…Is that incels are innocent.
Rollo Tomassi has a very thought-provoking post on Incels that I’ve been mulling over for a few days. The incel’s place in society is a difficult concept even for a incel like me (if I haven’t timed out of inceldom by age curing my libido) because there’s two types of incels being used in common parlance today. One type is imaginary.
The issue of potentially violent sexless men is not hard to understand. Our society is entirely gynocentric today; low-SMV men are forced to participate in the gynocracy while simultaneously being punished for not being part of the gynocracy. Cue all kinds of psychiatric issues like sex changes and persecution complexes. But violence, at least in the form of mass murder, is actually rare because it takes a serious level of nihilism to kill lots of strangers for no gain, enough that I doubt virgins on killing sprees is ever going to be a real problem.
Rollo theorizes that such a level of nihilism can be created by the inability to participate in the Blue Pill narrative. I believe that’s not true because lesser levels of violence (drugs, rape-rape, thrill-seeking) can acquire sex even for the most unsexy, not to mention legal alternatives such as porn. Some men are violent and some are sexless; the occasional intersection of the two groups is never going to be a systemic problem for society. While men want to support the gynocracy as a consequence of the Fall, the primary driving force in sexuality for men is sex not approval. Supporting my theory, Rollo himself identifies contributing factors such as fatherlessness & autism.
This is where I segue into the imaginary type of incel, at the fact that male participation in the gynocracy is motivated by the Fall of Eden.
The easiest way for a man to appear high-value to women is to destroy the other men around him. Literally in the case of warlords, metaphorically or rhetorically more commonly. Destroying is always easier than creating.
With the restraint of lifetime monogamy gone, men are in a state of constant competition for female approval. Incels make the easiest target so they’re attacked savagely. Reminiscent of the schoolyard, it’s the manginas at midlevel SMV that do the most bullying because they’re the most insecure about their status.
But their target of violently unstable incels doesn’t exist. It’s still incredibly rare for an incel to go on a killing spree or even force himself on a woman. The hatred is entirely unwarranted with no rationale offered. The manginas NEED incels to be a threat in order to justify the attacks & hatred they want to express regardless.
And there’s the devilish fix. An ever-shrinking pool of men must try ever harder to destroy the men around them ever more thoroughly until his own turn inevitably comes. Cthulhu will eat him last… or not.
Rollo suggests that the problem incels face is having the emotional agility to adopt the Red Pill when it is forced on them before they’re ready. But he doesn’t realize, incels aren’t a byproduct of feminism. They’re the strawman that fuels feminism. If one could push a button and make all incels vanish, feminism would immediately produce a new crop.
The problem our society faces is religious, not sociosexual. Unchecked feminism will leave no survivors, no winners of any kind, yet our society is hurtling into that void as eagerly as it can because supporting Eve’s rebellion is more important than even self-preservation.
That’s why unplugging men from the Matrix is so difficult in the first place. Men want to be led by women. Even successful men. The Goddess is our default religion.
I don’t wonder that the likes of PUAhate exist. Those who’ve been barred from any chance of success naturally hate those who have success, especially if the success appears to come easily–PUA gurus should maybe not sell themselves so aggressively. But it’s one thing to resent success and another to kill Bob because Mike gets laid like tile.
I close with a prediction: most incel rampages will be false flags because the gynocracy NEEDS to hate incels much more than incels need to lash out ineffectively at society.
A better question that no one asks is why? Why would a healthy man even consider a sexbot / AI. That is the question people should ask. The answer is The trailer for “Her” is spot on. I have always said it isn’t about sex, it is the companionship and love that men don’t get from women. I would buy that today.
In addition, the feminists may stop the robot, but cant stop a non sexual computer program. Yes once the AI or AI and robot come out women will be left alone (apparently just like they want).
As for women adopting them I doubt it. The AI, maybe. But why spend $10K on a robot that works as well as a $50 vibrator?
Larry Kummer, Editor
Sven, .A better question that no one asks is why?.
You must be kidding. That’s an often asked question, and probably has been for millennia. Why do men masturbate, use port, use prostitutes (i.e., quicky in an ally or car, 15 minutes in a brothel). I don’t know what the answer is. It doesn’t matter for the subject of this post. These drives exist. Modern feminism appears to be increasingly locking out a large segment of men (see yesterday’s post). Sexbots provide an alternative.
Strike #1: Men don’t get sexbots and related sex toys for companionship, Sven. They get sex toys for sex. But Sven is right that mainstream society should ask why sex simulators are preferred to real women.
Strike #2: Larry pretends to not know the answer to why men seek out sex alternatives and claims it doesn’t matter… in a post dedicated to men choosing to use robots as a sex alternative.
Men get married for easy, plentiful, cheap, no-STD sex with a dedicated chick. Full stop. That is his reward for putting up with female drama & expenses, not “respectability”, “companionship” or God help us, “profitability”.
Sex sells marriage. In fact, sex can sell anything; ask an advertiser. That’s how strong an urge it is. But Tradcons and feminists alike insist then men don’t really want sex. We want “family” or “comfort” or “approval”. In reality, the only men who get married hoping for a cold bed are the ones who’ve sublimated their normal desires into religious worship of muh’Lady. That’s unhealthy if you’re atheist and blasphemy if you’re devout.
Men never get married hoping that after a long day’s work, he’ll come home to a cold wife who respects him for being a good wallet. He knows the day will come when he can’t make fat bank… and meanwhile, he has a sex drive. What is he supposed to do about that?
If one wants happier marriages and higher birth rates then he should pressure wives to put out for their husbands and train daughters to expect & do that once they get married. For the love of Dick, why is this hard? And the Christian Tradcons have even less excuse; God’s own opinion is that the only good reason for marriage is “better that then burning with lust”. So make it a good outlet for lust already!