It only takes a single story of a feral woman cashing out a husband to inspire a thousand bored wives. Let’s see if the reverse is true, also!
Texas judge denies US citizen due process rights, sends her before Islamic Sharia tribunal instead
h ttps://www.theblaze.com/news/texas-judge-due-process-islamic-sharia-tribunal
By Phil Shiver, 7 July 2021
A judge in Texas earlier this year effectively denied a U.S. citizen her constitutionally protected due process rights, choosing instead to order her to appear before an Islamic tribunal where her testimony is considered inferior. And when her lawyers sounded the alarm . the judge doubled down.
Oh noes! Sharia law is making inroads even in Texas! How could this happen?
The woman, Mariam Ayad, was attempting to exercise her legal right to a divorce last year when her husband, Ayad Hashim Latif, revealed that on the day of their wedding in 2008, she had signed an Islamic prenuptial agreement to have all matters regarding the marriage and divorce be decided according to Sharia law.
Oh. That’s how. She’d agreed in writing to Sharia arbitration and the judge… that horrid, nasty judge… was forcing her to honor the agreement. Don’t judges know that it’s a woman’s prerogative to change her mind?
[Collin County District Judge Andrea Thompson] . in complete disregard of both federal and state law . ruled that the prenuptial agreement is binding, without taking testimony from the wife.
OUCH! A female judge ruled that a prenup is binding!
The strange case serves as an example of the incompatibility that exists between American law and Islamic Sharia law and the clash that can occur when the two systems are juxtaposed.
What’s especially unacceptable in this case, according to Mariam’s lawyers, is that a U.S. district judge would force an individual to undergo arbitration in accordance with a foreign legal system contrary to the laws of the country of which she is a citizen.
This article is as much author’s opinion as reporting, which I’m fine with. We’re all biased and I prefer that inevitable bias to be obvious. But Mr. Shiver is entirely wrong and it’s way past time for women who demand male privilege, to be held to male standards of conduct.
If you voluntarily agree to arbitration by a foreign power then it is proper that you not be allowed to use a more favorable system when the times comes.
Let me quote it again:
“The woman, Mariam Ayad, was attempting to exercise her legal right to a divorce last year…”
Wifey got bored, filed for divorce, expected to get that pesky prenup thrown out–always happens, right? Not this time!
Mizz Ayad is FUBAR.
In absence of relief, Mariam will now be required to settle her divorce matters with the Islamic Association of North Texas in front of the Muslim clerics who view her testimony and evidence as carrying half the weight as a man’s.
Oh Noes! A frivolous cunt wanting to unilaterally blow up her home, and reject the man she, herself, chose, is being delayed by her own prior vow.
A woman being held to her own prior agreement in America? … Better check to see if hell is frozen over. LOL Yet even still those silly defilers will want to continue pretending to be equal to a man! LOL Fickle Floozies!
(Standing before Judge Thompson, lifting up her dress, dropping her panties, spreading her legs, and furiously pointing at the stretched-out, clam-shaped object in her mid-section, screaming):
“DO YOU NOT SEE THIS, YOU STUPID, BLIND BITCH?! IT’S CALLED A CUNT!!! C-U-N-T, CUNT, , AND YOU HAVE ONE, TOO! HOW DARE YOU BETRAY THE TEAM AND NOT GIVE ME THE CUNT COUPON/PUSSY PASS TO WHICH YOU KNOW I’M ENTITLED!! I’LL KILL YOU, YOU TRAITOROUS BITCH!!!”
That weird feeling when you are found accountable for your actions…
I nominate this post for “feel-good story of the year”.
I’m sure she’ll claim that she only signed on to that Sharia thing under duress, i.e. hubby wouldn’t agree to marry without it. Back in 2015 when feminism was cool, girls were claiming sexual assult because if they stopped having sex with their boyfriends, they’d get dumped and have to find another place to live. Duress!
Still, I agree with the idea that women have, and want, limited agency. If she is unfairly treated during this legal process, it’s her father’s fault for either agreeing to it or being uninvolved.
“I.m sure she.ll claim that she only signed on to that Sharia thing under duress”
Her exact claim was that she thought she’d been signing a copy of the marriage certificate per the linked article. The judge has rejected that claim twice so far.
Nikolai – What do you mean by “…. women have, and want, limited agency”? They don’t want ANY agency, they just want the benefits of having agency and they want men to provide those to them. If I could have all the perks from something without any of the duty, responsibility or risk I’d take it any day. It’s unreasonable childish thinking to expect that, or even ask for that type of an arrangement with a straight face, but if someone’s willing to take the downside and give me the upside, who am I to stop them?
So it might be women who get the shaft in divorce court for a change?
Maybe Sharia ain’t so bad after all.
Speaking of divorce …
Just today Dennis Prager preached monogamy. He said that Man’s nature is not monogamous, but the Bible tells us to form monogamous relationships, which is why he, Dennis, embraces monogamy as one of his “values.”
No mention of his two prior divorces (which I believe he initiated, trading in each wife for a younger model).
Mr. Shiver — another collaborator sellout of masculinity — is outraged that the Almighty Woman in this case had to bear responsibility for her own actions.
REEEEEEEE! How DARE you subject me to consequences?!
Shiv-er. At least the cuck is well-named.
Just today Dennis Prager preached monogamy. He said that Man.s nature is not monogamous, but the Bible tells us to form monogamous relationships, which is why he, Dennis, embraces monogamy as one of his .values..
No mention of his two prior divorces (which I believe he initiated, trading in each wife for a younger model).
Silly boy, those rules are for GOYIM, not the sanctified puppeteers of the Goyim’s world and the corruptors of their Christian religion.
Is she preggers? One of the most obvious parts of Islamic divorce rules in the Koran, is a whaman has to stay living in her ex-hubby’s house for 3 months to prove she isn’t pregnant, because the children belong to him not her. At least the Koran says that; who knows if “sharia” changes it or how much.
Dude if you say that they.ll dox you and charge you higher interest rates