I will keep saying it. Original Sin is the source of the West’s downfall. Our society’s decline will end only when woman’s rebellion against man ends. Would you see the end of child molestation? of sodomy as a civil right? of being ruled by thieving foreigners? of witchcraft and diabolism?
Then in the Name Of God, chain your woman to your home.
No more education. No more female leadership. No more “strong & independent”. No more police heeding female accusations. No more mixed-gender workplaces. And death to the adulteress.
Bonus Princess Bride action!
Matt Walsh misses the mark on gender … again
h ttps://www.christianpost.com/voices/matt-walsh-misses-the-mark-on-gender-again.html
By Kaeley Harms, 12 July 2023
Kaeley Harms, co-founder of Hands Across the Aisle Women’s Coalition, is a Christian feminist who rarely fits into boxes. She is a truth teller, envelope pusher, Jesus follower, abuse survivor, writer, wife, mom, and lover of words aptly spoken.
Being female, she IS the box. Also, she is an unrepentant, proud witch who should never have been allowed a voice on Christian media. Maybe don’t claim to be an “abuse survivor” until after your first century in Hell, Mizz Harms. You don’t know what abuse is. Abuse is what you feminists do to men.
Abuse is what you feminists did to my friends.
In the 1987 cult classic “The Princess Bride,” a beautiful young woman named Buttercup is forced into a non-consensual betrothal to a narcissistic buffoon of a prince named Humperdinck. Humperdinck is a big-game hunter obsessed with conquest. To him, Buttercup is just another trophy for the collection. He came, he saw, he wanted, he conquered.
Don’t lie about a classic, Kaeley, a movie that people actually watch. Buttercup accepted the betrothal because she thought her first love was dead, and being female, she needed a man to serve. She was smart, not forced.
In anticipation of the wedding, Buttercup moves into the palace. She’s given all the creature comforts a gal could want: extravagant clothes, the finest of foods, her own horse, but her life is not her own. She does not love Humperdinck. She’s trapped in a life of someone else’s choosing. Where others see a palace, she sees a cage.
Where I see a life of comfort and status, Kaeley sees oppression. One reason male viewers like Princess Buttercup is that the movie set up the usual love triangle… Alpha Chad, Bucky Beta… and Buttercup chose love over wealth. Actually love over Archduke Ferdinand, but still, men like devotion in a bride.
Kaeley is projecting her hatred of men into this movie. Women, your lives are not your own. You were created to serve a man. You may have a voice in which particular man you serve, but serve you shall. Get used to being barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen! It’s the life you would choose regardless, Mizz “I’m a feminist AND a mom!”, so don’t call yourself a victim just because your boobs work and mine don’t.
We men were created to serve God. Our lives are not our own, either, so don’t bitch about it. Christ prefers an orderly Creation.
So when Buttercup is kidnapped as part of a political strategy, it’s really kind of a crapshoot to determine which is worse: the danger of the unknown future with her captors, or the drudgery of returning to life at the palace.
To be, or not to be… a queen in safety or a rape victim sold into slavery? Choose freedom, choose capitalism, choose the slave markets of Tortuga! Oops, wrong movie.
Prince Humperdinck sets out with a posse of his finest hunters to go and “rescue” the soon-to-be princess. But the question remains: Does returning a person to captivity really count as rescuing her?
Did Kaeley actually watch this movie? Humperdinck was expecting to find her dead at the border of Gildur… because that was what he’d paid Vizzini to do.
Humperdinck didn’t even plan to collect her virginity.
In the last decade or so, the fate of womankind has been captured by an insidious cult known as the gender industry. Every hard-fought, sex-based protection women ever achieved…
Was handed her by weak men as a reward for nagging…
…is being systematically erased by this new men’s sexual rights movement that insists on flat-earth absurdities like the myth of being born in “the wrong body.…
She’s a TERF.
Enter conservative darling Matt Walsh onto the scene with his admittedly excellent documentary “What Is A Woman,” which shines a critically important spotlight on the issue, and suddenly the Republican masses are emboldened to step up to the plate and engage in the previously forbidden discourse that kept them sidelined and out of the fray. Walsh’s contribution is necessary. It’s helpful. It’s changed the tide and sounded the necessary alarms. I’m glad it exists. I would not take that from him.
But as I said almost exactly a year ago, I have some serious concerns about the world Matt Walsh is inviting us back into. He’s right that transgender ideology is a problem, but he is completely blind to the reality that it’s a problem that exists, in part, because of the regressive sex-role stereotypes he himself prescribes as the solution.
Are men and women different? Absolutely. Our bodies are different. Testosterone produces different results than estrogen does most of the time. Men are physically stronger. Women possess the superpower of gestating human life. But these are differences that work themselves out naturally.
Our minds are different, too. You can tell gender with a brain scan! You can also tell politics… if it’s blank, it’s Biden.
And God has much to say in Scripture about spiritual sex differences.
They don’t need to be bottled into some sort of script that we then, in turn, require the rest of humankind to recite at their own expense.
One thing I am desperate for more conservatives to understand is how much and how often we fuel the gender cult by bullying people into compliance with rigid gender norms.
That’s not just wrong, it’s 180 degrees from right. The gender-confusion cult begins with that rejection of “rigid gender norms”.
What is a woman, Kaeley?
She is a servant.
The servant must not rule over the master.
That is our fatal flaw, the reason humanity can’t have nice civilizations. The Original Sin that we are tempted towards, is a pantomime of the devil’s victory. Which is why it always invites Hell upon the Earth.
The extremes on the right say that only girls can like pink. The extremes on the left say that if you like pink, you must be a girl. The lies are connected. And Matt Walsh is actively, relentlessly peddling them. Take, for example, his Facebook post on Monday….
.Men shouldn’t cry.. .Emotions are for women.. .Men have a depth women can’t even begin to understand..
Oof. Just stop.
Remember King David? Like the most alpha guy of all time? The guy who killed a lion with his bare hands? Remember how he flooded his bed with tears? Or how about when Joseph was wailing so loudly from the other room that all the Egyptians could hear him? Remember the group cry sessions led by men of God repeatedly in the Old Testament? Remember when Jesus wept?
Wait, what? Group cry sessions?
Be like Jesus, Matt.
Be like Jezebel, Harms. Demand that men be emotional and weak like women, then despise men after you succeed. No. You women don’t tell men how to behave. You don’t teach manliness to men. You shut your mouth and cover your head.
But there’s more to manliness than being willing to storm the beaches at Normandy. In fact, during WW2, more than half a million service members suffered some sort of psychiatric collapse due to combat. And when they returned from war and bottled their emotions, their families suffered, as will all families raised under Walsh’s grotesquely immature prescriptions for masculinity.
Men haunted by the atrocities of war… women most affected!
I can’t even fault her for not understanding how men process trauma, because it’s not at all how women process trauma. I can totally fault her, however, for not even considering the idea that a supportive wife could be extremely helpful for a husband that came back changed by hardship. Don’t judge your hurting man… backrub him!
Between 2015-2020, fully 122,178 American men died by suicide, compared to the 19,297 women who took their own lives. Is this what Walsh means when he insists that women are more emotional than men?
Probably. A man wants to die, he does it. A woman wants to die, she gulps half a bottle of vitamins and alerts the media.
Walsh doubled down later in the day and went on to post about how God sanctions gender roles and began waxing on about the golden days of yesteryear when womenfolk stayed in our lanes.
![](https://gunnerq.androsphere.net/wp-content/uploads/imported/7sdkvb.jpg?resize=381%2C283&ssl=1)
He neglected, of course, to offer any kind of guidance as to where he thinks the parameters of those gender roles ought to fall. He just insisted they were useful, hinting at the idea that society might benefit from a return to “Leave It to Beaver” gender roles and hierarchies. Again, this isn’t a particularly biblically literate position. There was no gender hierarchy in Eden. That’s original design.
That’s blasphemy and an explicit lie, you WITCH!
But to hear Walsh talk, you would have thought God created the Stepford wives, put a vacuum in their hands, and called it “good.”
THAT IS WHAT GOD DID! Except it was Adam’s johnson that God put in her hands. “It’s not good for man to be alone,” hmm, what does a man and woman being together imply? Especially in the absence of clothing?
Gender roles existed because they were necessary to sustain life back in the day before the Industrial Revolution. Work was distributed according to ability, and the bulk of it occurred inside the home. Then big factories hit the scene and removed the work (including all the women’s work) from the home and outsourced it, leaving women to sit around twiddling their thumbs where they once had meaningful pursuits to occupy their time.
All lies. There’s nothing for me to say, she’s just spewing blank-slate, Marxist marketing copy at this point.
I.m perpetually told that I’m supposed to be grateful that guys like Walsh are rescuing us from the gender cult. And [to the extent of protecting female achievements from transsexuals], I am legitimately thankful for the work he’s done. But I’m not allowed to say that I resent being escorted back to the elaborate cage he wants to put me in, even if I’m absolutely certain that cage is hostile to human flourishing.
May it be so, Mizz Harms. May God cast you out of his elaborate, Heavenly cage where you would be welcomed and cared for, and placed in a seat of honor, and never allowed to reach your full potential as God’s equal. May God abandon you in the wilderness to fully self-actualize your human flourishing… among lawless predators employed in very prestigious lines of work, with a long and glorious tradition… of death.
Why don’t they walk offstage at these beauty pageants that select shemale crossdressers?
Notice that most of the Europastan rump vassals have wymyn secretaries of defense…and NATO (wink) can’t get past the first level of the 20 mile deep defensive line.
Love your insights, GQ.