I Don’t Dream Of Nita Farahany

A pattern has developed, by which the Cabal normalizes loathsome behaviors in the population.

1. Generate outrage. Even if it’s already condemned behavior, manufacture outrage. The behavior must become condemned by emotions, not by reasons. Emotions are easily manipulated and fatigue inevitably sets in.
2. Create new agencies to police the behavior. Install Cabalists in those agencies.
3. Once the sheeple are emotionally exhausted, make the outrage selective. Separate it from the actual behavior.
4. Normalize the outrageous behavior as much as possible. To the extent the people insist it remain illegal, the Cabalists in the enforcement positions will cover for their peers.

This was how sodomy got normalized, then child molestation. Today, Duke University professor of bioethics Nita Farahany is making conservative news for a quote she made at the recent WEF meeting… but they completely missed the actual role she plays in the Cabal, of practicing those above steps in order to normalize microchips in the brain.

‘What you think, what you feel: It’s all just data’: WEF event hypes era of ‘brain transparency’ in which companies will monitor employees’ thoughts and emotions

h ttps://www.theblaze.com/news/wef-event-hypes-era-of-brain-transparency

By Joseph Mackinnon, 30 January 2023

Politicians and technocrats from around the world convened earlier this month at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, to discuss how best to orient humanity’s future on its behalf. Among the speakers who had their ear was a so-called futurist and ethicist who hyped the adoption of neurotechnology that would afford employers, governments, and others to decode “brain activity in ways we never before thought possible.”

“What you think, what you feel: It’s all just data,” said Nita Farahany, professor of law and philosophy at Duke Law School and faculty chair of the Duke MA in bioethics and science policy. “And large patterns can be decoded using artificial intelligence.”

The quote fascinates me more than it disturbs me. It’s the foundational lie of globalism specifically and atheism generally, that there is no God, no spiritual world, nothing but what we can see and manipulate.

Relatively few of the Davos attendees are actual Ringwraiths: people who know the spiritual is real, that Christ is their only possible salvation, and proceed to knowingly, carefully and consciously embrace Hell in return for just a few seconds’ opportunity to hurt God the only way He can be hurt, by poisoning souls who would otherwise have accepted & appreciated God. No, most of them simply assume that this life is all there is and proceed to make the most of it. If “the most of it” means killing your neighbor and taking his stuff, then you win. Right? It’s not like you’ll ever be visited by the Cosmic Morality Police. And the meltfaced, vaguely unsettling person sitting in the next seat couldn’t have meant what he said, that he wants the New World Order to hurt people instead of material profit! That would be as non-materialistic as a Jesus freak!

Thus, I see Farahany’s WEF speech as preventative propaganda for the attendees. “Focus on the good stuff about what we’re doing to the Little People! They’ll be much happier once we can force them to be happy!.. or miserable.”

Farahany explained in her Jan. 19 presentation, entitled “Ready for Brain Transparency?” that when people think or emote, “neurons are firing in your brain, emitting tiny little electrical discharges. As a particular thought takes form, hundreds of thousands of neurons fire in characteristic patterns that can be decoded with EEG- or electroencephalography- and AI-powered devices.”

…Farahany focused on what she perceived to be the positive outcomes of monitoring and socially engineering the species, emphasizing that the adoption of these technologies could help address “some of the root causes of human suffering, from neurological disease and degeneration to mental illness, but of also unlocking a lot of the secrets of the human brain.”

“You shall be as gods! I promise you! Also, there is no God.”

Farahany also championed the use of attention-tracking ear pods, noting that employers are now able to determine whether an employee’s distractions are central, peripheral, or unrelated to their assigned task. She did, however, couch her support with the caveat that it should be optional on the part of employees, used to determine benefits as opposed to penalties.

Well, sure. The WEF is developing brain-invasive surveillance technology only with the noble intention of letting it be optional on the part of the surveilled. That’s why they discussed it as far away from those dirty little peasants as their private armies can arrange, short of Antarctica.

With the purported aim of preventing distracted-driving accidents on the road, Farahany suggested that truck drivers could be equipped with hats containing embedded electrode censors that would score what stage of alertness they are at in any given moment.

Extra to past interest in employee surveillance tools and the present availability of brain-monitoring tools, Farahany noted that 5,000 companies area already tracking their employees’ “fatigue levels.”

She talked too much! I’ll explain soon.

Anyway, this WEF talk is interesting because Farahany has previously positioned herself as a defender AGAINST these surveillance technologies.

When technology can read minds, how will we protect our privacy?

h ttps://www.ted.com/talks/nita_farahany_when_technology_can_read_minds_how_will_we_protect_our_privacy/transcript

November 2018

Tech that can decode your brain activity and reveal what you’re thinking and feeling is on the horizon, says legal scholar and ethicist Nita Farahany. What will it mean for our already violated sense of privacy? In a cautionary talk, Farahany warns of a society where people are arrested for merely thinking about committing a crime (like in “Minority Report”) and private interests sell our brain data — and makes the case for a right to cognitive liberty that protects our freedom of thought and self-determination.

The bioethical expert who cautioned us against mind-invasive surveillance, went on to give a presentation at Davos on how beneficial it’ll be for us. She’s one of the Cabalists parachuted into one of those “very concerned ethics oversight committees”.

Let’s hear her talk about how to defend our brains from tyrants, now that we’ve heard her talk about how invading our brains is a great idea TO those tyrants.

In the months following the 2009 presidential election in Iran, protests erupted across the country. The Iranian government violently suppressed what came to be known as the Iranian Green Movement, even blocking mobile signals to cut off communication between the protesters. My parents, who emigrated to the United States in the late 1960s, spend substantial time there, where all of my large, extended family live.

Were they changing the regime after a period of political exile?

When I would call my family in Tehran during some of the most violent crackdowns of the protest, none of them dared discuss with me what was happening. They or I knew to quickly steer the conversation to other topics. All of us understood what the consequences could be of a perceived dissident action. But I still wish I could have known what they were thinking or what they were feeling. What if I could have? Or more frighteningly, what if the Iranian government could have? Would they have arrested them based on what their brains revealed? That day may be closer than you think.

If her account was true then my question has a positive answer. While Farahany being appointed a bioethics expert by President Obama lends credibility to that, now that we’ve seen her be a presenter at Davos, we know she’s simply lying about her opposition to mental trespass.

As a bioethicist, a lawyer, a philosopher and an Iranian-American, I’m deeply concerned about what this means for our freedoms and what kinds of protections we need. I believe we need a right to cognitive liberty, as a human right that needs to be protected. If not, our freedom of thought, access and control over our own brains and our mental privacy will be threatened.

As a bureaucrat, a bureaucrat, a useless academic and an imported tool, Farahany thinks the best response to thought control technology is to trust the government.

As a Christian, Heritage American and unjabbed free thinker who actually belongs in the USA, I think the best response is to hang everybody advocating, using or attempting to create such technology. It remains true, that the recidivism rate for capital punishment is zero. Bonus chilling effect!

Consider this: the average person thinks thousands of thoughts each day. As a thought takes form, like a math calculation or a number, a word, neurons are interacting in the brain, creating a miniscule electrical discharge. When you have a dominant mental state, like relaxation, hundreds and thousands of neurons are firing in the brain, creating concurrent electrical discharges in characteristic patterns that can be measured with electroencephalography, or EEG. In fact, that’s what you’re seeing right now. You’re seeing my brain activity that was recorded in real time with a simple device that was worn on my head. What you’re seeing is my brain activity when I was relaxed and curious. To share this information with you, I wore one of the early consumer-based EEG devices like this one, which recorded the electrical activity in my brain in real time. It’s not unlike the fitness trackers that some of you may be wearing to measure your heart rate or the steps that you’ve taken, or even your sleep activity. It’s hardly the most sophisticated neuroimaging technique on the market. But it’s already the most portable and the most likely to impact our everyday lives.

It seems she has a fetish for these strap-on brain scanners. Or, perhaps she lacks the intelligence to regularly produce original material, which is an even lower academic standard than my blog. What a typical attitude for a technocratic globalist. They’re desperate to create humanlike AI so they can replace all humanity with robots, but all they ever manage to do is collect a lot of data then run a pattern-matcher on it.

It’s not creative. It’s not ingenious. It’s the frustrated, brute-force attempt to create in a bottle, what God created in a soul. And it’s a dead-end technology. Those search algorithms will get faster but they’ll never wake up.

A US-based company has developed a technology to embed these sensors into the headrest of automobilies so they can track driver concentration, distraction and cognitive load while driving. Nissan, insurance companies and AAA have all taken note. You could even watch this choose-your-own-adventure movie “The Moment,” which, with an EEG headset, changes the movie based on your brain-based reactions, giving you a different ending every time your attention wanes.

She talked too much again! Also, the boldfaced in the previous paragraph. See my closing thought.

Despite some inherent limitations in EEG, I think it’s safe to say that with our advances in technology, more and more of what’s happening in the human brain can and will be decoded over time.

She will lose that bet. Putting aside the fact that we ARE souls who HAVE a body, the brain is not merely electrical current running through transistors, err, synapses. There are chemical and protein elements to neuron activation, to say nothing of the fact that the brain can rewire itself. No magnetometer, however refined, is going to measure chemical reactions.

Proof: Prozac. Those serotonin reuptake inhibitors are not electrical signals.

But I worry. I worry that we will voluntarily or involuntarily give up our last bastion of freedom, our mental privacy. That we will trade our brain activity for rebates or discounts on insurance, or free access to social-media accounts … or even to keep our jobs.

Then she was featured at Davos saying that would be a good thing. Why did everybody else who mentioned her Davos talk miss this? The research effort I expended was a single Internet search.

It is not good to be an outrage machine. Producing mere outrage over evil is Step One in normalizing it. The easiest way to avoid that fate is to include some mocking and disrespect. What would Jesus do? Mockery is what Jesus would do, because it’s what Jesus did. I love my Savior!

…I don’t think people understand that that could change everything. Everything from our definitions of data privacy to our laws, to our ideas about freedom. In fact, in my lab at Duke University, we recently conducted a nationwide study in the United States to see if people appreciated the sensitivity of their brain information. We asked people to rate their perceived sensitivity of 33 different kinds of information, from their social security numbers to the content of their phone conversations, their relationship history, their emotions, their anxiety, the mental images in their mind and the thoughts in their mind. Shockingly, people rated their social security number as far more sensitive than any other kind of information, including their brain data. I think this is because people don’t yet understand or believe the implications of this new brain-decoding technology.

Lookit that. She’s manufacturing outrage over something that is already, reasonably and rationally, an unjustifiable evil. The first step is making people oppose it because they’re angry about it instead of principled against it.

Before you panic, I believe that there are solutions to these concerns, but we have to start by focusing on the right things. When it comes to privacy protections in general, I think we’re fighting a losing battle by trying to restrict the flow of information. Instead, we should be focusing on securing rights and remedies against the misuse of our information.

Lookit that. That’s a perfect example of why Cabalists are to be installed at the tops of the new regulatory agencies. “It’s too late to stop us. Make us swear a meaningless promise instead. Oops, I mean them, not us. Anyway, what we need are reasonable compromises because we can’t go back. What if we allowed mind control only if the subject says he likes being mind controlled?”

Studying aggregated information can tell us so much about our health and our well-being, but to be able to safely share our information, we need special protections for mental privacy.

I already have access to what my bowels are thinking, Obama toady WEF bitch. They don’t like you. It takes a colon to know one!

In thanks for reading this post, I will tell you a secret, why the Cabal wants to put microchips in your brain. It’s not to control your behavior or read your thoughts.

They want to induce sleep deprivation.

Notice above, how she talked about truckers staying awake & aware in both the TED talk and WEF talk? How monitoring stages of alertness was an idea she kept mentioning?

Everything about the Great Reset is to recreate the reeducation camp in our daily life. The starvation, the poverty, the humiliations, the lack of privacy, the restrictions on movement & association, the constant surveillance. They want our entire life to be a P.O.W. indoctrination camp experience. But there is one bastion that the Totalists have not yet broken: you are able to get a good night’s sleep.

They don’t want to manipulate your brain waves in order to read your mind. They want to manipulate your brain waves so you’ll always be too tired to resist. Oh sure, they’ll happily mind-read if they ever figure out how… they won’t… but their practical and achievable goal, as usual, is simply to induce more human suffering until you don’t just do as you’re told… you believe as you’re told.

That is what the Ringwraiths want.

Deny them by living well… and sleeping well.