attack on our friends and neighbors, and on California’s values.

Interesting that Newsom equates immigration with LGBT perversion acceptance. The true “emergency” from his perspective is opposition to Globalism.

I was so proud to watch brave Californians answer those attacks with love and courage. Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin made history when they were married 15 years ago to this very day.

They were married by Gavin Newsom in violation of California law. His mention of those two women exposes a history of California’s sodomization that I’d never known before. I will post on them! For now, this passage from Wikipedia: “They were married on February 12, 2004, in the first same-sex wedding to take place in San Francisco after Mayor Gavin Newsom ordered the city clerk to begin providing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, but that marriage was voided by the California Supreme Court on August 12, 2004. They married again on June 16, 2008, in the first same-sex wedding to take place in San Francisco after the California Supreme Court’s decision in In re Marriage Cases legalized same-sex marriage in California.

Ah, the love and courage of Californians… overturned by judicial fiat so fugly Lesbians can fornicate in public.


Del Martin in 1972. Eww! Only a woman could want to wife THAT up.

Now, just like back then, we must stand up for those maligned, marginalized, and scapegoated.

Because last week, we heard another president stand up at the State of the Union and offer a vision of an America fundamentally at odds with California values.

He described a country where inequality doesn’t seem to be a problem, where climate change doesn’t exist, and where the greatest threat we face comes from families seeking asylum.

I don’t see any Russians storming our borders, Gavin. And climate change? First it was nuclear winter, then it was global warming, now it’s climate “change” because you Leftoids can’t keep your lies straight.

Just last night, he went down to El Paso and said it again.

Let us state the facts. We are currently experiencing the lowest number of border crossings since 1971.

In California, like our nation, our undocumented population is at its lowest level in more than a decade.

Some 550,000 fewer in our state alone.

“The border situation isn’t an emergency because we have fewer illegal immigrants than ever… but don’t worry, I plan to fix that.”

Immigrants, both those here legally and those without documentation, commit crime at a lower rate than native-born citizens.

And those families, women and children, seeking asylum at our borders, are doing so lawfully.

Even the Mexicans whose land they merely pass through don’t agree with you.

Those are the facts. The border “emergency” is a manufactured crisis and California will not be part of this political theater.

We’re not backing down. Just yesterday, I gave the National Guard a new mission . one that will refocus on the real threats facing our state.

A third of our forces currently on the border will be redeployed to help prepare for the upcoming fire season by joining CAL FIRE in prevention and suppression. Work, ironically, the federal government curtailed during the recent shutdown.

This is an act of treason. Newsom is overriding Federal control of the California National Guard and taking them off the border for the specific purpose of thwarting national border security. It goes without saying that California’s fire problem… exacerbated by California’s infrastructure problem… is a State issue, not a national issue.

Another third will boost the National Guard’s statewide Counterdrug Task Force by redeploying up north to go after illegal cannabis farms, many of which are run by cartels, are devastating our pristine forests, and are increasingly becoming fire hazards themselves.

Marijuana growing is no longer a Drug War concern. It’s a taxation and zoning concern post-legalization. His willingness to use the military on civilians is a problem of a different sort… unless, of course, those cartels are the illegal immigrants committing fewer crimes that he mentioned.

The remaining third of our Guard will focus on stopping criminals smuggling drugs and guns through existing border checkpoints.

Probably a smoke screen to avoid prosecution for treason.

A wall that stretches thousands of miles through the wilderness will do nothing to stop this threat.

For a laugh, neither will the wall around the California Governor’s mansion:

This is our answer to the White House: No more division, no more xenophobia and no more nativism. We suffered enough from that in the nineties with Props 187 and 227.

Next, let’s level about High-Speed Rail. I have nothing but respect for Governor Brown’s and Governor Schwarzenegger’s ambitious vision. I share it. And there’s no doubt that our state’s economy and quality of life depend on improving transportation.

But let’s be real. The project, as currently planned, would cost too much and take too long. There’s been too little oversight and not enough transparency.

Right now, there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to LA. I wish there were.

The former trip is half again longer than the latter. Gavin is probably thinking of his own personal convenience here. I remember a scandal in Los Angeles in which a high speed rail line to Las Vegas was scrapped when the Mayor’s wife turned out to be spending taxpayer money on Vegas gambling trips. Let me see if I can find that story… *Gunner Q misclicks*

Begin segue:

22 September 2015

The trip from LA to Las Vegas may only take an hour by air, but the hassles associated with air travel have seen numerous proposals for a high-speed rail link between the two cities floated over the years. Lack of cash has usually proven the insurmountable hurdle, but after failing to secure a US$5.5 billion federal loan, XpressWest has found another way forward by teaming up with China Railway International USA in a joint venture that could see the link begin construction in late 2016.

Sigh, that’s way too recent to be the scandal I was thinking of but thanks for the reminder of how welcomed China is with its billion-dollar investments in California’s infrastructure. If Newsom had any loyalty to the United States, this sort of collaboration with foreign powers would concern him. I’ve had the same thought about Trump but credit where it’s due, his trade war against the PRC has dried up the funds for such insidious behavior. For the moment of his Presidency. Still nobody doing perp walks.

End segue.

However, we do have the capacity to complete a high-speed rail link between Merced and Bakersfield.

I know that some critics will say this is a “train to nowhere.” But that’s wrong and offensive. The people of the Central Valley endure the worst air pollution in America as well as some of the longest commutes. And they have suffered too many years of neglect from policymakers here in Sacramento. They deserve better.

A recent post of mine handled this but let me say in passing, nobody in Central Valley has a commute worse than the Interstate 405 Parking Lot in Los Angeles. Newsom is lying his head off here and I’m not sure he even has a reason for doing it.

High-Speed Rail is much more than a train project. It’s about economic transformation and unlocking the enormous potential of the Valley.

Much more than a train project, it’s also about corruption, political favor-trading, money laundering, economic centralization and control of the population.

We can align our economic and workforce development strategies, anchored by High-Speed Rail, and pair them with tools like opportunity zones, to form the backbone of a reinvigorated Central Valley economy.

Here’s a money laundering and population control example. “Opportunity Zones” are a concept straight from a Judge Dredd comic. Regions are targeted for “investment” by gov’t-bankster consortiums.

Merced, Fresno, Bakersfield, and communities in between are more dynamic than many realize.

“Vibrant”, he means. With land devalued by the cities being turned into giant barrios, the land can be bought up cheaply to create new, tiny kingdoms for the politically connected. Feudalism returns!

The Valley may be known around the world for agriculture, but there is another story ready to be told. A story of a region hungry for investment, a workforce eager for more training and good jobs, Californians who deserve a fair share of our state’s prosperity.

Look, we will continue our regional projects north and south. We’ll finish Phase 1 environmental work. We’ll connect the revitalized Central Valley to other parts of the state, and continue to push for more federal funding and private dollars. But let’s just get something done.

And there’s the corruption and favor-trading.

For those who want to walk away from this whole endeavor, I offer you this:

Abandoning high-speed rail entirely means we will have wasted billions of dollars with nothing but broken promises and lawsuits to show for it.

Sunken costs fallacy.

And by the way, I am not interested in sending $3.5 billion in federal funding that was allocated to this project back to Donald Trump.

HAHAHAAA! You don’t have a choice. It’s THEIR money given for a project YOU mismanaged and abandoned.

Nor am I interested in repeating the same old mistakes.

Today I am ordering new transparency measures.

We’re going to hold contractors and consultants accountable to explain how taxpayer dollars are spent . including change orders, cost overruns, even travel expenses. It’s going online, for everybody to see.

The hypocrisy between this and not repaying that $3.5 billion to the Feds is astonishing.

Now we come to Newsom’s latest hiring decisions.

You’re also going to see some governance changes, starting with my pick for the next chair of the High-Speed Rail Authority, Lenny Mendonca, my Economic Development Director. Because, at the end of the day, transportation and economic development must go hand in hand.

*checks* Mendonca is a low-profile, billionaire globalist specializing in “real estate investments”. Or depending upon who you ask, a poor farmer’s son who love for America got him into Stanford. His physiognomy is Deep State. Especially that smile:

CNN Contributor Maria Cardona, Civic Leader Lenny Mendonca ...

We also need a fresh approach when it comes to meeting California’s massive water challenges.

We have a big state with diverse water needs. Cities that need clean water to drink, farms that need irrigation to keep feeding the world, fragile ecosystems that must be protected.

The entire planet is so fragile, it will explode if these Leftoid tyrants are ever removed from power. /sarc

Our water supply is becoming less reliable because of climate change.

And infrastructure decay, as funds are diverted to welfare.

And our population is growing because of a strong economy.

And massive, uncontrolled immigration.

That means a lot of demand on an unpredictable supply. There are no easy answers.

Again, he says that. Again, an admission that Gavin doesn’t know how to solve California’s actual problems. Let me assist. California borders the Pacific Ocean, the largest body of water in the world. California is narrow; its distance from said Ocean is shorter than the currently existing aqueduct system. Desalination is a proven, mature technology and nearly all of California’s major cities are close to the ocean… but sadly, it’s the sort of work that illiterate Hondurans, single mothers and totalitarian globalists don’t want to do.

But let me be direct about where I stand:

I do not support the Water Fix as currently configured. Meaning, I do not support the twin tunnels. But we can build on the important work that’s already been done. That’s why I do support a single tunnel.

He’s talking about this:

I’m not familiar with it. It reads like an infrastructure upgrade to the aqueduct system, which is conceptually a dubious idea. A gigantic aqueduct network running through earthquake country is not an optimal choice for a city’s water supply but that’s how a large chunk of Los Angeles & outlying areas gets by.

Los Angeles is doomed. But you knew that already.

Gavin doesn’t have an answer to the water shortage but doesn’t like the answers other people found. You knew that already, too.

The status quo is not an option.

We need to protect our water supply from earthquakes and rising sea levels, preserve delta fisheries, and meet the needs of cities and farms.

We have to get past the old binaries, like farmers versus environmentalists, or North versus South. Our approach can’t be .either/or.. It must be .yes/and..

We must have Unity of vision! My vision!

Conveyance and efficiency. And recycling projects like we’re seeing in Southern California’s Met Water District, expanding floodplains in the Central Valley, groundwater recharge, like farmers are doing in Fresno County. We need a portfolio approach to building water infrastructure and meeting long-term demand.

To help bring this balance, I’m appointing a new chair of the California water board, Joaquin Esquivel.

Prior to his appointment to a State Water Board, Esquivel was a legal assistant to Senator Barbara Boxer. A politician who can’t win an election but has plenty of favors to trade.

Now, let’s talk honestly about clean drinking water.

Just this morning, more than a million Californians woke up without clean water to bathe in or drink. Some schools have shut down drinking fountains due to contamination. Some poorer communities, like those I visited recently in Stanislaus County, are paying more for undrinkable water than Beverly Hills pays for its pristine water.

These are three different problems. In order, 1. Homelessness caused by gov’t subsidies for homelessness, 2. gov’t infrastructure neglect and 3. gov’t corruption. Oh, okay, they are one problem after all. Our current gov’t.

This is a moral disgrace and a medical emergency. There are literally hundreds of water systems across the state contaminated by lead, arsenic, or uranium.

Solving this crisis demands sustained funding. It demands political will.

It demands the gov’t do its freaking job and stop milking infrastructure problems like cash cows.

Next, let’s talk about our energy future . and PG&E.s bankruptcy.

We are all frustrated and angry that it’s come to this. PG&E didn’t do enough to secure dangerous equipment or plan for the future. My administration will work to make sure PG&E upholds its obligations. I have convened a team of the nation’s best bankruptcy lawyers and financial experts from the energy sector.

They will work with my strike team to develop a comprehensive strategy that we will present within 60 days. We will ensure continued access to safe affordable power. We will seek justice [GQ: money] for fire victims, fairness [GQ: money] for employees, and protection [GQ: money] for ratepayers. We will continue to invest in safety, and we will never waver on achieving the nation’s most ambitious clean energy goals.

The problems we face are far greater than PG&E. Climate change is putting pressure on all of our utilities.public and private, north and south. Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric both recently had their credit ratings downgraded.

From what I’ve heard by word-of-mouth, PG&E installed automatic reboot systems into its transmission lines. Most interruptions are caused by animals grounding the line which is a brief, one-time interruption as the critter is fried into charcoal and falls. Automating the reboot procedure makes it happen quickly enough to prevent interruption of service, compared to the older system of manually reconnecting a circuit breaker.

Unfortunately, tree branches brushing against power lines is a recurrent grounding, not a one-time event. Bzzt-reboot-bzzt-reboot happening quickly enough (say, in high winds) gives the same sparking effect as a flint firestarter.

The municipal equivalent of replacing a household fuse with a wire because the fuses keep blowing.

I don’t know what kind of R&D was done on the reboot equipment but it sounds like a technical problem, not a credit rating problem.

This pressure comes at a time when the entire energy market is evolving. From roof-top solar and wind generation to smart grid technologies. From Community Choice Aggregators to direct access service. More and more of our electricity now is procured outside of investor-owned utilities.

And procured by gov’t-mandated and -subsidized, expensive, eco-unfriendly, inefficiently low-scale utilities instead. Progress!

Regulations and insurance practices created decades ago didn’t anticipate these changes. We must map out longer-term strategies, not just for the utilities. future, but for California’s energy future, to ensure that the cost of climate change doesn’t fall on those least able to afford it.

They would be the parasites who produce nothing of value. They have trouble affording all kinds of stuff.

Now let me turn to education.

The teachers. strike in LA is over . but the need to confront its underlying causes has only just begun. Understaffed schools, overcrowded classrooms, pension pressures, the achievement gap, and charter school growth . these stressors are showing up all over the state, right here in Sacramento, in Fresno, and Oakland.

Heh, charter school growth is a problem! Because the gov’t can’t directly control charter schools.

Districts across the state are challenged to balance budgets even in this strong economy, and at a time when we’re spending more on schools than ever before.

Seven years ago, we invested $47.3 billion in our schools. Next year, with your support, we’ll invest more than $80 billion . that includes $576 million for special education.

But it’s not enough. We’re still 41st in the nation in per pupil funding. Something needs to change. We need to have an honest conversation about how we fund our schools at a state and local level.

Shouldn’t we be measuring pupil achievement, not money spent? “Our schools are failing because we spend only half as much money as neighboring states for the same result!” raises interesting questions of priorities.

But at the same time, let’s remember that the measure of a school system’s excellence is more than the sum of its budgets.

We need clear and achievable standards of transparency, more information sharing, and accountability for all public schools . traditional and charter.

Transparency. He keeps talking about that. Newsom’s greatest recurring theme in this speech is concern that somebody, somewhere, might be secretly doing something he doesn’t approve of. The devil constantly tests his people for rebellious beliefs because he assumes they’re just like him: a shameless rebel.

We need a new President for the State Board of Education, to lead the way and work alongside State Superintendent Tony Thurmond, and to lift up all of our students. And my pick for that position is nationally recognized education expert Linda Darling-Hammond.

The Linda Darling-Hammond Guide to Educational Leadership ...

Phyiognomy: bitter feminist archetype. Confirming the hyphenated last name.

There’s another urgent moral issue we must confront: the homelessness epidemic.

So many of California’s homeless . whether they’re families, veterans, victims of rent spikes, or survivors fleeing domestic violence . are invisible and left behind by our society. Too many on the streets are suffering from bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or paranoia. Many are self-medicating with drug or alcohol as a consequence. Our homelessness crisis has increasingly become a public health crisis.

Last year, there was a Hepatitis-A outbreak in San Diego. Recently, there was an outbreak of Syphilis in Sonoma. And now, typhus in Los Angeles. Typhus. That’s a Medieval disease. In California. In 2019.

We didn’t have these diseases when CONSERVATIVE, GOD-FEARING HOMOPHOBES ran the government! Maybe we should go back to what worked. Speaking of disease and homophobia, it’s interesting that Newsom didn’t mention the STD rates of San Fransicko. He worked hard to achieve that, yo!

Mayors, county supervisors, and city councils around the state are working hard to reduce homelessness and its underlying causes. We’ve got to have their backs.

Their feces-tracking apps have thus far failed to reduce homelessness. I don’t think feeding & housing the homeless will get rid of them, either.

But they can’t do it alone. To help lead this discussion, I’m appointing a new Commission on Homelessness & Supportive Housing, led by Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg.

Darrell Steinberg - Wikipedia

Good pedoface. I admit, we haven’t yet tried molesting the homeless until they leave. Quick Wikipedia quote: “In 1997, the City of Sacramento engaged in a lawsuit against Loaves and Fishes, a private charity providing food to the homeless. The free lunches began to draw thousands of homeless people which had become a nuisance to local business near the shelter in North Sacramento. Former Mayor Joe Serna and then Councilmember Steinberg were the only two members to vote against the lawsuit.

With your support, let’s put half a billion dollars into immediate funding for navigation centers . emergency shelters with services on site, and another hundred million for Whole Person Care to replace a fragmented approach to services with one that’s more integrated and comprehensive.

How much would it cost to authorize police to hit them with sticks until they go away? Asking for a friend.

And while cities and counties are on the front lines, this challenge will only be solved regionally. We need to work together as a state to focus on prevention, rapid rehousing, mental health, and more permanent supportive housing . because while shelter solves sleep, only permanent supportive housing solves homelessness.

The other 49 states in the Union will thank you as they bus all their homeless to your doorstep… at my expense.

Now, let’s talk about something too often overlooked:

The Golden State is getting grayer. We need to get ready for the major demographic challenge headed our way.

Yes, let’s talk about funding because pensioners and Squatemalans don’t pay the bills.

For the first time in our history, older Californians will outnumber young children. Over the next decade, our statewide senior population will increase by 4 million. In 25 years, it will double. And more than half will require some form of long-term care.

This is a direct result of killing marriage and banning fatherhood.

Growing old knows no boundaries . aging doesn’t care what race you are, your economic status, or if you’re single with no other family support. had some personal . and painful . experience with this recently. I lost my father over the holidays, after years of declining physical health and dementia. He was determined to live out his days with dignity. He also happened to be a retired public official with a pension and a support circle of family and friends.

Everybody won when he died. His own pain ended, the taxpayer had one less mouth to feed and you got a talking point for your speech. First you used your toddler as a political prop, now your dead dad. Thank God I’m not related to you.

Even with all those advantages, it was a daily challenge to meet his needs so he could live in place and maintain a good quality of life. Millions of Californians share a similar story, and the numbers will only grow.

It.s time for a new Master Plan on Aging. It must address: person-centered care, the patchwork of public services, social isolation, bed-locked seniors in need of transportation, the nursing shortage, and demand for In-Home Supportive Services that far outpaces its capacity.

This is not a government problem, how people handle their own old age. I had hoped Gavin would be talking about how to fund his $$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ moonbeams with an aging population, not how he could throw even more $$$ at retired Baby Boomers.

Forget women, let’s take voting rights away from the AARP.

And we can’t talk about aging without focusing on Alzheimer.s.

Too many of us have seen the crushing grip this disease has on our loved ones . and especially on our wives and mothers . two-thirds of new Alzheimer’s cases are women.

[Gavin glances nervously at his wife and self-appointed Co-Governor, Jennifer the failed actress who was talent-scouted by Harvey Weinstein.]

Today, I am launching the Alzheimer’s Prevention and Preparedness Task Force, bringing the most renowned scientists and thinkers together to develop first-of-its-kind research in this area. It will be headed by a leading advocate for families dealing with Alzheimer.s, our former first lady, Maria Shriver. She is here today and we are grateful for her continued service.

Poor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Like Trump, his Governorship started off promising. Arnie even publicly accused Sacramento of being “girlie men” during budget season and it was awesome. (“Girlie men” used to be an insult.) But he backed down afterwards and became a forgettable governor.

At the time, I thought he was unwilling to lose popularity in Hollywood. But maybe his wife undermined him instead. Marrying Shriver was not a smart move on his part.

You’d think Arnold an okay guy if you ever met him but he isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer. He’s manipulable.

Tying together many of the hard challenges we face is the broader cost crisis. In a recent survey, 61 percent of young adults in California said they can’t afford to live here. California should never be a place where only the well-off can lead a good life.

I’ve seen the Section 8 rent-controlled properties that California does. The parasite lives well here, too.

It starts with housing, perhaps our most overwhelming challenge right now. We all know the problem. There’s too much demand and too little supply. And that is happening in large part because too many cities and counties aren’t even planning for how to build. Some are flat out refusing to do anything at all.

That.s why I have committed $750 million for a major new incentive package for communities to do the right thing. $250 million in support to cities and counties to update their housing plans, revamp their zoning process, and get more housing entitled. $500 million more in grants when they achieve these milestones.

You… you’re going to pay bureaucrats to do the job they’re already paid to do? Can you please be a little less overt with the bribes? The other States in the Union are already staring at us.

If we want a California for All, we have to build housing for all.

I want to support local governments that do what’s right, like Anaheim and Santa Rosa. But there must be accountability for those that don’t.

There’s that Unity of (My) Vision again. Newsom wants to centralize political control of California. Northern California is particularly notorious for hostility to Sacramento, although it rarely reaches the point of civil disobedience. The region around Mount Shasta regularly tries to secede and create the state of Jefferson, IIRC.

I’ve said it before, there’s a lot of Heritage Americans in California who don’t like the way things are going in this state. Looks like Newsom hates us as much as his predecessor did.

Two weeks ago, the state of California sued the city of Huntington Beach for failing to meet its obligations on affordable housing. Let me tell you, as a former mayor, the last thing I wanted to do was start my term by suing a city. But they left us no choice.

Gavin Newsom’s target here is Travis Allen, who led Huntington Beach and Los Alamitos in opposition against Sacramento’s treason in declaring sanctuary statehood. I blogged on this before:

Travis Allen.jpg

Travis Allen is a California hero. He ranks with Don Grundmann for “most sane California politician”. Sickening that a lawsuit against him for loyalty to America was one of Newsom’s first priorities as governor.

This isn’t about picking on Huntington Beach, they happened to be first because of a statute of limitations. There are 47 other cities across California that are not complying with their planning requirements in one way or another.

“Their” planning requirements?

Some cities are trying, like Clovis. But others are not, like Wheatland, Huntington Park, and Montebello. I am inviting these cities. leaders to sit down next week for a candid conversation. I don’t intend to file suit against all 47, but I’m not going to preside over neglect and denial. These cities need to summon the political courage to build their fair share of housing.

Fair share of housing? Wheatland’s population is 3,400. They grow walnuts there. Newsom is making open threats against the tiniest of his political opponents.

What’s the real reason you are going after these people, Governor?

I also want to acknowledge other factors beyond city planning that have limited our ability to provide housing.

In recent years, we’ve expedited judicial review on CEQA for professional sports. It’s time we do the same thing for housing.

That’s the California Environmental Quality Act, a 1970s laws that allows environmentalists to shut down private construction projects at will. If you’ve ever heard of “Environment Impact Reports”, CEQA is their daddy. The “expedited review for professional sports” refers to fast-tracking environmental approval of new pro sports stadiums, a critically underfunded infrastructure crisis in California. /sarc

I want to applaud the efforts by home builders and labor leaders, who together are working to forge a compromise to accelerate production.

But there is no way we can achieve our ambitious targets unless we train a skilled workforce big enough to meet this challenge . and those workers deserve wages high enough to support their families.

Good thing you have all those Mary Sue Single Mothers on retainer. I’m sure they’d love to build you some tract housing and aquifer wells in thanks for all the welfare you’ve given them.

Let.s encourage this progress, bring more people to the table, and get something big done. And while we’re at it, let’s not forget the commitments many of us made after Prop 10 failed last year.

The pressures on vulnerable renters didn’t go away after the election. We need new rules to stabilize neighborhoods and prevent evictions, without putting small landlords out of business. I want the best ideas from everyone in this chamber. Here is my promise to you, get me a good package on rent stability this year and I will sign it.

Gavin Newsom is self-admittedly incompetent. Even his existence is illegal per new State laws against bullying.

Next, if we’re serious about taming the cost crisis we need affordable healthcare for all Californians.

OH MY DOG ARE YOU KIDDING ME? We need socialist health care in order to keep costs down??? He’s not honest enough for even a snarking.

[skipping ahead]

That.s why our budget devotes more than $1 billion to increase rates and address the [medical] provider shortage.

This investment will also allow us to increase access to preventative health measures like -immunizations, trauma screenings, and mental health services. And it provides $100 million for reproductive health and family planning.

More “transparency” into the lives of proletariats, more $$$ for welfare queens.

As we pursue the long-term goal of single payer financing, let us make a down-payment now by expanding Medi-Cal coverage to all Californians up to age 26, regardless of their immigration status.

The definition of treason is aiding and abetting foreigners in defiance of Federal policy.

[skipping ahead]

Despite our rising wages, working families in California today barely earn more than they did a decade ago.


That.s why, with your support, we will provide a cost of living refund by expanding the earned income tax credit to a million more Californians who need it the most. For families with kids under the age of six, they.ll see their benefit go up by as much as three times.

What if I refuse to give my support? Will you back down on this or incarcerate me?

It.s time to develop a new modern compact for California’s changing workforce. This is much bigger than Dynamex.

Dynamex was a company that reclassified all of its employees as independent contractors to get around labor laws. Read more at the link below. I have no strong feelings on it myself but the case was influential… I believe Lyft/Uber use the same business model.

California needs a comprehensive statewide strategy to uplift and upskill our workers, to ensure technological advancements in AI, blockchain, big data, are creating jobs, not destroying them, and to reform our institutions so that more workers have an ownership stake in their sweat equity.

I thought we already had a super-educated workforce. Did those PhDs not come with marketable skills?

We will appoint a new Commission on California’s Workforce & Future of Work. We will bring together leaders from labor and business . both the public and private sectors. Their assignment is to come up with new ideas to expand worker opportunity without extinguishing innovation or flexibility.

You incompetent turd bucket, Newsom. You didn’t see Trump begging other people to solve his problems, did you? You will never be one-tenth the leader that Orange Man is.

[skipping ahead]

At my inauguration, I quoted the Sermon on the Mount about a house that did not fall in the face of floods and storms, because it was founded upon a rock. … As St. Paul said, .we are many parts but one body.” We are all diminished when one of us struggles to lead a good life.

Newsom ends his speech by invoking Scripture to justify his humanist rebellion against God. No, he’s not even doing that. He’s just mocking God during a victory lap.

Remember the story of the registered nurse in Paradise who was sitting in traffic, trying to escape the fire, as flames started to engulf his car. He thought, .this is it.” He recorded a goodbye video for his family. Then a miracle occurred: a bulldozer cleared burning cars out of his path. At that point, he could have driven away as fast as possible. That’s what a lot of people would have done.

Remember the town of Wheatland that Newsom is threating into compliance with the Globalist agenda? It’s less than 100 miles from Paradise.

Instead, he turned his car around and drove straight to the hospital in the middle of town, where he worked in the ICU. He and his colleagues started treating injured people. Then the hospital caught fire. They moved patients to a helipad 100 yards away as fast as they could.

Every single one of them was safely evacuated.

When he was asked why he did this . why he drove back through the fire when he could have saved himself . he shrugged and said, .This is what we do..

There ain’t gonna be much more of that male martyrdom in the future. One wonders how Newsom plans to retaliate against us. Probably not at all; he probably expects us to keep showing up and dying.

I believe in our state. And I know that the best is yet to come.

Thank you.

You will go to Eternal Hell, Gavin Newsom, for the many crimes you commit against God and California. Your speech was nothing but admissions of incompetence, promises of betrayal against national security, promises of loot to feral women and foreign nationals, threats against cities great & small who peacefully oppose your illegal, immoral, genocidal agenda and a Utopian vision of Government as God that is, by far, the most violent and bloodthirsty religion in recorded history.

Humanity will never reach its best until you reach your final destination. You and your LGBT cronies.

On the bright side, thanks for calling out some of your enemies. Now I know where to look for allies… and the stories the lamestream media won’t cover.


High Speed Rail Refund!

This story is likely to get buried under the national emergency declaration but Trump did something new: after Cali Governor Gavin Newsom cancelled a hideously mismanaged high speed railway project connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco, Trump demanded Newsom’s administration repay the billions given him for the railway by the Federal gov’t.

Trump Demands Gavin Newsom Return $3.5 Billion for Canceled Bullet Train; Newsom: It’s .California’s Money. Now

By Joel B. Pollack, 13 February 2019

President Donald Trump demanded Wednesday evening that the State of California return $3.5 billion in federal funds after Gov. Gavin Newsom canceled most of the state’s high-speed rail project, saying it was too expensive.

.California has been forced to cancel the massive bullet train project after having spent and wasted many billions of dollars,. the president tweeted. .They owe the Federal Government three and a half billion dollars. We want that money back now. Whole project is a “green” disaster!.

I like Trump’s “management by Twitter” style. Not only does it fit the average voter’s attention span, most topics are simple enough to be explained or rebutted in 140 characters or less.

This is an attack vector even I hadn’t thought of: Require state gov’ts to finish whatever they take Federal money to do or hold them accountable! Bwahaha!

Newsom responded that it was .California’s money.:

“Fake news. We’re building high-speed rail, connecting the Central Valley and beyond.

“This is CA.s money, allocated by Congress for this project. We’re not giving it back.

“The train is leaving the station . better get on board!

“(Also, desperately searching for some wall $$??)”

Lame! “This is CA.s money, allocated by Congress for this project” is an oxymoron. But I love Newsom’s feeble heckle.

Newsom devoted the opening portion of his first “State of the State” address Tuesday to attacking Trump and his policies on the border. Yet he then bowed to conservative criticism . and, arguably, to fiscal reality . by canceling the high-speed rail project championed by his predecessors.

I just gotta fisk his SOS speech.

The governor added that while the bullet train would no longer connect San Francisco and Los Angeles, as first envisioned, the state would still continue “phase one” of the project between the rural towns of Bakersfield and Merced. .I know that some critics will say this is a “train to nowhere,’. he said. “But that’s wrong and offensive..

Not only is it right, but this is exactly why Sacramento wants to criminalize being “offensive”. Telling politicians they’re lying sacks of shit is offensive… and backing it up with photographic evidence like this, doubleplus thoughtcrime offensive:

Newsom added that the state had to continue the project if it wanted to keep the federal funds it had taken: .I am not interested in sending $3.5 billion in federal funding that was allocated to this project back to Donald Trump..

There it is. He’s not shutting down “Phase 1” because if he did, he’d have to repay the money to Congress that he claimed doesn’t belong to Congress.

The money was granted to California as part of President Barack Obama’s stimulus, which set aside .$8 billion in federal stimulus money to create 13 high-speed rail corridors,. the New York Times reported at the time.

Obama pressured states to take the cash . which Democrat-governed states eagerly did. But the Republican wave of 2010 brought new governors to office, and several rejected their state’s high-speed rail plans as costly and unnecessary.

State governments said no to free Federal money? How did THAT story not break?

Hmm… $8b for 13 rail corridors. $3.5b of that went to 1 rail corridor in California. Maybe Obama wanted massive concessions of authority while offering most gov’ts barely enough money for a gift basket in return.

California has already spent over $5 billion on the high-speed rail project . roughly the same amount that Trump had requested for the border wall.

So, we’ve already spent $15b, not $5b. Always triple the official figure. *checks* Wikipedia claims we’ve spent $10.6b. Only double? Shrug, okay. It’s only zeroes.

Wikipedia also gives the official length of the Bakersfield-Merced line at 110 miles so the cost thus far, nothing operational yet, is $100,000,000 per mile. That’s at least two orders of magnitude away from justifiable.

Now if Trump wants to win my heart, he’ll seize $3.5b worth of California assets as collateral. How much is the land along the Mexican border worth? Outside of San Diego, I’m guessing not much. Might be enough left in the budget for a new military base across the street from the Capitol building, to visibly remind California’s leaders who they owe loyalty to. We could call it Fort Sacramento. Or Fort Sack-A-Mental.


Choose the Form of the Destructor 9!

Three Yale girls want to stop fraternities from harassing women… by joining them! “He groped me! Let me live in his frat house as punishment!”

Women claiming sexual harassment at Yale fraternities take unexpected legal action

By CBS News, 12 February 2019

Three female students are suing Yale University and nine of its fraternities, asking a federal court to force fraternities to accept women as members. They accuse Yale and the fraternities of allowing “dangerous environments in which sexual misconduct thrived.”…

Anna McNeil, Ellie Singer, and Ry Walker said they’ve had enough of inappropriate behavior by men at Yale fraternity parties. Asked whether they’ve ever been sexually assaulted at one of the parties, all three raised their hands.

Place your bets! Are these women attractive enough to be raped?

“Someone came up from behind me and started grinding on me and then actually pulled up my skirt,” Walker said.

“I was groped from behind. A lot of people were grinding against me from behind, I couldn’t see them,” McNeil said.

Women Sue Yale Over a Fraternity Culture They Say Enables Harassment - The New York Times

Left to right, Anna McNeil, Ellie Singer and Ry Walker. I can believe Anna was groped–long hair, big boobs–but Walker is lying about being desirable. Nobody wants a fat Diversity case with a Halfro. Ellie’s crudely cut hair is proof she hates men.

In a lawsuit, they alleged “female undergraduates risk sexual harassment and assault by attending fraternity events.” They said men “deny female students admission… based on their appearance, verbally harass them, grind against them, grab them, and grope them.”

“Why do you want to be part of a culture that you’re alleging promotes sexual misconduct?” Oliver asked.

Damn good question! If you’re that unwelcome then why not stay away? Why make a literal Federal case out of a few groups not wanting you as live-in members?

“A fraternity party wasn’t any of our first choice, but it was kind of the only choice for the first couple of months at school,” McNeil said.

I want to party!

“It speaks to the way that fraternities dominate the social culture at Yale,” Walker said, adding, “Those are the places that are open late at night. And those are the spaces that some of our friends are hosting parties in.”

I want to party late with my friends!

“Fraternities offer a vast network of privileges to their members. They offer connections, they offer help networking,” Singer said.


“Some people might argue sororities do the same thing,” Oliver pointed out.

“Sororities don’t tend to have nearly the same connections as fraternities. Fraternities often have people, I think, in higher positions of power. And certainly on campus, they occupy a much higher social space,” Singer said.

Despite all 9,000 female-centric initiatives, departments, laws and related organizations? Women are catered to so much, are academics even a thing anymore?

Their lawsuit against Yale and nine fraternities argues “‘separate but equal’ Greek life reinforces gender norms, stereotypes, and prejudices.” They’re seeking class action status, asking the court to award damages and to order policy changes, including “fully integrating women” at Yale’s fraternities.

I can hear the Yale recruiter: “We don’t have any financial aid to offer you but the first thing we teach in Women’s Studies is how to collect punitive damages from innocent men via frivolous lawsuits. Think of all the dick you’ll get when the boys realize you can be as mean as them!”

CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman said the case is “enormously complicated.” She’s confused by what she sees as the lawsuit’s contradictory goals.

“If I am someone who goes into a party at the only place available for me to socialize, which is a fraternity, and I am being groped and sexually assaulted and in an environment that I think is unsafe, why do I want to join the fraternity? Why don’t I want the fraternity banned?” Klieman said.

“I think I speak for all of us when I say that banning fraternities isn’t counter to our objectives. We’re adopting the kind of gender-integration model because we think it’s one that’s, you know, more feasible, that’s worked similarly in other contexts in the past,” McNeil said.

This is a variation on the age-old prostitution debate. Are they victims of male oppression or empowered wimmin being equal with men?

The women are part of a group which has repeatedly filed complaints asking Yale to regulate fraternities. “Yale’s response has been deliberately indifferent. Yale has known about the problem of fraternity-related discrimination and sexual misconduct for at least a decade,” said their lawyer, David Tracey.

David Tracey | Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP

Mr. Tracey. Male Feminist is becoming a physiognometric template. A good case of diplomat ears… see how the middle of the inner ear cup pokes out past the outer ear cup? For the rest of his face… well, a mullet would be as good as a sex change. I’m paying attention to the flattening of the lower eyelid while the upper eyelid remains rounded. That seems common on male feminist faces and is, I think, a precursor to both the squiggle-eyes of pedoface and the heavy lidding/crows-feet of sexually unwanted men. Don’t quote me yet, though. This is original research. What universities used to do.

Pledges of one fraternity allegedly posed for a photo outside the Yale women’s center with a sign reading: “We love Yale sluts.”

Allegedly, hell. The Internet never forgets!

Yale University "Sluts" Strike Back At Sexist Frat Boys

Peaceful protests of love bring a tear to my eye. Next time, bigger sign, lads! You’re doing this for posterity!

Another fraternity was banned after pledges reportedly paraded around chanting “no means yes.”

Generation Z will be A-OK.

A third fraternity faced allegations of turning away women of color because they wanted “white girls only.”

This is Ry Walker’s whining.

Singer said the optimal outcome of the lawsuit would be a “paradigm shift.”

“Right now, students are forced to make a choice between having a social life and not feeling safe at parties or feeling safe but barely being able to go out at all. We want Yale to take decisive action to make that change so people no longer are forced to make that choice,” Singer said.

Only a skank could have trouble deciding between being safe and getting molested for a social life. There are other options, like homework! I’m being serious! This is a university! You aren’t supposed to stay up late getting drunk & groped! Aw, man, I just dated myself.

I dug a bit deeper and found out these three women are part of a student group called Engender, today’s reminder that witch burnings were a good idea. Engender has been trying to break open male fraternities while technically but not actually advocating the breaking of sororities.

Women attend SigEp rush events

By Hailey Fuchs & Britton O’Daly, 23 January 2017

Over the weekend, dozens of women attended the first set of rush events for the Sigma Phi Epsilon fraternity, which voted over winter break to open its rush process to female students, but will not offer them bids because of the organization’s national regulations.

The female students in attendance were mostly members of the student group Engender, which was created last fall to advocate for a more inclusive social environment on campus. The group currently has 50 members, only a portion of whom are women, according to Will McGrew .18, a SigEp member and Engender co-director.

That’s sad, man. Women don’t want women’s rights as badly as some men want to give them those rights. Wait… McGrew was a frat member and Engender co-director simultaneously?

Will McGrew

Treacherous mole. Per his LinkedIn, he’s a co-FOUNDER of Engender. He betrayed his fraternity in the name of Convergence.

.[Rushees] were curious to know what the goal was,. said Larissa Martinez .20, another Engender co-director, who attended a rush event on Friday. .Most of them gave me positive feedback on it..

Brief segue:

McKinney Boyd High Valedictorian Larissa Martinez went viral this month when she revealed her undocumented status in her graduation speech. The 19-year-old says her decision to talk wasn’t hers alone.

.I am one of the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the shadows of the United States. I decided to stand before you today because this might be my only chance to convey the truth to all of you that undocumented immigrants are people too,. Larissa told her graduation class.

Nobody accused you of not being a human being, you trespasser. You gonna pay for that education?

There is a system to help young, undocumented immigrants who are called Dreamers. DACA, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, lets qualified students avoid deportation for a time. Larissa doesn’t qualify because she arrived three years too late. Miguel Solis, a Dallas school trustee who also helps train Hispanic leaders, says she should qualify.

You have to go back, Solis. You refuse to obey our laws.

.By her telling her story,. Solis explains, .I can guarantee you there.ll be a multiplier effect for even more undocumented students who know the system isn’t working for them, to come out of the shadows and say we demand something different..

That’s exactly what the people of the United States are afraid of. You want the trespassers to band together and make demands of we who belong here.

End segue.

The fraternity’s change in policy came after a group of female students expressed interest in joining. Tyler Morley .18, the president of SigEp, declined to comment for this article, but told the News in a statement last week that his organization hopes that the inclusion of women at rush events will allow the fraternity to become a more welcoming place while adhering to the bylaws of their national organization that confer membership only to men.

Okay, I see what happened here. Morley chose to let women in even though the rules said the frat was men only, making his the only frat to let women even try in 2017, and the parent organization won the resulting battle. This time around, Engender is resorting to a Federal lawsuit to break in.

Good on the parent organization for crushing the entryism effort. One quick quote:

“SigEp allowed several Engender members to rush events, but the fraternity ultimately denied them membership due to national chapter restrictions on accepting women.”

According to Engender’s leadership, male rushees at the events were open to discussing why women were in attendance.

McGrew noted that the move has sparked on campus conversations about exclusivity as well as the motivation behind those women rushing SigEp. However, McGrew questioned why the actions of these women are seen as “strange.”

Bald-faced lying. Women pushing into a never-before-violated male space is exactly the sort of thing that ought to be seen as strange. Especially when she wants in and simultaneously claims to have been rayyyped inside, although the lawsuit was a couple years after this article.

A registered student organization, Engender hopes to start dialogue about implicit inequalities in Yale’s social life. Co-Directors McGrew, Martinez and Genevieve Esse .19 said that while the women’s requests to rush mainly challenge fraternities as male-dominated social spaces, Engender’s mission applies to all exclusive groups on campus.

.Engender supports open access to social events for Yale students regardless of gender, race, class or sexuality,. the group said in a statement to the News. .We hope to work with as many of Yale’s fraternities and other student groups as possible to develop a more inclusive and equitable campus climate..

You meant sororities, did you not, when you said “fraternities and other student groups”? I bet there’s a lot of horny young men who’d like to be the first into Barbie Central.

Eh, maybe not. Chicks are fun sport but any intelligent guy would lose his mind living among them. That’s why men abandon male spaces when women push in.

Esse added that the group will soon have an official website and plans to publish an op-ed in the News this week.

For the curious, here’s a link. Might not have been what she was referring to, however.

Female students interviewed who attended or planned to attend rush events at SigEp expressed caution, saying that they would feel uncomfortable in a social setting where they would not be seen as potential brothers, unlike men rushing the fraternity.

First the women are forced to apply, then the men are forced to accept them. Convergence’s work is never done.

.I am interested to see how women approach rush differently because they don’t have the same social motivations as their male counterparts . the women rushing risk social alienation, whereas the men rushing can expect a degree of social inclusion,. said Anna McNeil .20, who plans to attend future rush events this semester.

She also noted that SigEp’s rush process seems less “hostile” than that of other Yale fraternities because it consists of more rush meals and fewer parties.

Surprisingly, she didn’t become a fatso.

The Federal case has no legs. Not only is this an obvious freedom of association issue, but the women making the complaint admit that getting what they want would expose them to high risk for sexual victimhood.

Oh, so that’s the game. Eternal victimhood.


Santa Gave Me A Riot Shield!

Every year I get a new gun. Sacramento times every bushel of new legislation to take effect on the new year and every time, the only thing I can do in response is buy another gun. But how many guns does a man really need? Either you win your first gun battle and loot your enemy’s gun, or you lose your first gun battle and the bad guys will appreciate your stockpile over your dead body.

So this time around, I decided to buy into some gun defense. Bulletproof vests are legal in California, which surprised me (I suppose “vestmen” never commit crimes), but were expensive and had a shelf life of five years or so. Also, I don’t have the storage space for anything that could be described as a “system”.

But then I discovered bulletproof shields.

Currently starting at $300.

The basic Alpha model gives Class IIIA protection, which means it’ll stop any handgun round up to .44 Mag and you might get lucky against a rifle, but that’s sufficient for indoors. Zero maintenance, no shelf life, easy to store and don in the dark, better optics than a paramilitary vest and best of all, it’s also useful in civil unrest situations against thrown rocks and bottles of Antifa piss. This and my hard hat should be an effective SHTF defense without breaking the bank. Especially since I’m a pistolero anyway.

I even found some impressive youTube videos like this one.

Downside is, it’s a lot of weight for most people to wield. I’ve got the size to not feel it but potential buyers should wave a 20lb dumbbell around to get the feel. Pairing it with a hat that can take a headlamp is a good idea, or you can get one of those flashlights that doubles as a taser to carry in your free hand instead of a firearm. The shield doesn’t make a good gun rest, it’s too thin and the handle doesn’t allow a natural supporting-arm position, so either practice one-handed at the range or get the Bravo version, which is designed for tactical use over home defense (at 4x the cost but rated for rifles). The Alpha’s handle makes shield edge strikes easy for the martial artist but of course, it’s not protecting you that way.

I got the Alpha Plus size and it does a good job of covering my critical bits… me being 6’3″.

Next Christmas: titanium shin guards?


Hybristophilia: Amy Murray

Death Row Fan Club is real. A murder in backwoods Missouri illustrates the danger of allowing women to guard dangerous felons.

Wife allegedly used antifreeze to poison husband: Woman planned to marry inmate

By Deborah Kendrick, 8 February 2019

IBERIA, Mo. – Miller County authorities are investigating after a woman is accused of poisoning her husband, then setting their home on fire.

Authorities initially received a call on Dec. 11, 2018, about a house fire on Janice Drive in Iberia, where Joshua Murray’s body was found inside the residence.

The Missouri State Fire Marshal and the Miller County Sheriff’s Office said the fire was determined to be started by Murray’s wife, Amy, after she allegedly poisoned Joshua with antifreeze.

An autopsy showed Murray died of poisoning, and Amy was charged with first-degree murder and armed criminal action.

Amy allegedly started the fire, then left the home and went to a McDonald’s in Osage Beach [GQ: 22 miles away] with her 11-year-old son and dogs. When she returned to the home, she said the house was on fire, and the smoke was too heavy for her to go inside, according to a probable cause statement.

I can’t say she’s a cold-hearted bitch because she brought the dogs to McDonalds. She didn’t want to leave them in the fire. Which is both humane, heh, and evidence of premeditation on the arson. But I can say her lover was not her husband.

The wife. She has a prostitute’s eyes.

joshua murray

Husband Joshua Murray, taken from his obituary.

eugene claypool

Lover Eugene A. Claypool, convicted murderer. Hmm, their faces are similar enough that Amy could have squinted and pretended that Eugene was Joshua’s bad boy twin.

The population of Iberia is 750 so Amy was probably bored, too.

Court documents revealed Amy had worked as a nurse at the Jefferson City Correctional Center and had a romantic relationship with an inmate.

In recorded phone conversations Amy told the inmate, Eugene Claypool, she didn’t want to be married to her husband anymore and she could marry Claypool because Joshua was deceased and “out of the picture,” the documents said. Claypool previously pleaded guilty to second-degree murder.

The Missouri inmate database provides this information about Claypool:

Sentence Summary Life (Life, 10, 15, 7 CC)
Active Offenses MURDER 2ND DEGREE

I tracked down how this burglar turned to murder.

Man Pleads Guilty to Lottery Winner Murder

17 May 2002

SPRINGFIELD, Missouri — As reported by the Associated Press: “A young man who had been expected to withdraw his earlier guilty plea in the Christmas Day killing of a lottery winner decided instead to accept the state’s plea bargain.

“Jeffrey Williamson, 18, pleaded guilty Wednesday to second-degree murder and Greene County Circuit Judge Henry Westbrooke sentenced him to 20 years in prison.

“Williamson also got concurrent sentences of 10 years for armed criminal action, 15 years for first-degree burglary and seven years for first-degree tampering.

“.Co-defendant Eugene Claypool Jr., 21, was sentenced last October to life in prison for second-degree murder and he’ll have to do 25 years before becoming eligible for parole.

“.The two men are convicted of killing Donald Hardwick, a 72-year-old invalid who had won a $1.7 million Missouri Lottery jackpot in 1998. He was slain at his home on Christmas Day 2000.

“Authorities said Williamson and Claypool broke into Hardwick’s Springfield home searching for $10,000 they believed he had there.

“.Prosecutors say Williamson and Claypool searched the house for several hours before going into the room where Hardwick was sleeping.

“The feeble Hardwick, who couldn’t walk without using a walker, awoke and authorities say Claypool tried to restrain him. Williamson reportedly held a couch cushion over the man’s face while Claypool stabbed him multiple times in the chest and throat.

“A Bible was left on the victim’s chest. When his wife, Edna, got up on Christmas morning she noticed a broken kitchen window. She went to tell her husband, who slept in a separate room, but found him dead.”

Home invasion robbery on Christmas Eve, when any loose cash would have already been spent if I’m familiar with that holiday, and when they couldn’t find the dough they took their frustrations out on a cripple. Then tossed a Bible on the victim’s chest which was either mocking God on God’s birthday or Jeffey in a fit of remorse. Either way, bring back the death penalty!

I wonder if Eugene told Amy that he’d found the money? Joshua died at 37 so not much time to make bank from construction, although he was a supervisor. Amy torching the marital home and not being able to collect life insurance isn’t going to help her future financial problems, either. Dreams of an Alpha with Beta Bucks could easily have triggered hypergamy.

State-mandated beliefs that men are the same as women cannot override reality. Amy gained access to sexy-because-dangerous men through prison work, found “twu wuv” with a convicted murderer who resembled her husband and murdered hubby in order to replace hubby with lover.

What did Claypool get out of it? Assuming he claimed to have that $1.7M lottery money hidden away… but couldn’t access it in his current situation…

Amy talked about getting an attorney to get Claypool released from prison early.


Los Angeles City Hall Overrun By Vermin!

Not just the politicians! Actual vermin, from rats the size of possums scurrying around on desks to flea-infested carpets that have already caused at least one case of typhus in a government official. Just when you think God doesn’t care, you discover that your worst enemies have been voluntarily living in Third-World squalor because the alternative is speciesist immigration control and the usage of not-green pesticides.

L.A. City Hall, overrun with rats, might remove all carpets amid typhus fears

By Dakota Smith, 7 February 2019

At a Halloween celebration at City Hall last year, a rat gnawed through a pumpkin put out for decoration.

That wasn’t a Halloween stunt I saw? Eeew!

In another incident, city workers found a dead rodent decomposing in an office ceiling. And then there were the rat droppings spotted on at least two different floors of the downtown building.

L.A. City Hall has a problem with rats . and leaders, fed up with the problem, are calling for an investigation.

City Council President Herb Wesson on Wednesday submitted a motion asking the city to report back on the “scope of vermin and pest control issues” at City Hall and adjoining city buildings.

.Employees shouldn’t have to come to work worried about rodents,. Wesson said in interview. .I intend to do whatever it is we need. to solve the problem.

Starting with a press release announcing the submission of a motion to form an investigative committee to issue a report on the scope of the issues, when your employees can smell the pawprints on their desks. Burn in your self-made bureaucratic Hell, Herb Wesson! Bwahahaha!

The council president said he’s had a series of problems with vermin in his fourth-floor office, as well as fleas in the carpet. Things got so bad that he moved his entire staff out of City Hall to a district office for a few days over the holidays, he said.

HE IS! He’s burning in his own self-made Hell! There is a God in Heaven after all!

2015 Los Angeles County Elections Candidate Guide |

Herb Wesson, melted pedoface.

Wesson also wants the city to come up with a policy to require employees to secure their food after hours and for custodial services to throw out food that’s left out.

If “custodial services” hasn’t been throwing out uneaten food then I found the problem. City Hall hired vibrant migrants instead of their own countrymen for sanitation services and now wonders why its sanitation standards are fixed at “Nicaragua”.

Vanessa Rodriguez, a onetime Wesson spokeswoman, said late last year that she discovered tiny paw prints on papers on her desk. Rodriguez … no longer works for the city.

One smart government employee. All the others are keeping their eyes on the pension while the tide of fleas climbs ever higher on their legs. Only twenty-two more years to go!

That there’s a few pensions we won’t have to fund.

When Elizabeth Greenwood, a deputy city attorney, came down with typhus, she said she suffered a 102-degree fever, spells of vertigo and “the worst headache I have ever had in my life.” She works in City Hall East, a building connected to City Hall.

Greenwood, whose illness was first reported by KNBC-TV, believes she contracted the disease while working in the downtown office. She has not returned to work since November, she said.

.I am actually terrified of entering the building again until they do something.”

While I don’t blame her for not going back, after three months of goldbricking Greenwood should have been fired.

Mayor Eric Garcetti’s spokesman, Alex Comisar, said the mayor “is concerned about recent reports on this issue, and supports the council president’s effort to get to the bottom of it..

Uh-oh. I bet Garcetti would be the Leftoid candidate against Trump next year. If he gets typhus before the debates begin then I’m gonna lose my shirt.


The Nancy Mace Quote

Nancy Mace is a rising star in Republican circles. Women can do as well as a man if only she gets the chance! But the truth is tragic. Nancy Mace’s father, a decorated war hero, wanted a son, didn’t get one, and dirtied his reputation, as well as America’s military traditions, to enact that very belief that there’s no difference between a woman and a man.

This is a comment Nancy recently made in reference to Trump’s SOTU speech and related feminist theatrics. I’ll give the comment in its entirely then go through it again to roast the beans out of it.

https://www facebook com/photo.php?fbid=10155852898697019&set=a.382904607018&type=3&theater

I.m a mom, a businesswoman and a state legislator serving South Carolina. At a young age, I was determined to forge my own path through life. And nearly 20 years ago I became the first female graduate of The Citadel after following in my father’s footsteps. I also have experience starting my own business and in 2017 ran for – and won – a seat in the state legislature, on my own terms.

As women we make a fundamental mistake when we make our identity as women the WHOLE story.

The point of breaking glass ceilings is so that, after they’re broken, it doesn’t matter anymore. The American experiment is built on the premise that if you set a goal, show up on time and work hard, then success is within reach. We can ALL achieve the American dream regardless of our gender.

The identity politics being overplayed by liberal women in Washington, on display last night during the president’s State of the Union last night, further sets women back rather than advancing our futures. Acting like we just earned the right to vote and are held back strictly because of our gender is an enormous disservice to women everywhere.

We don’t need to dress alike.

We don’t need to think alike.

We don’t need to act alike.

We simply need to be present and be working for ALL of the people who elected us.

To business. *GQ dons surgical gloves*

I.m a mom,

The first way you describe yourself is as a mother, to convince other people that you’re someone worth listening to. That’s good. Women being mothers is why the species still exists, not to mention the deep personal satisfaction motherhood gives women. What a waste of resources, however, that motherhood wasn’t enough for you. You had to achieve secondary, workplace accomplishments at the cost of a man having those positions to provide for his family. YuGo girls want to do it all so they don’t have to submit to a husband. YuGos like Nancy.

a businesswoman and a state legislator serving South Carolina.

No submissive woman seeks authority over men. Looking at her busy schedule of graduate school, gossip-startup company and multi-term State official, it’s obvious she’s a mother only in the biological sense. Kids need their mothers but “mom” Nancy had a career to nurture instead.

I presume hubby stayed home with the kids. That’s getting to be a pattern of the New World Order.

At a young age, I was determined to forge my own path through life.

No, you were taught that by your father… wrongly and in violation of your own biology. See, your father, Brig. Gen. Mace, wanted a son and so far as I can tell, you’re his only child, Nancy. No problem, he thought. If he couldn’t have a son then he’d just make one out of you. What could go wrong?

And nearly 20 years ago I became the first female graduate of The Citadel after following in my father’s footsteps.

Care to guess how Nancy broke through the glass ceiling at the Citadel? How she managed to be the first female graduate from a proudly and historically all-male institution? HER FATHER WAS THE COMMANDANT OF THE CITADEL AT THAT TIME!!! No man gave her grief because she were the Boss’ special snowflake, that’s how she broke through the “glass ceiling”!

More than that, the first class of women had four members. How did Nancy manage to be the first of them? By graduating a year early. Magna Cum Laude, no less. That was shameless, blatant nepotism on her father’s part and it was well-known, too.

Photo Archive | The Citadel External Affairs Office

“Tomboy” doesn’t begin to describe Cadet Nancy. She was essentially a transsexual.

Here’s an excerpt from Brig. Gen. Mace’s retirement honorarium:

Whereas, Brigadier General J. Emory Mace was appointed commandant of The Citadel in 1997 several months after The Citadel admitted its first class of women cadets; and

Begging the question of whether Mace took the job specifically to push his daughter through.

Whereas, his leadership during a dramatic period of transition from an all-male to a coeducational Corps of Cadets proved invaluable to the school as it adjusted to the change; and

I detect an undercurrent of sarcasm here.

Whereas, Brigadier General Mace’s own beloved daughter, Nancy Mace, became The Citadel’s first female graduate in 1999; and

Everybody knew Nancy was Commandant’s little girl.

Whereas, under his able leadership and watchful eye, ninety-five women have graduated from the cadet program and currently the 1900-member Corps of Cadets includes about one hundred twenty women; and

After refusing to tell his own daughter NO, Commandant had no grounds to tell any other man’s daughter NO.

Whereas, in addition to spearheading the evolution of The Citadel, he also managed to strengthen and improve military training at the institution; and

Is there precedent for giving backhanded honorariums to brass who royally screw up?

Whereas, he instituted tougher physical fitness requirements of the Corps resulting in ninety-seven percent of all cadets passing the Army Physical Fitness Test; and

I ask because a military prep academy should have this level of basic military fitness from its founding. The Army PFT is a minimum standard, yes?

Daddy ruined Nancy’s life and the institution of the Citadel by pushing her though so fast and “honored” that she’s either Cadet America or a fraud perpetrated by the highest military rank. Had Daddy given her the chance and then washed her out, however, then everybody would have known that women don’t belong in the military.

But even giving her the chance ruined the Citadel’s reputation forever. “The first female cadet was the Commandant’s daughter! Favoritism!”

Because of an entire generation of such fathers, young men today have no place in their own society and as a direct result, are hated by the young women who whore themselves to “noble savages” out of disgust at the men who did not succeed because they were not allowed to try. The seat Nancy took at the Citadel was one that a man didn’t have, and when men aren’t allowed a chance to participate in society, they tend to… not participate in society.

Speaking of men, here’s Nancy’s husband:

Those haunted eyes! Deep, lidded eyes and crows-feet are becoming common on the faces on men these days. I wouldn’t describe any of them as high-SMV. Meanwhile, Nancy is developing that “Mommy Frog-Lips” look of women who don’t raise their own kids. Notice she’s posed higher than her husband, dominating this family portrait.

I also have experience starting my own business and in 2017 ran for – and won – a seat in the state legislature, on my own terms.

First you displace men, then you take power over men… so you can fix the social problems created by your refusal to submit in the first place. Before society pretended men & women were the same and babies came from India & Mexico, we didn’t have so many social ills that most schools now have a permanent law enforcement presence.

Her business was a gossip/marketing/networking setup like every other empowered businesswoman without an in-house male nerd. Coincidentally, several politicians made use of it prior to Nancy stepping into politics herself in 2013.

As women we make a fundamental mistake when we make our identity as women the WHOLE story.

It’s not a mistake. Women need to be victims of “the system” because women can’t survive in a merit system. Nancy herself couldn’t survive except for Commandant Daddy’s support. This is something cuckservatives can’t accept: women can’t survive without men. That is the WHOLE story of what’s wrong with modern society.

A kind man will not give women even the chance to prove her merit because 1. she is almost certainly inferior to a man, 2. men are tempted to rig the system for woman’s benefit, 3. the number of women who can compete against men is so small that gender integration isn’t worth the effort and 4. men can’t have babies.

The point of breaking glass ceilings is so that, after they’re broken, it doesn’t matter anymore.

The point of breaking glass ceilings is to force your way into male spaces, Nancy, to usurp male authority. Having done so yourself, you don’t want anybody to follow you and dilute your glory & status. Male Privilege much?

The American experiment is built on the premise that if you set a goal, show up on time and work hard, then success is within reach.

The American experiment is not showing up on time for gender-confused nepotism. It is 1. the freedom to worship Christ as a man sees fit, 2. liberty, the combination of authority with responsibility and 3. small, weak, local government.

You, Nancy, are disobedient to Christ (if you even claim to follow him) because you seized authority in defiance of your responsibilities as a mother and don’t tell us you became a legislator to shrink budgets and fire headcount. That’s not what you have been doing.

We can ALL achieve the American dream regardless of our gender.

Gender is a part of your identity and capability. You might as well claim that the America dream can be achieved regardless of our species. Meanwhile, if your “gender” is neither cis-male nor cis-female then I hope your version of the American Dream includes growing warts on your privates.

Speaking of, the American dream is not the American experiment. The American dream is a man keeping HIS family in HIS home and none shall make him afraid. Wow, we’ve come a long way, baby.

The identity politics being overplayed by liberal women in Washington, on display last night during the president’s State of the Union last night, further sets women back rather than advancing our futures.

Overplayed? Identity politics was never supposed to be how America did government in the first place. Given the chance, I would set you women back to 1780 Colonial and you would like it because as much as you envy us men our “privilege”, what will give you lasting happiness is keeping our homes in good order. That, or a bottle of cheap wine a day. Your choice. For now.

Cuckservatives are not helping women by helping women act like men. They are not men.

Acting like we just earned the right to vote and are held back strictly because of our gender is an enormous disservice to women everywhere.

You women NEVER earned the right to vote. You were given power far in excess of your responsibility because Adam chose to encourage Eve’s rebellion instead of remaining loyal to God his Creator and Benefactor… but the Church forgot to teach that for a generation.

We don’t need to dress alike.

But you women do anyway.

We don’t need to think alike.

But you women do anyway.

We don’t need to act alike.

But you women do anyway. It’s who you are. You are women, not men. Heck, you women even LOOK alike, especially you feminists.

Nancy Mace Gets Tea Party Nod | FITSNews

5 Questions: Senate primary candidate Nancy Mace - South ...

She could have passed for Nancy Pelosi before that witch went liche. The flat, dead eyes, jutting chin, thin lips, high cheeks. It’s like both Nancies were pressed from the same mold, or at least, the same graduate school of political science before taking the same path into politics. (Okay, Pelosi’s eyes are much worse.)

Nancy Mace, Cindy Boatwright duel in S.C. District 99 ...

For comparison, on the left is Cindy Boatwright, Nancy’s recent election challenger. Freaky how their physiognomies agree.

Celebrating Citadel Diversity Milestones in the 50th and ...

Since I’m showing pictures, here’s Nancy Mace’s cadet photo. It’s painfully obvious that her father had wanted a son. But she tried to please Daddy and now, she has as little femininity as the average reptile… referring to gender dimorphism, not cold-bloodedness. The latter is just testosterone.

We simply need to be present and be working for ALL of the people who elected us.

You don’t work for us, Legislator. You work for Christ first and the American experiment second. The “people” don’t need a State-powered mother figure… least of all the people who actually want one.

Because, you see, the people often want what isn’t good for them, just like your father. He twisted you into a parody of a son while the modern voter twists government into a parody of a god. It is the job of healthy government, and healthy manhood, more often than not, to tell the people NO. No, God doesn’t want that. No, this isn’t healthy. No, we can’t afford that.

No, Nancy, you are not a man and never were. But because you tried, you weren’t much of a woman, either.


Trump Pardons Alice Marie Johnson: Baby Momma, Drug Lord, False Priest

Trump sold out in his State Of The Union address, currying the approval of enemies that have no approval to give. (He listened to Kim Kardashian, seriously?) It’s fitting that he backed out of his Building the Wall gov’t shutdown in order to give the speech in the first place.

A specific case highlighting Trump’s fall is ACLU cause celebre Alice Marie Johnson, a helpless, unfortunate black grandmother who by making a couple bad life decisions in desperation, ended up an innocent with a life sentence in Federal prison.

Yeah, right.

This Single Mother is Serving Life Without Parole for the Most Absurd Reason You Can Imagine

By Gabriel Grand, 16 November 2013

When Alice Marie Johnson was convicted of drug conspiracy and money laundering in 1997, she had never before seen the inside of a prison cell. Her haunting story sheds light on the lives of the thousands of Americans . most of whom are black and come from poor backgrounds . sentenced to die behind bars for nonviolent drug-related crimes.

Masterminding a cocaine-smuggling and money-laundering operation for the Cali Cartel does not sound like an absurd reason for life without parole.

A single mother struggling to make ends meet for her five children, Johnson was married and had her first pregnancy at age 15. Though the school board of her high school in Olive Branch, Mississippi tried to force her to drop out, Johnson refused, graduating with honors two years later before going on to college.

Ghetto trash baby momma. Here are her victims: her own children! “You should quit school, marry the father and raise your kids.” “Eeevil patriarchy! Muh edducashun is more important! This girl’s gwan to colledge! Now gimmie some child care and WIC papers!”

Things went downhill for Johnson in 1989, when she and her husband divorced. The following year, she lost her job of 10 years at the FedEx Corporation due to a gambling addiction. With no way to pay her bills, Johnson filed for bankruptcy in 1991 and her house was foreclosed on. In a moment of tragedy for the entire family, Johnson’s youngest son, Cory, was killed in a scooter accident in 1992.

Let’s read between a few lines. Her husband interfered with her gambling habit so she frivorced him out of “her” house. Then her gambling habit ruined her anyway. Take the victimhood out of “she lost her job of 10 years at the FedEx Corporation due to a gambling addiction” and it becomes “she lost her job of 10 years at the FedEx Corporation when she was caught embezzling funds to fuel her gambling addiction, but then she played the race card to avoid prosecution”. That money laundering conviction is coming into focus.

Having hit rock bottom, Johnson began to associate with people who were involved with drug dealing. She became wrapped up in a lucrative operation that transported cocaine to Memphis, Tennessee for distribution. In 1993, she was arrested and accused, along with 15 others, on various drug and money laundering charges.

Being a ghetto rat with no moral compass, Johnson called up the Chads she knew and got involved in interstate cocaine trafficking. Baby needs a new pair of shoes!

At trial, prosecutors convinced 10 of her co-conspirators to testify against her in exchange for reduced or, in some cases, dropped charges. Johnson admits she acted as a go-between, relaying coded messages like “everything is straight” by telephone, but says that she never personally made drug deals or sold drugs.

The leaders employ disposable minions to do the risky parts of the business. The money laundering conviction means Alice wasn’t a message courier who never carried the dope; she was handling the money in addition to communications. That sounds a LOT like management. Ten of her 15 associates agreed.

Even the Federalist got this one right. The following link, which I won’t go into, describes Alice exchanging millions of dollars for tons of Colombian cocaine. That FedEx experience paid off!

Nevertheless, while the co-defendants who testified against her were given sentences ranging from probation without jail time to 10 years, Johnson was sentenced to life in prison without parole, plus 25 years.

Sounds normal. Prosecutors are more interested in the higher rungs of organized crime than the lower rungs because they’re politicians. Busting a kingpin is good public relations. Putting an endless succession of “nonviolent” vibrant losers in jail, not so much.

Johnson is now 58, and her 16 years of incarceration have taken a toll on her and her family. “It feels like I am sitting on death row,” she says. “Unless things change, I will never go home alive.” Meanwhile, Johnson has been unable to care for her mother, who has Alzheimer’s disease. Her only son dropped out of school and is now in prison himself.

Her only surviving son followed Alice’s example into crime. Whose fault is that, Alice? Not society’s. Not Daddy’s either, he wasn’t there.

Anna Marie Johnson is just one of more than 110 case studies of prisoners serving life without parole for nonviolent offenses from a recently-released ACLU report, titled, “A Living Death.” Her daughter’s words echo the anguish expressed by countless relatives of those doomed to die behind bars for low-level, nonviolent drug and property crimes.

They keep beating the “nonviolent” drum like it means something. As if drug and property crimes can’t destroy an innocent man’s… life… oh. Right. Women aren’t effective at violence, which means criminalizing only “violent” crime is a sneaky way to criminalize being male. “Nonviolent crime” is a pussy pass. If some male Dindus also benefit then that’s fine so long as Ghetto Barbie wants to hump him.

If nonviolent property crimes were evil then frivorce would be evil.

“The punishments these people received are grotesquely out of proportion to the crimes they committed,” said Jennifer Turner, ACLU human rights researcher and author of the report, in an ACLU press release. Possession of a crack pipe, acting as a middleman in the sale of $10 of marijuana, possession of a bottle cap containing a trace amount of heroin too small to weigh, selling of a single crack rock, and shoplifting a $159 jacket were among the crimes featured in the report that resulted in sentences of life without parole.

Wait for it…

The ACLU report identifies more than 3,200 prisoners in nine states and the federal system who are serving life without parole. Four out of five are Black or Hispanic. Virtually all come from poor backgrounds…

Wait for it…

…and many committed one or more (mostly nonviolent) crimes prior to their conviction.

Ah, there it is. Three strikes laws can be a bitch, eh? One carjacking and one “snitches get stitches” and the next thing you know, you’re doing life in prison for shoplifting a jacket. I bet Alice had a record prior to her interstate produce deliveries. Those unfortunate gambling debts, y’know?

In many cases, “three-strikes” laws and other habitual offender statutes gave judges no choice but to issue the harshest possible punishment aside from death. For more than 80 percent of the people surveyed by the ACLU, a life without parole sentence was mandatory.

“I think a life sentence for what you have done in this case is ridiculous; it is a travesty.” said Federal District Judge James R. Spencer while sentencing a man for selling small amounts of crack cocaine in a run-down section of Richmond, Virginia to support his own drug addiction. “I don’t agree with it, either. And I want the world and the record to be clear on that. This is just silly. But as I say, I don’t have any choice.”

Judges like Spencer are why voters pass mandatory sentencing laws in the first place. We’re tired of revolving-door justice and hippie Leftoids believing every claim of victimhood and rayyyycism they hear.

As for my charge of being a false priest, Alice is repeatedly described as an ordained minister. What more needs to be said? She openly defies God, in God’s name. But I couldn’t find which denomination ordained her… not the Pentecostals, not the mainlines, not the ELCA. Per the following link:

Alice was ordained by proxy at God’s Millennium Women’s Conference. Meaning, she couldn’t make parole to go on the cruise. Looking them up, they seem to be a conference/convention company sponsored by Mary Kay cosmetics, not any kind of denomination. I noticed this about their leader:

Charlyn Singleton is a much sought after Bible teacher, motivational speaker & health advocate. Charlyn was licensed and ordained to the Gospel ministry by her husband, Pastor Chuck Singleton, Sr. Pastor Loveland Church, in Ontario, California, where she serves as First Lady & as an associate pastor.

You God-Damned Adamic CUCK, Pastor Singleton! You ordained your wife in rebellion to God and she promptly made a career of female minister empowerment.

Candoclemency also has this: [Alice was] ordained in prison Horn of Oil Ceremony by Dr. Linda Holliday of I’ve Chosen Ministries International;

Linda Holliday & Bill Belichick: 5 Fast Facts to Know ...

Married to Bill Belichick of the New England Patriots? No, wait…

Apostle Dr. Linda Holliday's Page - Black Preaching Network

Apostle Linda Holliday. “Horn of Oil anointing” is a generally Charismatic practice, done in reference to Samuel anointing David with a horn of oil. Charismatics do it in hopes of giving the recipient supernatural power and authority. Such efforts to usurp or coerce God’s authority are why the Charismatic Church is dead in its apostasy.

Let me digress on this. 1 Samuel 16:1 “The Lord said to Samuel, .How long will you mourn for Saul, since I have rejected him as king over Israel? Fill your horn with oil and be on your way; I am sending you to Jesse of Bethlehem. I have chosen one of his sons to be king.” Samuel gave David the anointing only under the direct command of God. Charismatics don’t wait for God’s direction on who to set up as a leader or prophet (they often conflate the two roles), they just reenact the little “horn of oil” ceremony as a cargo cult way of forcing God to give them freebies. That is what Saul did, offering the pre-battle sacrifice because the priest Samuel was late in coming, because Saul needed God’s blessing on his schedule and not God’s.

Which is why God sent Samuel to anoint David as Saul’s replacement in the first place. Why do Protestants not read the very Bible we proclaim?

A thirst and a hunger for God, has always been a plight of Sis. Linda. Making that solemn pledge to God by an outward showing of water baptism at the age of 8 years old; at the Starlight Baptist Church where the late Rev. William Nelson McCarty was her tutor in the word and an inspiration to her life. At the age of 14 years she heard the call of God for the ministry, but it was years later that a word of God, in a born again experience, came thru Pastor Howard Richardson of the “Gates of Glory Church.” She deserted religion and entered into a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and in her times of prayer, fasting, and consecration she received the confirmation from God thru his word in (John 15:16.Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that you should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, he may give it you). After hearing that word, she forsook the things of the world to dedicate her life to Jesus and his people.

She heard a call to ministry at the onset of puberty. Not promising. I couldn’t track down Rev. McCarty/Starlight Baptist but Gates of Glory is still under Pastor Richardson. A typical Charismatic church, complete with apostles and prophetesses in its ranks screeching God’s Prophetic Word Salad to the people.

Word for the House (Aug. 2015) - Pastor Howard Richardson, Gates of Glory Church - YouTube

The best pic I could find of Howard Richardson. Not good enough for physiognomy but the gold watch, diamond pinky ring and purple neon in the background are not indications that he’s a humble man of God. As a general rule, pastors shouldn’t have hair styles popularized by the Grateful Dead.

She deserted religion and entered into a personal relationship with Jesus Christ“, unbelievable. Holliday abandoned the basics of Christianity–the rules and practices God gave us for our protection and general education–to focus on becoming one with God… with something that called itself a god, anyway.

Pastor/Evangelist Linda Holliday is now a modern, end-time messenger of God’s Holy Word. She has traverse the United States, Africa, South Korea, Europe, Switzerland, Canada, and the West Indies.

She got her “self-exploration” feminist merit badge.

The anointed power of the Holy Ghost flows thru her with a prophetic word and the gift of knowledge, that brings healing and deliverance to all that will receive. There are no boundaries. She crosses every walk of life as she goes behind prison walls, to the homeless on the streets, children’s homes, schools, communities and to churches of all congregational sizes. Her ministry to women (.God.s Millennium Women.) has been profoundly life changing. Many have been ordained and have come to the revelation of the call of ministry on their lives.

Including unrepentant gang boss Alice Johnson.

Dr. Linda Holliday has attained many accomplishments. She was ordained by Pastor Annie White of Dallas, Texas and is under charter granted from the state of Texas 1953 AD, licensed through Victory New Testament Fellowship International, Pastor Donald Skelton. She holds a Doctor of Divinity degree in the field of Evangelism from Rialto Community Bible College in Rialto, California.

Pastor Annie White installed at St. John?s Lutheran - My Gateway News ? Serving Elmwood, Spring ...

Pastor Annie White’s first day on the job. Her eyes are coldly rational and if I have the shape right, the bridge of her nose indicates strong willpower.

Johnson was ordained by Singleton & Holliday who was ordained by Annie White who was ordained by the Victory New Testament Fellowship International. It’s an interdenominational organization whose only purpose, apparently, is ordaining people who can’t get ordained by their home denominations. “MINISTERIAL CREDENTIALS FOR MEN AND WOMEN CALLED BY GOD”, as they put it.

Victory New Testament Fellowship International is a group of evangelical Christian ministries and churches with an emphasis upon the work and ministry of the Holy Spirit in the Church today.

It was originally organized in 1953 and has offices located in the Dallas/Ft Worth Metroplex area. VNTFI ministers come from many different denominational backgrounds, but all endorse the VNTFI.s Statement of Faith. Members of the VNTFI have a wide variety of theological and Biblical training; many are seminary graduates. Others are Bible college graduates, and some have received training through theological education by extension or mentoring at the local church level. We do not believe that God limits His call to those who have had the opportunity to attend seminary.

Seminary isn’t the example Christ set but neither is this. Direct apprenticeship and mentoring was Christ’s example, not any certification organization.

Our goal is to love, serve, encourage, and help enable those who serve in front line Christian Ministries. We believe in recognizing the gifts and calling of God in lives of all who serve Him. Therefore, we ordain women as well as men. It is our desire to bring God’s Word to the nations.

Oh, you worthless, hypocritical scam artists. God’s Word says women don’t lead men. You’ll bring God’s Word to the nations without obeying it yourselves.

At the end of this chain of nonchurches ordaining women, pastors ordaining their wives and female apostles ordaining their Toxoplasma Gondii-carrying disciples is the apparent future of Christendom: Alice Marie Johnson, ghetto rat, ruined gambler, failed mother, rebel against her husband, convicted cocaine trafficker, convicted money launderer, Kardashian cause celebre and President Trump’s guest.

A reasonable portrait of the State of America’s Union.

I had such hopes. The government shutdown was working! Useless Federal employees were begging food in the Burger King parking lot! Then Trump caved in and instantly death spiraled to bestowing Presidential favors upon skank celebrities.

Why has nobody looked up Alice Johnson’s ex-husband for his opinion? The guy doesn’t even have a name, so far as the media have said to date.


Star Trek: Mansplaining

These are the voyages of the starship Manhood. Its continuing mission: to find extra space on mass transit seating. To enforce Privilege upon new life and new civilizations. To boldly tell Mary Sue what she already knows!

It’s the Final Frontier, to be sure. Ironically, Star Trek V bogged down on “Why does God need a starship?” whereas the new ST:D series simply gave her one and loosed her upon a hapless galaxy.

Viewer discretion advised: Star Trek: Discovery’s acronym is appropriate.

.Star Trek: Discovery. Murdered a Guy Mid-Mansplaining in the Season 2 Premiere

By Meghan O’Keefe, 18 January 2019

Star Trek: Discovery’s Season 2 Premiere had a lot of balls. I’m not talking about the audacity of re-introducing the original captain of the starship Enterprise, Captain Christopher Pike (Anson Mount), but the fact that this show straight up murdered a guy mid-mansplaining. I knew Star Trek: Discovery was the most progressive Star Trek show to date, but was this a hilarious step too far? (Eh, maybe not.)

I was this close to giving a female an approving nod. Her article’s title was excellent but then she agreed with it.

In case you missed last night’s Season 2 premiere . and don’t mind being spoiled .

Of course we missed it. Who wants an ST:D episode?

here’s how it all went down. When Captain Pike beams aboard the Discovery with an engineer and a science officer, Michael Burnham (Sonequa Martin-Green) is shocked to discover Evan Connolly filling her brother Spock’s place as said science officer. We soon learn that Spock peaced out and took some time off for mysterious reasons, leaving Connolly to fill his spot.

From the get go, Connolly is a buzzkill. Sarcasm is one thing, but Connolly keeps going out of his way to neg Burnham. Part of the problem is that Pike compliments Burnham on finding a succinct simile to describe a weird phenomenon…

Evan the Science Officer: “Our computers keep resetting when we try to scan the astronomical phenomenon.”

Mary Sue: “Like a compass at the North Pole?”

Captain Pike: “You go, girl!”

That’s how I heard the scene described.

…but part of the problem is that Evan sucks. He does not have the Federation collaborative spirit. He doubts Burnham’s qualifications, to the point of even suggesting that she is lying about her success as a test pilot for the pods.

Previous Star Trek series used Jews Ferengis for this sort of thing. It’s all fun and games when a stand-in race is used so nobody takes it personally but here, they might as well have used an actual Trekkie instead of an actor.

Oh, yes, the pods. About halfway through the Star Trek Discovery Season 2 premiere, the Discovery follows a mysterious red signal to the other side of the galaxy. When they jump out of hyperspace, they are confronted with a dangerous debris field and an unresponsive medical ship called the Hiawatha. Worried that there could be Starfleet officers stuck on the medical ship, Pike leads an away team to scout the Hiawatha for survivors. To get there, he, Burnham, Connolly, and another Enterprise officer fly pods through the debris field.

That’s pods, not shuttlecraft, because the parent studio did not allow ST:D full access to the Star Trek canon. That is news to me, proof that ST:D should have been aborted at conception and an indicator that Star Trek’s vaunted Diversity & Inclusion has not been the sort of Diversity & Inclusion the Elites want to see. In hindsight, no wonder: Ben Sisko was a black man yet the DS9 writers NEVER brought up reparations or O’Brien’s White Privilege! What a missed opportunity for Convergence!

In fact, between Kirk and Picard, this white man thinks Sisko was the best captain. That’s how hard the DS9 creators didn’t try to hate me into oblivion.

It.s a dangerous journey that Connolly doesn’t seem to take seriously. At one point, Burnham tries to warn him that he’s in trouble, and Pike concurs. Connolly shrugs this off boasting that he’s made the proper calculations for getting through the debris. When Burnham warns him again, Connolly smugly begins to boast about how much smarter he is.when some of said debris smashes into his pod killing him.

An event neither tragic nor surprising. The character was over-the-top obnoxious, unpleasant and arrogant from his introduction. That means the audience had no interest in his survival and consequently, no interest in his flaming death. Leftoids cheer the subtle-as-a-Taco-Bell-fart insult towards mansplaining without realizing that there’s no art here, no storytelling. Not to mention that the average Trek fan perfectly fits the description of Evan the ‘Splainer.

Hey, let’s make a caricature of every Star Trek fanboy and show him getting mindlessly killed for being obsessed with technical details like science officers are supposed to be! That will make us popular and reprogram white male Trekkie brains to obey black wimminz!

I don’t know if that counts as mockery. They might actually believe it. They might actually want to see white men everywhere declaring, “Star Trek SUCKS!”.


HR 1: What Happens In California Doesn’t Stay In California

Fueled by control of the Congressional House and amygdala seared by three years of Trump Derangement Syndrome, the Democrats’ first move in post-midterm Congress is to revoke the voting rights of non-Democrats. House bill HR 1 will enact on a Federal level the vote fraud recently perfected in Oregon, New York and my home California.

Get Ready: California-Style Elections Are Coming to Your State

By Ellen Swensen, 25 January 2019

If you thought the 2018 elections in California were a mess, you were right. Dangerous new election laws and lax practices contributed to that mess, and now they want the rest of the nation to suffer the way Californians do.

First, the mess. Election Integrity Project, California (EIPCa), a group of concerned citizens in California, has been documenting problems in the state’s election system for years. We have done the hard, messy work on the ground to catalog the problems.

California election officials and legislators have turned our elections into a free-for-all, with few safeguards, all in the name of “voter access.”

Recent initiatives include “top two” primary elections, automatic voter registration, allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections, allowing mail ballots to arrive after Election Day, rejecting voter ID, removing restrictions on who can handle and return mail ballots (aka ballot .harvesting.), same-day registration and voting, allowing voters to “cure” their mail ballot signature mismatches via the honor system and, in 2020, providing all registrants with mail ballots.

Democrats are the ones who benefit from universal suffrage because human nature is selfish and egotistical. The bigger the mob, the easier it becomes to appeal to the lowest common denominator.

Similarly, voting by mail is popular with Dems because there’s no witnesses. When voting is done in person at centralized locations, that’s when IDs and residency can be easily verified. But ballots that show up at a post office, how can one know whether they were individually filled out by the person they were purportedly mailed to?

Also, note that motor vehicle records are not related to residency status. Nobody barred from voting is automatically restricted from driving on the roads.

The article goes into several case studies of how these changes result in vote fraud. Example:

…These voters had no ballots to surrender and were forced to vote provisionally on Election Day, resulting in an unprecedented surge of provisional ballots in many counties. Los Angeles County, for example, had to process about 400,000 provisional ballots compared to 100,000 in the last midterm. They attributed most of the 300,000 ballot increase to mail voters who had no mail ballot to surrender, illustrating the magnitude of the problem.

Which is how several counties had more than 100% voter turnout in the past election.

Let’s move on to HR 1 as described by Huffington Post.

States And Cities Have Already Shown Democrats. Election Reforms Will Work

By Paul Blumenthal and Sam Levine, 10 January 2019

A sweeping reform bill that House Democrats say will be their first priority after ending the partial government shutdown is filled with policies that would fundamentally alter the nation’s voting and campaign finance systems. These policies are not coming out of nowhere. Most of them have been implemented and tested in cities and states across the country.

.Within the last five or six years, you just got more and more of these solutions happening at the state and local level,. said Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.), the bill’s chief sponsor. .It’s not a unicorn. It’s not like we’re talking about something that exists in the atmosphere of Jupiter. This is happening in America..

…Democrats. H.R. 1, which they’re calling the For the People Act. The bill’s campaign finance provisions on public election financing, dark money disclosure and democracy vouchers have all been field tested. The same is true of automatic voter registration, felon re-enfranchisement and the use of independent, nonpartisan redistricting commissions.

Automatic Voter Registration

Since 2015, 15 states and the District of Columbia have adopted automatic voter registration, a popular reform among advocates who believe it can significantly expand the number of people on the voting rolls in the United States.

Oregon, considered the model for automatic voter registration, was the first state in the country to pass it in 2015. While it’s still relatively early to assess the impact, the early evidence is encouraging.

AVR has been around for barely two elections and its own supporters admit that it’s early to assess the impact. But we should make it national policy because:

…In a little over a year and a half, the policy added 375,000 people to the voter rolls. A 2017 analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found over 116,000 people had been added to the rolls who wouldn’t have otherwise registered.

Automatic voter registration also went into effect in California last year, where it added 727,924 new voters to the rolls since its launch in April and updated the addresses of 269,365 people. (There were around 5.5 million eligible but unregistered voters in the state as of October.)

They mean new votes, not new voters. There’s a difference.

Automatic Restoration Of Voting Rights For People With Felony Convictions

Forty-eight states don’t allow people with felony convictions to vote while they are incarcerated, but states have widely different policies on when and how ex-felons can get back their right to vote. …

The For the People Act aims to fix this problem by automatically restoring voting rights once someone is released from prison. Currently, 13 states and the District of Columbia do this, but having a federal statute would help make the process easier for everyone involved.

They don’t care about making the process easier. They care about making it mandatory.

Dark Money Disclosure

The Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision led to an explosion of undisclosed money spent by nonprofits, trade associations and corporate entities in elections. Congress attempted to fix the court’s collateral damage to transparency with the Disclose Act in 2010, but it fell one vote short of clearing a Republican filibuster in the Senate.

States have since stepped in to pass their own Disclose Acts or to issue regulations to stop dark money in state elections.

Democrats want to know where their enemies get their funding.

Democracy Vouchers

This one was new even to me, which illustrates how quickly the Democrats are moving on these fraud-facilitating initiatives.

A little-noticed provision in Democrats. big reform bill would create a pilot program for “democracy vouchers. . a proposal to provide every citizen with vouchers that can be used as small-dollar political donations. These vouchers would come in $25 increments, but could be used to give donations as low as $1.

The “democracy vouchers” idea was first proposed by constitutional law professor Bruce Ackerman decades ago, but had never been adopted until Seattle voters backed a 2015 initiative to implement the idea. The program has already enabled a large number of people who would otherwise be incapable of affording political donations, including homeless people, to participate in the political process by contributing to candidates.

What’s the only thing better that lots of money in politics? Lots of TAXPAYER money in politics to be spent by not-taxpayers! Why should Democrats have to do their own fundraising?

Early Voting And Same-Day Registration

The For the People Act would require states to allow people to register on the same day they vote and to allow voters to cast ballots for at least 15 consecutive days before Election Day. It would require poll sites to be open at least four hours each of those days and, to the greatest extent possible, that they be located near public transportation.

Twenty states and the District of Columbia have approved some form of same-day registration. It’s seen as a reform that can greatly drive up voter participation rates because people start paying more attention to an election the closer it gets. Federal law currently lets states cut off voter registration 30 days before an election. Activists also embrace early voting because it gives people more time to go to the polls at their convenience.

Yes, America has a serious national problem: millions of eligible voters refuse to vote except on Sunday afternoons. /sarcasm Seriously, the real purpose of this is allowing people to vote twice thanks to the impossibility of coordinating who voted when, where, on a national scale, accurately enough to prosecute fraud before it alters the outcome of an election.

The proof that this initiative is exclusively to facilitate vote fraud is that the abovementioned “motor voter” ruling would make same-day registration moot.

Independent Redistricting Commissions

H.R. 1 would require states to create independent commissions that would be responsible for drawing congressional districts. State lawmakers currently have the power to draw districts once a decade, and both parties have manipulated that process to their advantage. In 2011, Republicans saw an opportunity to take control of state legislatures, control the redistricting process and lock in an electoral advantage for the next decade. They executed that plan extremely precisely and well.

Six states . Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana and Washington . use independent redistricting commissions to draw lines for state or congressional districts.

Which means 44 states don’t like the idea and House Democrats want to override how they’re allowed to run their own state government. Meanwhile, Democrats love the idea of independent government anything because it’s an absolution of responsibility. They can put in place all the “checks and balances” they pretend want but the truth is, whatever result these independent commissions come up with can’t be overridden no matter how lopsided.

Small-Donor Public Financing

The For the People Act’s main campaign finance reform is the creation of a small-donor matching system to publicly finance congressional elections. It is based on the decades-old public financing program run for New York City elections.

Even more taxpayer money in the hands of registered parasites!

New York adopted a small-donor matching system to publicly finance its elections in 1988 in response to a series of corruption scandals throughout city government. At the time, the system provided a 1-to-1 match for donations of $1,000 or less. A candidate received $1 in public funds for every $1 of a contribution up to $1,000. But the system has changed to boost the power of small donors over the years.

Nothing the New York gov’t does… either state or NYC… is something your state should be doing. One exception for broken-window policing.

New York City’s system has enabled candidates . especially those from less affluent neighborhoods . to more consistently rely on small donors in their districts.

“Less affluent” = “not middle class”

Trump’s Presidency has been great for convincing the enemies of Christ and Country to stand up and be recognized, but unless they get punished for their massive crimes and conspiracies then the agitation of Trump Derangement Syndrome will only have served to hasten America’s death.

We are quickly running out of time to Build the Wall and Drain the Swamp.


MGTOW Life: Original Sin

A Churchian named Bnonn, covered here before, has produced a newsletter that contains the usual man-shaming screeds dialed up to 11. Feels good. The cucks will get more shrill yet as their meatshield headcounts approach zero and the cucks take their own turn suffering for their civilization-destroying practices.

In the process, Bnonn’s screed does an excellent job of demonstrating the link between MGTOW beliefs and Christianity. The most fascinating part of Red Pill & Manosphere teachings for me has been the independent rediscovery and confirmation of Original Sin. Indeed, I believe that MGTOW is at heart a specifically Christian attitude and belief.

Eve was created to be Adam’s assistant and companion. All was well. Then Chad the Snake came along and convinced Eve to rebel against God & Adam. Eve chose the snake over God and when Adam found out, he followed Eve into damnation even though he knew from personal experience that God was the smart choice.

Eve envied God His status as a deity and seized a shortcut to Godhood. Adam listened to his little head instead of his big head. The resulting curses? Women would be always tempted to envy men and need to be controlled, while men would have to earn their food.

So now, how did our modern society fail? The Communists of the ’50s and ’60s convinced women to rebel, aka free love and grrlpwr, and the Silent & Baby Boomer men/fathers prided themselves on indulging female liberation… to the destruction of their own sons, then their own country’s sovereignty, then their own ethnic group’s survival, and soon, humanity’s ability to live in safety from Satan’s Throne of a unified world government. To be sure, the problem was always lurking in the background… which Scripture predicted and history confirmed… but modern telecommunications have permitted the weaponization of humanity’s first flaw on a global scale.

Meanwhile, female envy and usurpation of “male privilege” is not only uncontrolled, it’s actively encouraged, and the winners of our current way of life demand that the losers do the work so the winners don’t have to. The curse is rejected.

On that note, let’s fisk Bnonn’s newsletter. I only indented the text to preserve his italicization. Hat tip to 7817 and princeasbel on Dalrock’s blog for the linkage.

Feminism is the assertion that men are evil and naturally want to harm women, followed by pleas to men to solve all of women’s problems. .Dalrock’s Law of Feminism

This saying is true, and worthy of full acceptance. But there are Christians fighting feminism who are inclined to an opposite error. It is in some ways a much more serious one, because it implicitly denies what even feminism implicitly affirms: that men are, by nature, in charge.

The is classic Churchianism: “you might be right but we must be careful to not be too right”.

It is therefore important to reprove Christians who are falling into this error, and exhort them to true biblical manhood.

We can state the error simply as the inverse of Dalrock’s Law: the belief that women are evil and naturally want to dominate men, followed by demands that women solve this problem by submitting to men.

In Dalrock’s Law, the error is in the first clause.that men in general want to harm women.while a certain truth is recognized in the second.that men are the ones with the power to achieve feminism’s goals.

Bnonn establishes that the problem today is Dalrock and offers an alternative to Dalrock’s Law. One wonders if he plans to waste a single breath condemning feral women and the men who encourage them.

“The belief that women are evil and naturally want to dominate men” is straight outta Genesis. I despise all self-identified Christians who uphold the Bible as God’s Word yet cannot agree with it past chapter 3. (If they think evolution is true then they didn’t get past chapter 1, verse 1: “In the beginning, God created…”)

Similarly, the “demand that women solve this problem by submitting to men” is God’s demand to women, not mens’ demand to women. It is exceedingly difficult to force submission on those who wish not to submit; God learned that Himself with the Israelites.

Bnonn’s Inverse Dalrock’s Law is redundant with basic Christian theology.

But in the Inverse Law, a certain truth is recognized in the first clause.”your desire shall be for your husband”.but a much more serious error is implied in the second.that women have the power to achieve the biblical ideal of patriarchy. The reason we don’t have patriarchy now, in other words, or the reason the church (not to speak of society) is imploding under feminism, is that women are not submitting. If they would only return to their proper place, patriarchy would be restored.

Patriarchy is not an agenda that needs deliberate enactment and enforcement by a government or other body of men. As I’ve said many times, the purpose of the Christian life is to become a certain kind of person, not achieve a certain kind of outcome. Any woman who restrains her envy of men and submits cheerfully to her father/husband is a patriarchal woman, approved by Father God Himself.

Women can do it on their own.

This relocates the locus of control from its biblical center in men exercising their innate father-rule on behalf of God, to an ironically feminist-sounding and entirely false center in women’s virtue. It is a functional denial that patriarchy is actually built into creation; that men are always the ones with the power, even when that power is being bent toward the aims of women.

Innate father-rule? Even those of us who aren’t fathers? Most of the men reading this are not in any position of authority. What does Bnonn expect us to do, walk into CEO Barbie’s office and inform her that her reign of terror is over and the patriarchy’s back in town?

This attitude is exactly why MGTOW is a thing. The demands being made of us are impossible. We are blamed for situations we didn’t create and ordered to fix them with authority we don’t have. The only winning move is not to play.

Correction. The only winning move is blaming these arrogant Churchians midwits for holding us down while the gynocracy mugs us in the devil’s name.

In this way, many of those fighting feminism fall into a mirror image of it. Just as genuine gender equality is most useful to feminism when it remains an ideal that is never realized.let alone lived out.the same becomes true for patriarchy under those fighting feminism. Claiming to believe in patriarchy, to paraphrase Paul, they nonetheless deny its power.

This self-contradiction is especially obvious if one suggests that men need to take responsibility for women submitting to them. How often will this be glossed as blaming men for women’s faults (which is indeed a common problem in the church among those afraid to criticize women). But holding men accountable to the role God gave them is not equivalent to winking at women’s sins. On the contrary, calling men to require women’s submission is exactly to hold women accountable to submit!

Here, the author refuses to grant legitimacy to the men who do the good work of pushing back against feminism, men such as Dalrock. “Do it my way or you’re as bad as they are! My way is to blame you for the problem until you magically make it go away!”

Consider a recent example of Christian confusion on this point. In The Love of the Game, Cane Caldo argues that the exhortation and reproof of men is both ubiquitous and ineffective in fighting feminism:

The truth is that American Christians have raised at least four generations of brassy whores and all we can do is talk about how to be the kind of men brassy whores prefer to marry. Throughout these generations Christian leaders and men have been exhorting one another to virtue and godliness with the same terrible results.

But the first sentence and the second sentence are clear and flat contradictions. Either four generations of Christian fathers (we use the term not just biologically) have been exhorting one another to virtue and godliness, or they have been raising brassy whores and talking about how to be the kind of men brassy whores prefer to marry. Virtuous, godly men don’t raise brassy whores, nor marry them; effeminate, gyneolatrous men do. And effeminate, gyneolatrous men are living in rebellion to God’s word and creation, and are not virtuous or godly at all.

Blame the victim, how original. Two words: Job’s wife.

What anti-feminist Christians give with one hand, they take away with the other. They rightly charge that men must reestablish their rule, but if we then reprove the men in rulership for effeminacy.bishops, pastors, elders.we are accused of blaming men for a problem caused by women.

He lies. We don’t advocate that “men reestablish their rule”. We advocate both men and women confronting the sex-specific evil inside their souls. We aren’t demanding some Heaven on Earth, we’re demanding you practice the very religion you preach at us like a magic spell.

It sounds good, rhetorically. You can see the irony of us pointing to men, rather than speaking to women, because it seems to match up to the narrative of how no one is willing to call women out, and instead take the safe route of lambasting men.

It’s not irony, Bnonn. It’s you following women in their hatred of honorable men, as your fedora-tipping forefathers did.

(We’d also add that really, calling out women online, behind a screen, anonymously, isn’t any braver or harder than anything else keyboard warriors do. Calling out women in real life is.)

A call for self-doxxing. It’s a sign you’re useless to God when you aren’t worried about the likes of Antifa paying you a house visit.

As we’ve noted, when you establish a position in reaction to an error, there is a serious risk of becoming the mirror image of the thing you hate. In this case, anti-feminists have simply inverted feminist hypoagency. Under feminism, women are never responsible for’s always men’s fault. “Weak men are screwing feminism up,” as Dalrock correctly quips. Under anti-feminism, the situation simply gets reversed, and men get the default hypoagency through the imputation of hyperagency to women. “Brassy women are screwing patriarchy up.”

Dalrock didn’t say that as a true statement. Again, this is a common way for Churchians to claim the moral high ground without ever having to risk their comfy pensions: “If you oppose them then you’re no different, because they oppose you! We must find the Middle Way!”

Hmm, doesn’t that demon hotel Jordan Peterson call for exactly that? I can’t be certain because the guy produces more word salad than a dictionary in a shredder.

But the fact is, the situation we face is not an either-or, zero-sum game.

Christ or Satan, Bnonn. There is no spiritual Switzerland.

It’s not that either rebellious women are the problem, or effeminate men are.and since rebellious women are the problem, it’s not effeminate men.

It’s both-and. Rebellious women are the problem and effeminate men are.

Having first misstated our position, Bnonn faults that position. He even tries to slip in “effeminate men”, which is not our complaint of men who encourage women in their envy and rebellion against men.

The two halves of Original Sin are feral women and the men who follow them into Hell, working together against the two halves of men who stand aloof and the women who follow those men into Heaven. Notice the one is a complete inversion of the other… of God’s natural order.

There are not two problems here. There are two sides of a spiritual war, Right and Wrong. It’s time to pick a uniform and burn a bridge, Bnonn.

Ironically, treating patriarchy as an unrealized ideal rather than a natural reality (whether from cynicism or naivety), is to adopt a masculine hypoagency which is the very pinnacle of effeminacy. It is to replace real masculine virtue with narrow, performative masculinity in anonymous sandboxes.playing make-believe at being men telling women no, rather than actually going out and telling women no.

Bnonn imputes authority to (other) men that they clearly don’t have so he can blame those men for not exercising said authority. That is what’s called “male privilege”, a nonentity that must exist because otherwise, men are innocent.

The fact is that toxic matriarchy requires male cooperation and enablement. Men just do have the power, and the only way for women to get it is for men to give it to Dalrock’s Law rightly observes. Patriarchy is built into the structure of creation.

Who fell from grace first, Adam or Eve? Eve. Adam didn’t “give her his power” to do that.

So if we now find ourselves in a situation where the church is falling to pieces from being overrun by power-hungry brassy whores, whose fault is it?

The church is not being overrun by power-hungry women. It’s being overrun by men who worship women instead of God, in God’s name. Men who then blame all other men in order to hide their own guilt. Men like Bnonn.

Well it’s certainly the fault of the power-hungry brassy whores for taking the power.

But who gave it to them?

It’s not rocket surgery. Weak men and brassy women are both screwing patriarchy up. Indeed, it’s so obvious as to be uninteresting. We’re not here to endlessly reiterate the problem. We want to fix it.

Who will do that?

Who should we appeal to?

Who should we reprove and rebuke and exhort and train in righteousness?

If we have to choose, should it be the men of God, or the women of God?

For fuck’s sake. Bnonn the AMOG is wondering who he should appoint to solve the problem of feminism so he doesn’t have to. Well, don’t look at us MGTOW. We didn’t create this problem. We aren’t sustaining the problem, either. How could we? We aren’t even in the room.

We don’t believe there’s even the slightest question about this decision. The answer is always the men.

The answer is always YOU OTHER men. Not me! I’m too righteous and virtuous to be the problem!

Caldo suggests that for “any leader who wishes to be taken seriously,” “no less than half of his engendered instructions should be directed at women to be quiet and have some respect.” But this flies in the face of the basic dynamic of power. A 50/50 split makes no sense because there’s a fundamental 80/20 here. Pareto’s Principle alone would tell us that if we’re trying to fix a structural problem within a hierarchy, we should start with the people who have the actual power to fix it (not the perceived power). And since God built patriarchy into creation, that means the men. Men are the ones who have the power.

Which is it? Do we have patriarchy or matriarchy? If patriarchy then the men can solve the problem of feral women… but the problem doesn’t exist. If matriarchy then the men who are getting torn up by feral women aren’t able to fix the situation because THAT’S WHY THEY WERE VULNERABLE IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Women are never in control of society. When they’ve given authority, they give it to evil men in turn, just as Eve did in Eden. She didn’t take control of Adam, she accepted the snake as her new master. For his part, Adam chose to follow Eve instead of God. All creation has been subject to the devil ever since.

How then, to fix the situation? Adam must refuse to follow Eve and her enablers into damnation. Adam must… go his own way. MGTOW is the solution, the bridge between the gynocracy burning itself out and the beginning of a new, healthy society. Or as God described MGTOW, “When the wicked rise to power, people go into hiding; but when the wicked perish, the righteous thrive.” Proverbs 28:28.

The problem we face is not caused by brassy women taking power. By definition, they don’t have the power to do that, or they wouldn’t need to take it! It’s caused by soft men raising up brassy women, who then demand power, which the soft men trip over themselves to give.

Soft men raise bad women? Or do women choose to go bad? It’s not like Daddy is the only influence upon her life. From peers & social media to the cash & prizes of frivorce, there’s a lot of temptation for a girl to go wrong. Bnonn does very ill to blame the man for the woman’s behavior.

Thus, to solve the problem, we must speak to the men. We can either treat the symptoms, or we can treat the disease; we haven’t the energy to do both. The symptoms are brassy women who demand power. The disease is fathers.pastors, leaders, husbands.who raise them up and capitulate to them.

So the question is simple: which will more effectively prevent and reverse the problem we’re facing?

Brassy women becoming submissive and no longer demanding power, while the men remain weak and still want to give it to them?

Yes. Women must learn to control their feral instincts, which they have despite being raised by either strong men or weak men.

Weak men becoming strong and no longer giving women power, while brassy women still demand it?

You want us weak men to become strong, Bnonn? Take your boot heel off our faces. Instead, blame our persecutors… as Cane Caldo taught.

Obviously (1) is preferable to nothing, and a combination (1) and (2) is ideal.but if we have to focus on achieving only one, it’s not even a contest. (2) is a dead ringer for stopping the problem in its tracks, while (1) will result in complete failure. This is because the backbone of the with all patriarchy; not submissive women. If men just say no, women can demand until they’re blue in the face, but they will get nothing, and patriarchy will remain intact. The same is not true if women are just submissive, because patriarchy can collapse all by itself without any woman doing anything. This is the risk of belaboring the is men who have the power, and so it’s men who ultimately decide whether they’re going to be patriarchs or not.

The Church is always a patriarchy because “God said so”; therefore, if any evil happens it’s because you weak male pew-warmers allowed it to happen! Sheesh. Matriarchy is not “female rulers”. It is “warlord rulers”. Powerful, evil men who maintain female support by crushing the male have-nots around them.

And that is why men go MGTOW. It’s not because we want to. It’s not because we want to see society die. It’s because our society has turned cannibal. If we go back to the plantation, we’ll be cut down by petty warlords needing to perform for female approval. If we don’t go back, those petty warlords will start cutting down each other in a twisted version of a Viking funeral.

Bnonn isn’t one of those warlords. He’s one of the Adams who is horrified by Eve’s choice but enables her because the alternative is following God… and never getting to be a god himself.

By contrast, MGTOW refuse to follow women into evil and self-destruction. What Adam should have done. He should have turned his back on Eve and started over with the next female God made for him.

All Adam in Eden had to do was nothing. Sit poolside. We’re sitting poolside, too, watching our leaders turn on each other because they cannot feed off us anymore. It’s not the victory we want but it’s a victory we can get. And the floor show promises to be spectacular!

Patriarchy is built into you. You cannot hide from it, and you cannot exercise it by simply sharing incisive online analyses of what is wrong with the world.

You have to actually take command of that world, starting with yourself, and those under your fatherhood.your wife and your children.

Again, Bnonn imputes Male Privilege to us so he can demand we solve problems we didn’t create, don’t maintain, don’t profit from and can’t solve. But Male Privilege does not exist. It’s merely the only way he can keep blaming us who have never even had a seat at the table.

Toxic matriarchy requires men’s cooperation. In the majority of cases (the minority being much more serious), the only price for not cooperating is social awkwardness brought on by Gillette shavers realizing they have no power over you. What kind of man is afraid of awkwardness?

Weak men of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains and your meaningless little lives! Oops.

True, it sometimes won’t go your way.that minority of cases is a real killer. Your many small victories may be dwarfed by your colossal defeats on the most important and life-changing issues. There is an army of white knights who will fight you on behalf of women, and many of them have real power.pastors, employers, police, judges, bureaucrats. It sucks, and we have every sympathy for you if you are defeated; but war is hell, and this is war.

ARE YOU SERIOUS? “It sucks and we’re sympathetic but hey, this is war and your destruction is a risk we’re willing to take”? I meant my “weak men of the world unite” comment as a snark but… that’s how you TRULY think of us?

I don’t need to advocate for MGTOW. It’s enough quote the opponents of MGTOW.

We’re not promised personal victory; we’re promised cosmic victory (2 Tim 2:12; Rom 8:17; Rev 20:4). The kingdom of the world will eventually become the kingdom of our Lord (Rev 11:15).but it happens by taking up the sword of the spirit and the word of truth and discipling the nations to obey Jesus’ commands.

The only way to do that is individually, day by day. You must do it. We must do it.

Holy shit, he IS serious!

In victory or defeat, you are in command of your own life. It is your responsibility to teach your daughters to live quietly and reverently. It is your responsibility to call your wife to submission. It is your responsibility to tell her no when she is rebellious. And if you have a wife who will call other men to fight and defeat you when you tell her no, that’s because of a bad choice you made.




Very likely you made it in ignorance, and your situation is unjust.but you are still called to face it, and if necessary to suffer through it.

In the same way, if you’re a pastor whose congregation will not hear you telling women no, if they will find a way to remove you from leadership, you are called to stand firm. You will suffer, and you may lose your job, but is it better to be a weak man, scratching their itchy ears to save your paycheck? Of course not. Have you been beaten and scourged and stoned for standing firm before rebellious women and their white knights? Have you defended the Lord’s table with your very body, demanding that brassy whores take your life rather than take the sacrament to defile it? The apostles, the Reformers, our other spiritual fathers endured in such a way. You’re afraid to lose your livelihood; they were unafraid to lose their lives. You cannot fear God and fear man. You cannot serve two masters.

Sounds nice but he opposed Cane Caldo for preaching exactly this. Which is it?

Yes, we’re telling anti-feminist Christians to step up or shut up.

Are we trying to alienate men by saying this?

No. We are trying to separate the wheat from the chaff. 2 Timothy 4:2.4 says:

…preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

The irony of Bnonn quoting this passage while telling the itchy ears of rebellious women that their evil is mens’ fault.

As we’ve said, fighting feminism risks coming the mirror image of feminism. So what must be our response? It must be to call men to genuine, biblical manhood by preaching the word.

The Bible is not a spellbook. There is nothing magical about preaching it at other people. The purpose of preaching it, especially back when illiteracy was common and books were not, is so the people (NOT the preacher) could apply the Bible to themselves.

I just blew the fuse of every Churchian who thinks leadership is preaching the Bible at people for forty years and then retiring in comfort. They don’t even check if anybody is still listening.

Step up because God commands it of you. It’s what he made men for.

Step up because defeating feminism will not happen by sitting on your loins. God requires you to gird up those loins for action. He requires you to stop being intimidated by the perceived power of women. He requires you to stop being fearful and negative, and to stand firm, and to suffer for him if necessary.looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who did the same thing for the joy of bringing victory out of defeat.

God requires you to do as I say so I don’t have to do it myself! Hardly the example Christ set. Feminism will defeat itself, just like fire and for the same reason: it can only exist by consuming more, more, ever more. By saving ourselves, we MGTOW pass through the fire able to rebuild the world. You’re welcome, world.

And for those who will not, for the grumblers and the malcontents following their own sinful desires, for the loud-mouthed boasters showing favoritism to gain advantage.our words will encourage them to expose themselves, so we can relegate them to the gloom of utter darkness as quickly as possible.

The sinful desire of not ending up a smear on the tank treads of Feminism because AMOGs like Bnonn can’t survive without our sacrifice. Heh, he even threatens us with going to Hell if we don’t do as he says. Bnonn doesn’t hold those keys and we already left the room. Just like he wanted?

Either exercise the power God gave you and stop giving it to brassy whores, or stop whining about brassy whores taking power. It’s your choice. Not theirs.

God gave us no power. Thanks for checking. You gave us no power either, Bnonn, so we MGTOWs make the one choice we can: live free or die.

Christ has called us to freedom. He died so we wouldn’t have to. Bnonn, stop preaching the Bible at others and preach it at yourself instead. You are the one who needs to hear it.


Ted Bundy’s White Privilege

How was infamous serial killer Ted Bundy able to rape & murder three dozen women in the ’70s? White privilege! And by white privilege, we mean Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The main article is just some colored victicrat’s tragicomic hysteria that got picked up by Yahoo! News. But it’s entertaining enough and an excuse to recap Ted Bundy, whose history is surprisingly relevant to Christian Manosphere interests. As a bonus, I will also discuss his tricking Dr. James Dobson on the evils of pornography.

Ted Bundy Wasn’t Special Or Smart. He Was Just White.

By Ashley Alese Edwards of Refinery29, 28 January 2019

Refinery29 'Money Diaries' Post Leads to Fight About Who ...

Ashley is a Negress whore, since we’re being so “anti-racist” as to blame white privilege for serial murder. Notice the wine glass at the bottom of the pic, indicating that Social Justice is perhaps bringing Ashley less fulfillment than the family she’ll never have.

Ted Bundy, though dead for 30 years, is again having his moment in the spotlight. In 2019, the serial killer . who brutally raped and murdered at least 36 women . is the subject of a new four-part docuseries on Netflix, Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes, and will be portrayed by a chiseled Zac Efron in the film Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile, which will be released in theaters on January 26.

Who is the target audience for this documentary on an infamous criminal? I learned from vampire subculture that what women find interesting about violent crime is not remotely what men find interesting about violent crime.

In both the docuseries and the film, Bundy is painted as an artful, handsome, and exceptionally intelligent man; one whom you would never, ever think was capable of bludgeoning women to death and then having sex with their corpses. In the movie’s trailer, Efron’s Bundy smirks, winks, seductively takes off his shirt, and passionately rips off a woman’s blouse.

Female target audience. They repackaged a necrophiliac Dark Triad into a bodice ripper. See, a man would have been interested in the thrill of the manhunt, in the building of suspense as Evil Personified does his evil deeds even as they help Justice close in. But Ashley is unhappy with Bundy being sold as a sex symbol? Honestly, after Fifty Shades of Gray there’s no point in dissembling on this kind of kink.

Bundy.s image in 2019 is not much different than what it has been since he was first arrested in in 1975. News media at the time depicted Bundy as charming and charismatic. (Here’s Dan Rather calling Bundy “intelligent” and “articulate” the day before his execution in 1989.) In Conversations with a Killer, PBS correspondent Ed Hula says “the lurid nature of the case, the depravity of the violence, and the personality of Ted Bundy combined to make this something that the media could not ignore.” Marlin Lee Vortman, a friend of Bundy who met him when they both worked on the campaign for a Utah Republican gubernatorial candidate said Bundy was “the kind of guy you want your sister to marry.” This perception of Bundy as a bewitching Lothario, who was able to hide his evil double-life so well because he was almost supernatural, has been the inspiration for dozens of TV specials, documentaries, and movies; Buffalo Bill, the serial killer from Silence of the Lambs, was based loosely on Bundy’s supposed ability to outsmart law enforcement. Positive descriptors like .good-looking,. .clean-cut,. and, of course, .charming,. are used countless times in reference to Bundy throughout Conversations with a Killer.

Bundy being desirable fits the facts, Barbie. It’s hard to get away with crime when you look & act like a drug addict and hard to get female trust when you look & act like a creep.

But the Ted Bundy of America’s consciousness is a myth. Bundy was not special, he was not smarter than the average person; he did not have a personality so alluring that his female victims could not help but simply go off with him. He did not have a superhuman skill to be one step ahead of the police. What Bundy did have was the power of of being a white man in a society that reveres them and has implicit faith in their abilities. This privilege gave Bundy the ability to make even the most heinous of crimes take second place to his personality. Bundy isn’t even exceptional when compared to other American serial killers. So why is his legacy treated with fascination and twisted admiration rather than condemnation?

You asked, I’ll answer. Because Bundy was sexy.

A monochrome photograph of a expressionless man with piercing eyes

Ted Bundy

Gary Ridgway Mugshot 11302001.jpg

For comparison, Gary Ridgway aka Green River Killer, a contemporary of Bundy. He didn’t have groupies at his trial despite being the more accomplished murderer.

In “Handsome Devil,. the first episode of Conversations with a Killer, which is based on taped deathrow interviews of Bundy by journalists Stephen Michaud and Hugh Aynesworth, a rosy Bundy paints a rosy picture of his own childhood growing up in Tacoma, WA. .First grade I was a somewhat champion frog-catcher,. Bundy said. .I mean, I was a frog man.” By Bundy’s own words he was a normal kid. But, slipped between the macabre praise of Bundy’s personality is his childhood friend Sandi Holt’s take on who Ted really was: He didn’t fit in, he couldn’t do anything right, and at one point he was teased for a speech impediment. .In high school, he wanted to be something he wasn.t. He was gonna be president,. Holt said. .He was going to show the world that he was the one to be dealt with and it was a lot of blowhard talk. He tried to fool you and lie to you. He wasn’t athletic. He wanted to be number-one in class but he wasn.t.. He was listed as “illegitimate” on his birth certificate and there is reason to believe he was abused as a child. From the beginning, he was creating his own mythology.

This is an excellent example of the difference between hating someone and wanting to hate someone. Is it not enough that Bundy was an infamously evil murderer? Must he also be a lifelong misfit loser since childhood?

Per Wikipedia, “Bundy was born Theodore Robert Cowell on November 24, 1946, to Eleanor Louise Cowell (1924.2012; known as “Louise”) at the Elizabeth Lund Home for Unwed Mothers in Burlington, Vermont. His father’s identity was never determined with any degree of certainty. His birth certificate assigned paternity to a salesman and Air Force veteran named Lloyd Marshall, but Louise later claimed that she had been seduced by “a sailor” whose name may have been Jack Worthington.”

Sounds like a very close call for likely-cuck Lloyd Marshall. Bundy’s mother was a shameless, unwed harlot. Does Ashley have any condemnation for the misconduct of Bundy’s mother? *crickets*

The docuseries and coverage of Bundy in general selectively frames his credentials and his crimes. That Bundy went to law school is popular knowledge; that he got mediocre scores on his LSATs and eventually stopped going to class altogether is not. Casting heartthrob Zac Efron to play Bundy would make one believe he was a ladies’ man, when in reality he had few girlfriends and was dumped by his affluent and successful college sweetheart because he was directionless and insecure. While the docuseries makes note of these facts, they are overshadowed by non-stop dialogue about Bundy’s appearance and his alleged hypnotizing effect on those around him. While on trial in Utah for the kidnapping of Carol DaRonch (who escaped), Bundy wore nice suits, had his hair coiffed, and playfully bantered with reporters about finishing law school. The media ate it up, but the brave eyewitness testimony of DaRonch canceled out Bundy’s lies and he was convicted and sentenced to prison.

I wouldn’t expect a for-entertainment documentary to be the most accurate account of… anything. Is there any reason a defendant wouldn’t be allowed to make himself presentable at court? Ashley has some personal issues to be this unreasonably spiteful.

Even the journalists who somewhat enabled Bundy’s false narrative had to admit the truth: .The man’s a wimp. I mean, people that sneak up on women and kill them . what else can you say?. Hugh Aynesworth, one of the journalists who interviewed Bundy while he was on death row, said on the day of his execution in 1989.

Wimps don’t hunt and kill prey. Those are the actions of a predator, not a Whole Foods shopper. Enough with the disqualification!

But because Bundy, with the help of the media, was seen as just a young man who may have lost his way, he was allowed shocking levels of leeway that were unlikely to be afforded to men of color, particularly those who are Black. The same year Bundy was executed, Donald Trump took out full-page ads in four New York City newspapers calling for the execution of the Central Park Five, a group of Black and Latinx young men ranging in age from 14 to 16 years old, who were accused and convicted of raping a white woman in New York City. The teens, who were called “savages” and compared to animals in the press, were later exonerated by DNA evidence.

TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME! Every single time. Trump didn’t call for Bundy’s execution because Bundy was already dead. Execution was 24 January 1989 and the rape/near-murder of Trisha Meili was 19 April 1989.

Does Ashley hate all white men because Donald Trump is President? There’s probably some truth in that. Scary.

Judge Edward Cowart, who was presiding over the trial, toured Bundy’s cell and ordered he be moved to a different one after a petulant Bundy complained of not having enough light to read. The judge would often refer to Bundy, who was then 33 years old, as “young man” and .partner.” To watch footage of the trial is to see in action the infantilization of Bundy in front of America despite his monstrous acts, simply because he was white and conventionally attractive to the dominant culture at the time, while Black men and women accused of crimes are sexualized and made into violent caricatures as a default.

There’s her reason. Ashley hates white men so much that watching Ted Bundy be treated politely is a racial injustice. Because the blacks who invented “my race right or wrong” never give their own any slack!

This kind of race-baiting is stupid. I even despise my own doing it but instead of taking the high road, I need practice this stupid game that stupid blacks like Ashley want to play. Doesn’t matter what the game is, I just want to win.

.It.s a tragedy to see such a total waste, I think, of humanity that I have experienced in this court. You’re a bright young man. You.d have made a good lawyer,. Judge Cowart said as he sentenced Bundy to death by electric chair. .I.d have loved to have you practice in front of me, but you went another way, partner. Take care of yourself. I don’t have any animosity to you, I want you to know that..

I boldfaced Ted Bundy’s white male privilege.

And therein lies the crux of the Bundy myth: Even when convicted of the most depraved crimes, a white man’s supposed potential will supersede reality. From the time he was first arrested, to when he was strapped to the electric chair, to present day when he is being romanticized into some machiavellian Romeo , Ted Bundy was given the benefit of the doubt.

No, Race-Bait Ashley, the benefit of the doubt does not include being executed for murder. The judge sentenced Bundy to die, as was right and lawful, and Bundy was put to death. You’re projecting your “my race right or wrong” attitude onto the Bundy case, where it obviously does not fit.

We don’t need Ted Bundy to be reminded of the white male privilege so embedded in American society. We see it when white men are given lenient sentences for rape and manslaughter because they have promising futures or because they were raised with such affluence, people think they shouldn’t be held responsible for their actions.


We see [white male privilege] when dozens of people are shot dead in churches, schools, and newsrooms and lawmakers take no meaningful action because the perpetrator isn’t Brown or from the Middle East.

Many links omitted. When white shooters kill white victims, it’s white privilege because all white people weren’t disarmed in the aftermath.

How stupid do these #BlacksLoveMisery think we are? We know the disarmament they demand is only the prelude to the Zimbabwe treatment. Let me make a prediction: America ain’t gonna go quietly like South Africa.

We see it when women are targeted because they left an abusive relationship or turned down a man’s advances and it barely makes a blip in the 24/7 news cycle. We see it when Ted Bundy’s name is cemented in pop culture but his victims remain supporting acts in his story.

Victimhood mentality, anybody?

Ted Bundy should not only be left in the past, the story of who he really was needs to be accurately rewritten.

Social Justice Warrior confirmed. The future is certain, the past is subject to change!

Washington Post writer Joel Achenbach wrote in 1991, .The imaginary serial killer is a powerful creature, brilliant at his craft, an implacable death machine. He’s like a shark, driven not by mindless hunger but by an elaborate malevolence . evil, if you will..

That’s actually a good description of non-imaginary serial killers.

He continued: .Real life is not so gothic. When police bag a serial killer, he is usually a weak man, cowardly, not terribly savvy, and a failure at most everything he’s ever done in life. He’s a loser.” In 2019, it’s time to undo Bundy’s delusions of grandeur and remember him as he should be: as a gutless creep who could only feel power by preying on the vulnerable.

That’s provably wrong. Okay, whose bitch is this?

Joel Achenbach. Maybe pedo, definite male feminist. A brief detour:

Post reporter Joel Achenbach suspended for 90 days for “inappropriate workplace conduct.

By Paul Farhi, 10 January 2018

The Washington Post suspended reporter Joel Achenbach on Wednesday for what it called “inappropriate workplace conduct” involving current and former female colleagues.

Achenbach, a veteran reporter, is the first Post journalist to be disciplined for misconduct of this kind since a wave of sexual-harassment allegations began roiling through news outlets and other organizations in the wake of revelations about Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein in early October.

The Post said Achenbach would be suspended for 90 days without pay, the most severe newsroom punishment the paper has handed out in recent years for violations of its workplace or journalistic standards. His suspension began immediately.

The paper’s top news managers declined to describe Achenbach’s misconduct in detail and said the investigation into his behavior took two months.

Achenbach also would not elaborate in an interview on Wednesday. He instead referred to a statement: “I’m very sorry to say that I’ve behaved badly and have been suspended by The Post for three months for inappropriate workplace conduct. I’ve said and done things that were unprofessional, and I apologize to the women affected by this and acknowledge their courage in speaking out.”

If he’s right and serial killers are weak, cowardly losers, then WaPo better double down on that investigation. In the meantime, Ashley continues the proud female tradition of not being able to identify potentially abusive men. I bet every man reading this had a quick “uh-oh” reflex at his pic… Ashley quoted him as a credible source.

As for Bundy, his white privilege got him righteously executed in a courteous and lawful fashion. One could wish all violent criminals to be so privileged. “If thou art comfortable, milord, we shalt begin thine righteous punishment, that Almighty God might see fit to forgive thine soul its mortal transgressions.” *BZZZT*

Homeless men on the sidewalk? White privilege! False accusations destroying a scientist’s life? White privilege! Ted Bundy meeting Old Sparky? White freaking privilege! But we know what this is really about: white privilege got Trump elected! White privilege and Russia!


Ted Bundy gave a famous Death Row interview to Dr. James Dobson on the evils of pornography and how it led him to death-spiral into rape, murder and necrophilia. I was told about it repeatedly in my 80s childhood and lots of other church guys were, too.

But it didn’t turn out to be true.

Let’s be honest, every healthy male reading this who isn’t VERY lucky in love either has or had a significant porn habit. It’s the Internet Age, real women are trash and testosterone doesn’t have an off switch so go figure. And yet, the number of us who have turned into Bundy-style monsters is nil; in fact, the most violent among us tend to be the ones who insist on (unattainable) real women.

Ted Bundy lied to Dobson about the dangers of porn use and Dobson bought into it completely. The first rule of deceit is saying what the chump wants to hear. A quote from Wikipedia: “I wish I could believe that his motives were altruistic,” wrote [biographer Ann] Rule. “But all I can see in that Dobson tape is another Ted Bundy manipulation of our minds. The effect of the tape is to place, once again, the onus of his crimes, not on himself, but on us.”

You want to prevent Ted Bundys from happening? Then advocate intact, patriarchal families. Don’t blame porn, that was just Bundy getting a last laugh in God’s face.

By the way, guess how Theodore Robert Cowell got renamed Ted Bundy? Again to Wikipedia, “In 1950, Louise changed her surname from Cowell to Nelson, and at the urging of multiple family members, she left Philadelphia with her son to live with cousins Alan and Jane Scott in Tacoma, Washington. In 1951 Louise met Johnny Culpepper Bundy, a hospital cook, at an adult singles night at Tacoma’s First Methodist Church. They married later that year and Johnny Bundy formally adopted Ted. Johnny and Louise conceived four children of their own, and although Johnny tried to include his adoptive son in camping trips and other family activities, Ted remained distant. He later complained to his girlfriend that Johnny wasn’t his real father, “wasn’t very bright,” and “didn’t make much money.””

Do. Not. Play. Captain Save-A-Ho.