Dalrock put up an article about the interestingly batshit psycho Bridget Phetasy’s hatred of men.

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/07/18/a-tour-through-the-twisted-psyche-of-an-ugly-feminist/

Mel Magazine, which he linked to, had another article written by her not suitable for Dalrock’s mainstream audience. If Feminism 2.0 was women’s liberation from male authority and Feminism 3.0 is women’s open rebellion against men today, the link between the two is Evil using the opportunity to corrupt sexually mature women with permissive fathers/husbands. The evil of feminism has not just been its laws. It’s also been convincing men that women are naturally good and Not Like That. It should not have been such an easy sell.

https://melmagazine.com/my-month-as-a-member-of-the-wild-wild-country-sex-cult-8ac377aa7938

My Month As A Member of the “Wild Wild Country. Sex Cult

One of my best and most free-spirited friends recently texted me, .I totally would’ve been a Rajneeshee..

On my recommendation, she was watching the extraordinary new Duplass brothers documentary on Netflix, Wild Wild Country, which chronicles the too-crazy-to-be-true story of Indian mystic Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh (later known as .Osho.) when he comes to the U.S. in the early 1980s and purchases 65,000 acres on which to create an “intentional community” called Rajneeshpuram. What ensues when 2,000 hippies and a cult leader descend on a sleepy retirement community in the middle of nowhere Oregon is stranger than fiction: a story of sex, controversy, conspiracy and power.

.I.ve been,. I reply.

.Of course you were a sannyasin,. she texts back.

Until recently, I’d happily repressed all my memories about my three weeks as a .sannyasin….Sanskrit for .devotee….at an Osho ashram in Australia. But then my roommate started watching Wild Wild Country, and when I walked in the room, a bunch of people were jumping around on the screen naked, breathing heavily.

.Hey, I’ve done that!. I exclaimed.

Well, that went bad fast. First, Hollywood is apparently making favorable documentaries about bizarre, real-life sex cults; second, women are apparently excited at the thought of participating; and third, Bridget was traumatized by that exact cult but then introduced her friend to the documentary. We know chicks dig jerks but do chicks make a point of sharing jerks, too? Or was Bridget trying to damage her friend the way she herself was damaged?

“Osho” Rajneesh. Remember what I said about heavy-lidded eyes a few posts back? Add to that a beard that hides almost all his facial features. This is a man with many vile secrets. Per Wikipedia,

In 1981, the Rajneesh movement’s efforts refocused on activities in the United States and Rajneesh relocated to a facility known as Rajneeshpuram in Wasco County, Oregon. Almost immediately the movement ran into conflict with county residents and the state government, and a succession of legal battles concerning the ashram’s construction and continued development curtailed its success. In 1985, in the wake of a series of serious crimes by his followers, including a mass food poisoning attack with Salmonella bacteria and an aborted assassination plot to murder U.S. Attorney Charles H. Turner, Rajneesh alleged that his personal secretary Ma Anand Sheela and her close supporters had been responsible. He was later deported from the United States in accordance with an Alford plea bargain.

After his deportation, 21 countries denied him entry. He ultimately returned to India and a revived Pune ashram, where he died in 1990.

Continuing with Bridget’s story,

An ashram is a spiritual hermitage, usually in a remote, isolated, pristine place reminiscent of Eden, where hippies (apparently “seekers” is the politically correct term) like myself go to do yoga, meditate and get in touch with our inner Zen by trading about four hours of work a day….meditation in action. as it’s rebranded on the .Ram…like gardening, laundry, cooking and cleaning around the grounds for room and food.

There’s something incredibly seductive about living that simply…if it was actually that simple.

Normal femininity. Nesting instinct, keep a happy home serving a husband, all healthy. But no, Bridget had to see the world and “find herself” with a playboy millionaire first.

“…The reason I ended up on an ashram fours days after I arrived in Australia not knowing a soul was, of course, due to a boy. I’d accompanied a Sydney trust fund kid on a road trip up the coast to Byron Bay, where he was meeting some of his best mates for a boy’s week of shenanigans. He’d assured me I’d love it there (I did) and that lodging wouldn’t be an issue. But it was Christmas break and there literally wasn’t a single room in town. Mind you, this was pre-Airbnb, and Sydney Trust Fund Boy basically shrugged his shoulders and told me I was on my own.”

Oh noes, the fish lost her bicycle! Bridget traveled alone to Australia in order to spend Christmas not with family but with Trust Fund Baby. She’s already crossing all kinds of lines that would normally have kept her hypergamy in check. In that sort of situation, I might have tried the local church for shelter and not taken it badly if I had to bunk with the homeless for a few days. Bridget instead traveled inland to stay at Swami Hotel.

The only option I found…the ashram…was on a WWOOFing website. WWOOF stands for World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms, and it can be a great way to trade about four hours of work for lodging (and sometimes food) if you’re trying to travel the world on a limited budget. It was advertised as “an ideal atmosphere to relax and reconnect with yourself.” Leaving the beach to go work in the Bush didn’t sound ideal to me, but I was desperate.

I.d never been to an ashram despite being a yogi and all that other shite. So I had no idea what to expect when I was picked up by an almost too-jovial-looking ginger wearing all white. He drove like a bat out of hell. It was especially aggressive for someone who was supposed to represent peace and love, and I was scared as we careened away from the beautiful beaches of Byron Bay into the jungle. Everyone else in the car had wide, clear eyes that unnerved me and that goofy fucking grin of a fool whose brain had been washed. It occurred to me that I had no idea where I was going, that I might never see civilization again and that I may have just inadvertently joined a sex cult because I had no place to stay.

Oops.

No, Barbie. No “oops”. You were looking for trouble. You were already active in New Age. Nobody “inadvertently” joins a sex cult hours away when she doesn’t even have transportation. This sort of behavior is why women must be kept on leashes held by men. The era of easy, global transportation has only made this problem worse… the problem of “Eat, Pray, Love, Suck Foreign Cock Where Daddy Will Never Find Out”. Women wince in pain when Ernie Engineer smiles at her and then travel with strangers into the Australian Outback to be bodily consumed by an Interpol celebrity.

It wasn’t until I arrived that night I realized it was an Osho ashram.

Oh fuck, I thought. I didn’t know much about Osho, but I knew enough to realize I had no idea what I’d just gotten myself into. Before I left for my two-year globetrot, I’d looked into staying at the Osho “meditation resort” in Pune, India. One of the things that struck me was the mandatory HIV test before your stay.

.Why is that?. I asked my yoga mentor in L.A.

.Because everyone is fucking,. he explained.

Osho was controversial for many reasons, but his most controversial concept was the idea of sex and the spiritual going hand-in-hand. He bucked the rigid system of traditional ashrams (and in fact, even today the Osho ashram in Pune doesn’t consider itself an ashram) and the notion that you have to renounce the material world in order to be spiritual. The guy had 120 Rolls Royces, after all.

The Chinese ambassador is on Line 1. He wants his red flags back.

Her father ponied up the cash for an unsupervised two-year journey around the world for his sexually mature yet unmarried daughter? What could possibly go wrong with that? Feminism’s evil is not just removing the legal and cultural barriers to this level of stupidity. It’s convincing fathers and husbands that women don’t need those barriers, anyway. Or in Feminism Wave 3, it’s threatpointing fathers and husbands to not reimpose those barriers when they see what monsters their womenfolk are becoming.

If you’ve seen the documentary, our Osho ashram-not-ashram is a watered-down version of what existed in the 1970s…although on the first night, it became clear that sex was definitely encouraged. Usually there’s some type of “Master” or “Guru” or whatever he prefers not to be referred to as; he runs the place and guides the exercises, work and spiritual progress of us humble young grasshoppers.

My Guru took me aside on the first night and asked me if I had any questions.

.Yeah, is this a sex cult?. I asked.

Guru grinned. .I like you. You’re direct. But you’re too smart for your own good..

He was charming in that creepy kind of way that makes you simultaneously crave his approval and his tough love. “No” No one has to have sex, but you are free to have as much sex with as many people as you like. People with shame about sex think this is a cult, but we’re just individuals experiencing the flow of love..

This is as bad as it gets. Combining sex with rogue “spiritual experiences” is the fast lane to demonic possession. And ditsy Bridget couldn’t hide her excitement at being next.

The first night was relatively tame. We listened to some Osho recordings and danced. Okay, I can probably handle this until Sydney Trust Fund Boy can come get me, I thought. It wasn’t like I had much of a choice. We were a five-hour walk from civilization on acres of wild Bush. The only two people who had the internet were the Guru and his secretary. There was no service, and if we were caught on our digital devices, they would take them away. We were “free to go,. but I came to learn it wasn’t quite that easy.

I was basically only allowed to email my dad that I was fine and that I was at a “retreat” in Australia and would be out-of-touch for a while. “Be careful and don’t join a cult,. he responded.

This useless, worthless mangina is so willfully ignorant of female nature that Bridget could hang out at a sex cult while waiting her turn in Playboy Rothschild’s harem rotation without her father suspecting anything. “Hi Daddy, I’m okay, the people here are nice, they don’t have names and there’s no address but I’ll be in touch! Bye!” AND DADDY WAS OKAY WITH THAT!

I remember at the next-to-last church I attended, hearing the pastor boast about his daughter going to university. I asked why he’d do that. “So she wouldn’t have to depend on a husband,” he replied. “She needs education to have a good career.” It looks so obvious in hindsight, the damage being done to women by female liberation, yet so many men are incurably blind to Original Sin.

Feminism did this. Not us Red-Pilled guys. Waves 1 and 2 threw open the gates of Hell and convinced the menfolk they were sniffing rainbow farts instead of brimstone. Then Wave 2.5 hit, young women getting pumped and dumped and recycled everywhere by not just Chads but some truly Evil men working corruption on an industrial scale. Now in Third Wave feminism, women burn with hate for the bottom 99.985% of male humanity because we can’t compare to the cocaine highs of her misspent youth.

Whenever you take groups of people from all over the world and ask them to co-exist, problems are bound to arise, especially in an extremely small system that encourages polyamory. The partner swapping caused huge problems because despite how elevated in consciousness everyone likes to imagine themselves to be, women and men are still prone to jealousy and suspicion and love. And so, it was nearly constant drama. So much so that it felt like a reality show sometimes: The Real World: Ashram Australia. People would get banished only to return a week later and beg to be let back in.

I give props for her acknowledgment that diversity is not our strength and take back the props because she meant it as approval not criticism, enjoying the chaos and conflict caused by diversity. This was Hypergamy on drama-crack.

All ashrams have their own culture and theology. A certain amount of indoctrination comes with any culture, especially a closed-system in the middle of nowhere like the “Ram” A large part of the Guru’s rhetoric focused on our identity, letting go of whatever ideas of ourselves we clung to the most desperately. He focused on it so intensely, though, that there was something unnerving about it. In particular, he asked, .What remains when everything has been washed away? When there are no distractions? When there’s nowhere to run to? No one to affirm your existence, stroke your ego, favorite your Instagram? Who are you when you can no longer hide from the loneliness, the fear, the pain and the insecurity? What happens when you let your old self go?.

I.ll tell you what happens: You go bat-shit crazy.

Do tell.

Believe it or not (because I couldn.t), I actually found myself grateful to be using a compostable toilet instead of flushing away hundreds of gallons of precious water. I got in touch with my love of farming…a love I never knew I even had.

On second thought, don’t tell. It’s just water, Bridget. There are trillions of gallons of water on the planet. We boring, unsexy men can make all the clean water you could possibly want. “Twenty Cumz Chad” would rather lie around all day and make you do the work… which you happily did.

The surest sign a woman is becoming an Alpha widow: she complains the washing machine makes laundry too easy.

Ashrams are designed specifically to remove all the hundreds of thing we use to escape the inevitable encounter with our Self. We pop pills. We drink away our pain. We bury ourselves in work, television, porn, Facebook or a million other distractions so easily at our fingertips. We go on weekend retreats and expect the effects of those two days to counteract years upon years of social conditioning. For me at least, that’s why the ashram’s rigid schedule was easy to adhere to…it was designed to minimize disruptions and work with your body’s optimal biorhythms (admittedly, that’s what they told me, but it seemed to be true).

Ohmigawd! We bury ourselves in productive work and quietly use p0rn instead of fucking like rabbits around open sewers! Modern society sucks and who likes having excess drinking water, anyway?

Beware the subsequent link. Short version: “Bill Cosby raped me when an investment banker slipped me a roofie while I was drinking underage with a fake ID.” But the link helps explain Bridget’s lifelong misandry for the interested: either all men are rapist pigs or she’s a dirt magnet.

During the [scheduled] freak-the-fuck-out phase, I started crying. The crying turned to sobbing. The sobbing turned to rage. Out of nowhere I was screaming, .Get off of me! Get off of me!. and reliving the experience I had of being drugged and raped at 18. Mind you, this is 15 years later. I’d been to rehab and hundreds of hours of therapy by this point. But what I hadn’t processed were the repressed emotions, the stuff I didn’t get to say because I was drugged, but felt in my body. I spent five minutes screaming, .YOU MOTHERFUCKER!!!!. while I punched a pillow. During the 15-minute meditation, I vowed I’d never do this stupid practice again. But by the time the dancing was over, I felt lighter and somehow better. …

There were some English newbies who had just arrived that day. It was hilarious to watch them crawl around and struggle to get in touch with their inner animal spirits or really let themselves go. They left that night, but it wasn’t because of the jibberish or the animal-spirit guided meditations…it was because of what happened next.

…Then, out of nowhere, he singled out a German woman who had been there for a while. I didn’t know what the backstory was or what ashram drama led to his rage, but suddenly, the Guru was screaming. .You’re a PSYCHO! You’re INSANE.. It was shocking to watch someone get so thoroughly publicly humiliated at a place that was supposed to be .spiritual.” The Guru ordered her to pack her bags. The rest of us were instructed to partake in the ecstatic dance party. The pasty Brits, however, had seen enough and left in the car he sent the German woman away in.

Ritual abuse mixed with invocation of animal spirits. Better start naming those voices in your head; it’ll help your future therapists keep them straight. Skipping ahead,

“.I.m leaving,. I informed [my lover,] Wolf, back in my room, where I was curled in the fetal position in my room. .I hate him..

Then, like clockwork, there was a knock at the door. It was the Guru’s secretary. .The van is leaving to go to the farmers market and the waterfall if anyone wants to come,. she promised.

Wolf convinced me not to be stubborn and to join him. In that moment, I surrendered…to all of it.

We headed out to the … Farmers Market. Wolf and I danced until we were laughing hysterically. We explored the waterfall and stripped down to our underwear for an ice-cold plunge. The waterfall was stunning. I felt both baptized and reborn after such an intense emotional purge. …

Twu Wuv!

After that night, I fell into the ashram life, having lots of sweaty sex with Wolf, and dramatic muddy fights where we both cried in the rain. I exchanged dynamic meditation for sleeping in and cuddling. The next 10 days were a blur of routine, infatuation and bliss. I was playing little ashram wife and making sure our cottage was clean while Wolf sat on the edge of the bed and sang. His voice was otherworldly and haunting. I never wanted the moment to end. The river of love was flowing, and I’d decided to go with it. …

I also gave in to the constant guilting for more money and donated a bit more to the residence. My family started to worry I was never going to leave. I laughed it off, but truthfully, I was on the other side of the looking glass. I never wanted to leave.

Until Playboy Trustafunder was ready to take her back.

I was dying to go see an opera at the Sydney Opera House. Australia Day was coming up, and I wanted to do a bunch of drugs and party. It was the NFL playoffs. The Australian Open was going on in Melbourne. And after 14 days of porridge and veggies, I was craving a steak and endless amounts of booze. New Zealand was three hours away. Southeast Asia and India were serenading my soul.

I texted Sydney Trust Fund Baby, .WTF, WHERE ARE YOU? GET ME OUTTA HERE..

Two days later, I peaced out in a Range Rover and never looked back.

Until now.

I binged the Wild Wild Country series twice, hoping to resolve some of the mixed feelings I had about my own ashram experience, but alas, many of the residents who experienced Rajneeshpuram in its heyday seemed to live with the same conflicting feelings I was left with. Were we just hedonists following our bliss? Or was there something evil lurking behind it all?

You were living such a maximum-drama life that you didn’t just get Alpha ghosts, you got Survivor: Outback ghosts. You’ve hated your life ever since because normal life is boring. You hate yourself, you hate all men and you hate your father for being gullible enough to believe all the lies you told him.

It.s possible that these environments bring out the best and the worst in humanity…and they’re a prime example of the road to Hell truly being paved with good intentions…but what’s always haunted me is how much of the bad I overlooked in order to selfishly experience the good.

Philip Toelkes, who was the Bhagwan’s lawyer until 1983, sums it up best in the docuseries when he remarks, .There’s darkness in all of us. doesn’t make you a bad person..

After that, he laughs. Otherwise, he’d have to contemplate the alternative.

Defense attorneys are like that. They like to find the good in their clients’ hearts instead of accepting that their life’s work is helping human trash escape justice. That can feel awkward on lonely nights with the whiskey bottle.

Bridget Phetasy is the Playboy Advisor and a frequent Playboy contributor. She last wrote about how long sex should last.

“My record with Wolf is ten days while Daddy paid for it all!” Ugh, Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks. God, please let enough of the Manosphere survive through the ages to prevent men from ever being this cucked-up again.

 

This post is long because there’s so much fun to be had! My previous post discovering Mirko led me to believe he was a typical bleeding-heart Liberal defense attorney masquerading as a law expert who thinks most crooks are kindhearted citizens who haven’t been educated enough to understand that huffing paint and robbing convenience stores are bad ideas. It was also a bit dated–January 2016–so I had a look at what Mirko has been doing more recently. Behold, I quickly found an article from him calling for TOUGHER sentencing guidelines! Interesting. Does he break the mold?

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/sentencing-experts-call-for-tough-youth-penalties/news-story/2926054f0eb4e609f8f0fea36aec4ba7

A quick note on physiognomy. If you look at most people, their right eye is slightly more recessed than the left. The right side of a person’s face tends to reflect their attitude towards the outside world while the left side reflects their inward attitude. People are typically more on guard against the outside world than their inner thought life because you’re honest with yourself. This is the second picture I’ve seen of Mirko in which his left eye is the more recessed/guarded. That suggests either cognitive dissonance with himself or left-handedness.

Let’s dig into the article:

Sentencing experts call for tough youth penalties

Yay! Tough on crime!

The number of youth offenders breaching the terms of their bail, community corrections orders and parole in Victoria has increased five-fold over five years, prompting sentencing experts to call for stronger penalties for young people as the state tackles an outbreak of gang crime. [GQ: community corrections orders here are punishments that don’t involve incarceration or corporal punishment: curfews, homework, travel restrictions etc.]

Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council data shows the number of secondary offences . or offences that relate to conditions imposed on an offender following a first ?offence . had greatly increased from 2011 to 2016.

In the Children’s Court, secondary offences grew from 2.83 per cent of all charges sentenced, or 590 charges in 2011, to 14.34 per cent, and almost 3000 charges in 2016. In all courts across Victoria, the number of secondary offences almost tripled, with 12,244 recorded in 2011-12 and 31,862 by 2016.

Yikes, that’s serious. A society doesn’t change that fast without external disruptions. Like, say… immigration?

https://www.multicultural.vic.gov.au/population-and-migration

The State of Victoria has been enriched by the presence of people from all over the world. At the 2016 Census 28.4% of Victoria’s population were born overseas and 49.1% of Victorians were either born overseas, or have a parent who was born overseas. Victorians come from more than 200 countries, speak 260 languages and dialects and follow 135 religious faiths. Most of the overseas-born Victorians came to Australia as migrants hoping to find a better life for themselves and their children. A significant number came to Australia as refugees . first Europeans displaced by the Second World War, then refugees from the war in Indo-China and more recently refugees from conflicts in the republics of the former Yugoslavia, the Horn of Africa, the Middle East and Afghanistan.

Boldface mine. Here’s your problem, Victoria, you’ve been importing Negroes and Muslims and discovering they don’t behave as well as Hans & Gretel searching for a home that hasn’t been Ground Zero for two World Wars. Shee-it, that’s an official government site talking? I thought California was bad.

Anyway, here’s the smoking gun showing what happened to Victoria between 2011 and 2016:

Special note: South Sudanese, distinct from Sudanese, up 146% from 1k to 3k. I’ve a hunch this is the problem just because the datum is unique, like somebody wants to speak truth without getting caught.

Hmm, not as devastatingly Afro as I’d expected but still great strides on the road to Demographic Hell. While I don’t advocate ethnic purity, this massive growth in diverse vibrancy can only result in social collapse. But that’s not my problem today. Mirko is. How does Mirko propose handling the massive increase in lawlessness that just happens to parallel the massive increase in diversity?

Back to the original linked article:

Sentencing expert Mirko Bagaric, who heads Swinburne University’s Centre for Evidence-Based Sentencing, said some non-custodial sentences were not tough enough to stop young ?offenders from reoffending.

.The reason why you’ve got a lot of youth reoffending is because there are utterly insufficient ?resources that are being put into the type of programs that better educate and rehabilitate young ?offenders,. Dr Bagaric said. .If they do something wrong, they need an adverse consequence with that. Good behaviour bonds sometimes don’t convey the message..

The Labor government is battling to contain a wave of violence committed by street gangs comprised mainly of teenagers, which broke out over summer. The street thuggery came at the end of a year during which the state’s youth justice centres were rocked by violence and riots.

The Attorney-General, Martin ?Pakula, yesterday declined to comment on plans under consideration to tighten community corrections orders [GQ: non-incarceration punishments for criminal convictions], but said the government was working to bring sentencing standards in line with community expectations.

.We will continue to make the changes necessary to keep the community safe,. Mr Pakula said.

.We want to make sure serious offenders are punished for their crimes and receive consistent sentences which better meet community expectations..

Mr Bagaric said penalties for young offenders should aim to be as least punitive as possible, but magistrates also needed to make sure that the offender felt some form of hardship to impress the lesson.

Translation, Mirko thinks non-incarceration punishments need to be increased. “You know what’ll stop this crime wave? Not allowing young thugs to wear gang clothes anymore! Forcing them to live without air conditioning! A third probation officer! That’ll teach ’em to behave! Rampant vandalism may be unhealthy but prison is barbaric!”

.The number one priority should be the protection of the community and if they’re behaving repeatedly in a way that’s causing sexual or physical harm to members of the public, then there is a need for them to be put into detention,. Mr Bagaric said. .What they do in Victoria is that they’re very bad at putting in place active interventions that salvage these young people quickly..

Classic Leftoid Utopianism. Notice Mirko thinks the top priority should be “protecting the community”? That’s what atheists tell themselves after they dismiss the notion of Evil and discover that a large percentage of the population does not wish to live in peace and honest work. “This is evil… no, wait… there is no evil… um… this is disrupting the safety of the community! Stop, you under-educated-but-not-evil person, in the name of the Generally Accepted Community Guidelines, Revised!”

Notice that mass immigration with no effort at integration apparently doesn’t impact “protection of the community”.

Good and Evil are unchanging principles defined by God. Human Law in the Christian West is meant to be the uniform application of God’s general principles to specific societies and situations. Stealing is bad because God said so, not because the law said so. Stealing would remain bad if the law legalized it. This simple concept is how an educated, degreed, credentialed, published, peer-reviewed and award-winning professional with extensive experience wound up so fuck-witted stupid that an Internet nobody like me can and should lecture him on his own life’s work. It’s not because I’m smarter than him. It’s because I know WHY we have laws in the FIRST PLACE: to honor Almighty God. Not to keep communities organized or God help us, properly EDUCATED to State standards of BEHAVIOR.

Mister Bagaric, you don’t EDUCATE a criminal into behaving. You PUNISH him. Even if you somehow know for a fact that he’ll never commit a crime again, you punish him because evil will be punished either in this life or the next. If you love the criminal then you’ll punish him now, when the punishment is temporary.

And you call yourself a criminal sentencing expert!

The rising number of secondary offences is not resulting in increases to the prison population.

Wow, what a finish. That’s the entire article summed up with a pretty bow on top.

 

---

 

Here’s an article confirming South Sudanese are the problem as well as Mirko’s theory that criminals aren’t deterred by punishment, only being caught. It’s a bad sign when even network news blames the dark-skinned for a crime wave:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-02/street-gangs-are-a-problem-in-melbourne-police-admit/9297984

African gangs in Melbourne are a problem, police admit, as Victorian Government defends strategy

Victorian police have conceded Melbourne has a problem with African street gangs, after earlier insisting there were no gangs in the city, as the State Government rejects criticism it has dropped the ball on the problem.

Police Minister Lisa Neville on Tuesday defended the Government’s handling of youth crime after the Federal Government on Monday said “African gang crime” was out of control in Melbourne because of lenient state policies.

The issue has become a priority for both major parties after a series of recent headline-grabbing crimes blamed on groups of young African men, including the trashing of an Airbnb property in Werribee, vandalism in Tarneit and a night of violence at St Kilda Beach involving dozens of youths.

Just days after Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Andrew Crisp said he did “not accept for a minute that we do have gangs”, Acting Chief Commissioner Shane Patton said there were African street gangs in Melbourne.

“We have for a significant period of time said that there is an issue with overrepresentation by African youth in serious and violent offending as well as public disorder issues,” Acting Commissioner Patton said.

“These young thugs, these young criminals, they’re not an organised crime group like a Middle Eastern organised crime group or an outlaw motorcycle gang. But they’re behaving like street gangs, so let’s call them that . that’s what they are.”

More frontline police

Ms Neville said most African migrants were law-abiding citizens, but “this core group of African youths are causing huge fear”.

She said Victoria Police noticed youth offending “go to a new level” in 2016, and the State Government responded by:

• adding resources to the gangs squad and special operations group
• recruiting 3,135 additional frontline police
• funding an intelligence system, bulletproof vehicles and other technology and resources.

…Ms Neville said upcoming changes to the Youth Parole Board meant police would be informed when young people were paroled, and conditions would be placed on parolees to prevent reoffending.

A program that started in November was also targeting repeat offenders with intensive, individual case management, she said.

My previous post quoted Mirko’s theory that criminals only fear getting caught; actually punishing them isn’t needed. Neville is implementing his theory and the results thus far say Mirko is so wrong that the government might destabilize because it did what he recommended.

On Monday, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said the Government was concerned about “growing gang violence and lawlessness” in Melbourne, and frontbencher Greg Hunt said “African gang crime in some areas in particular is clearly out of control”.

“We lost Melbourne” won’t look good on the resume, Mirko. Still believe there is no God, when devils are running free?

South Sudanese Australian Nelly Yoa, who said he mentored troubled young people in the community, is also critical of the State Government.

Ouch! The vibrants themselves are telling the government it’s being too lenient with them.

Police Minister Lisa Neville proves feminism is ugly. Did she ever work the streets before reaching top brass?

Open your eyes, Mirko. The proper sentencing guideline for criminals who are either foreign-born or their first-generation descendants is THEY HAVE TO GO BACK! Not returned to society with a frigging curfew. As for the native-born criminals, PUNISH THEM! Make then regret they ever chose to do evil. It’s not about preventing recidivism or maintaining good order in society. It’s about right against wrong and you, sir, are wrong. Repent and take the hit to your credibility–admit you are dangerously wrong about the most basic principles of criminal justice–or stand fat and proud before God in Judgment.

---

 

One final article, this on Mirko’s concept of “hardship” towards criminals. Here’s a published paper of his from the U of Akron, Ohio of all places.

http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol51/iss2/2/

The Hardship That is Internet Deprivation and What it Means for Sentencing: Development of the Internet Sanction and Connectivity for Prisoners(2017)

Oh, Lord.

Abstract

Twenty years ago, the internet was a novel tool. Now it is such an ingrained part of most people’s lives that they experience and exhibit signs of anxiety and stress if they cannot access it. Non-accessibility to the internet can also tangibly set back peoples. social, educational, financial, and vocational pursuits and interests. In this Article, we argue that the sentencing law needs to be reformed to adapt to the fundamental changes in human behavior caused by the internet.

We present three novel and major implications for the sentencing law and practice in the era of the internet. First, we argue that denial of access to the internet should be developed as a discrete sentencing sanction, which can be invoked for relatively minor offenses in much the same way that deprivation of other entitlements or privileges, such as the right to drive a motor vehicle, are currently imposed for certain crimes.

We don’t have to incarcerate petty crooks? We only have to take away their Internet because that’ll be just as harmful to their lives as being locked in a concrete cell? Internet deprivation is what’s called a First World Problem. Not an “inmate civil rights” problem.

How the hell would anybody enforce this? There are smartphones smaller than wallets. I pay a premium to have a NOT-Internet-enabled phone.

Second, we argue that prisoners should have unfettered access to the internet. This would lessen the pain stemming from incarceration in a manner which does not undermine the principal objectives of imprisonment.community protection and infliction of a hardship.while at the same time providing prisoners with the opportunity to develop skills, knowledge, and relationships that will better equip them for a productive life once they are released. Previous arguments that have been made for denying internet access to prisoners are unsound. Technological advances can readily curb supposed risks associated with prisoners using the internet.

See again, Mirko thinks the purpose of criminal justice is community protection. Who cares if inmates get free 24-hour porn as a “punishment” for their crime? The important thing is the community is no longer being disrupted by the “uneducated”. And yes, in the report he argues that inmates using the Net for porn is okay. I actually agree there but not as an entitlement; as a cheap entertainment the warden can take away if he doesn’t behave.

But I disagree, in the strongest terms, about inmates having relationships over the Internet while incarcerated. Never mind Death Row Fan Club, there’d be an army of trolls debasing Internet forums who are ALREADY BEHIND BARS!

And those “technological advances”? Bleeding-heart liberals put a LOT of trust in technological advances, don’t they? And they have constant witch hunts and purges among the people they can’t replace with tech. That might say something about their internal belief systems.

Finally, if the second recommendation is not adopted, and prisoners continue to be denied access to the internet, there should be an acknowledgement that the burden of imprisonment is greater than is currently acknowledged. The internet is now such an ingrained and important aspect of people’s lives that prohibiting its use is a cause of considerable unpleasantness. This leads to our third proposal: continued denial of the internet to prisoners should result in a recalibration of the pain of imprisonment such that a sentencing reduction should be conferred to prisoners.

The linked paper is fun to read. Mirko is a blind legal expert leading the credulous.

 

Australia is a bit off my territory–like most Americans, I regard “the rest of the world” as a largely theoretical construct, or I did until the globalists turned San Jose into San Delhi–but commenter Virginia on Dalrock’s pointed me at a strong candidate for Mangina of the Year. Introducing Mirko Bagaric, Dean and Head of School of Law, Deakin University.

https://theconversation.com/how-can-we-mitigate-the-crime-that-is-female-over-imprisonment-51563

Dis gonna be good.

When it comes to committing crimes, humans have two distinct forms. Overwhelmingly, men perform most criminal acts. And, with only a hint of exaggeration, women never commit the most heinous offences.

A law professor should know better than this. Overwhelmingly, men are convicted of most criminal acts. Women never get convicted of the most heinous offences. But that does not mean offenses are never committed. Remember Harvard School of Law’s unofficial motto, “if you can’t be convicted then you’ve done nothing wrong.”

Women constitute approximately 8% of all Australian prisoners. However, the total number of women prisoners has grown considerably over the past decade.

Equality!

But the level of female under-representation in overall imprisonment rates is not nearly enough. It should be somewhere between 0% and 1% of the total prison population.

Equality?

…Women are even less represented in relation to the most serious offences. They commit virtually no sexual offences. Women constitute 15% of all defendants whose most serious crime is homicide or a related offence. However, the number of women charged with such offences is low given that only 955 such offences are reported annually.

With sodomy still being a tiny proportion of all sexual behavior, women being charged with virtually no sexual offences should be a massive red flag of institutional bias. Women are having uninhibited sex everywhere today and this law professional believes women NEVER EVER commit a sex crime against men? He’s calling for a target of 0% female incarceration so, yeah.

Since when does the criminal justice system have assigned outcomes, anyway? That’s another massive red flag, this time that social engineers have taken over society are are forcing their hopeless utopian fantasies upon the general public. What SHOULD be the target incarceration rate of a society? 100% of the guilty and 0% of the innocent; anything else is favoritism. If half of all black women are incarcerated because half of all black women commit crimes then all is well.

When women do kill it is usually different to male killing. Women often kill against a backdrop of victimisation and hopelessness, not because they are angry or revengeful.

BWAHAHA! Start using public transportation, you dipshit bubble boy. You’ll see angry and revengeful women on a daily basis. One week on BART (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) will give Mirko a better education in human nature than six digits of student debt ever can. Learning about human behavior in college is like learning about animal behavior from a Jane Goodall biography.

The most common offences for which women are imprisoned are unlawful entry (10%), theft (8%), fraud and deception offences (8%), drug offences (17%) and offences against justice procedures (11%). By contrast, the majority of men are in prison for acts of violence or sexual offences.

This sounds cherrypicked. The majority of male crimes is also non-violent. Trespass, theft and drug possession are always going to be more common than homicide and rape-rape.

Whoa, wait up. When he says “for which women are imprisoned”, is he talking prison or jail & prison combined? In America, prison is hard-time land; you don’t go there for trespass, shoplifting or a gram of coke. Unless Australia is much different, both men and women in PRISON there should be majority violent/sexual.

The undeniable difference between men and women when it comes to committing crime should be reflected in a fundamentally different approach to the sentencing of women. Not only should women generally receive more lenient penalties than men because they are normally more law-abiding, but women who commit the same crime as men should in most cases receive lighter penalties. This should be so for three reasons:

1. Women re-offend less frequently than men . and by a considerable margin.

Women don’t need to be punished because they won’t do the crime again anyway? Care to bet on that?

2. The impact of imprisonment on women is generally more damaging than on men. Women who are imprisoned for a long time can have their right to procreate effectively negated. For men, the same sanction is typically merely a suspension of this right.

It’s disgusting to see a man with penis envy.

Women also suffer more while they are imprisoned. They are more likely to have mental health issues and be victims of sexual abuse.

Meanwhile, men half-joke about “dropping the soap” in prison showers. Notice we aren’t laughing when we say it.

3. Women perform a greater portion of the nurturing and benevolent acts in society than men do. Removing them from society often has a devastating impact on their children, relatives and other dependants. This disruption should be minimised.

By granting custody to the childrens’ fathers? Does Daddy get an “I have kids” pass, too? Or is the father considered disposable by the government?

It is only an utterly perverse and misguided sense of equality that would suggest that female offenders should be treated the same as males.

Effectively eliminating the threat of imprisonment from the female psyche will not encourage them to commit more crime. Empirical data establishes that there is no link between severe penalties and low crime. The only policing and sentencing approach that reduces crime is increasing the perception in people’s minds that if they commit a crime they will be caught.

Side note, Mirko prides himself on being a criminal sentencing expert.

Implementing changes to the sentencing system that will benefit women does not necessarily prejudice men. The opposite is the case. The reforms will prompt a reassessment of all sentencing principles so far as non-violent and non-sexual offenders are concerned.

This will logically result in less severe sanctions for men who commit crimes of this nature. It is the only tenable approach to dealing with Australia’s prison over-crowding crisis.

You just bought yourself a Fisking Round Two with a conclusion that deranged. Such a magnificent target must have more to offer! Stay tuned!

 

It’s a question worth exploring, seeing as Israel was both founded by the proverbial Patriarchs and abandoned by God as a blueprint for nation-building and precondition for following Him. The various phases of Israel’s history each have an insight to offer. There are two definitions for patriarchy in the Manosphere today, male leadership of his family and ethno-state building. I use small-P patriarchy for male control of his household and capital-P Patriarchy for running an ethno-state.

The first Patriarch

Abraham’s story of finding a wife for Isaac is heavily misused by Churchians, who teach that Isaac prayed for God to pick out a wife for him. This is what Churchians want the story to be because they dislike the notion that a man should choose a wife for reasons such sexual attractiveness or thinking she’d be a pleasant domestic influence in his house. Marriage should happen whenever she’s ready without the groom having any real choice in the matter, yes? But the actual story makes a joke of that. Heavy paraphrasing of Genesis 24:

“Abraham summoned his chief of staff and said, ‘I will not suffer my son to marry a local. Go to my homeland, purchase the best virgin you can find and bring her back. Here’s a suitcase with $10 million, that should be enough.’

“The chief of staff set out in a small convoy of vehicles for the trip. He arrived and prayed, ‘God, I have no idea how to please my master. Help me out by giving a sign?’ God did. The chief went to her father, asked his leave to take Rebekah as a wife for George Soros’s heir Abraham of Canaan’s heir and offered the suitcase of cash.”

Not at all the traditional church message of “God will provide a hard-ridden carousel veteran when she, er, God is ready, just like He did for Isaac.”

Was this an act of patriarchy? On one hand, Abraham did right by securing a decent wife for Isaac; on the other hand, one wonders how much Isaac was a participant in the process. It certainly was an act of Patriarchy in that Abraham was ethnically intolerant of the very people he lived among. The best tie-breaker for this question is the account of Ishmael.

Genesis 16:1-2: “Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian slave named Hagar; so she said to Abram, .The Lord has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my slave; perhaps I can build a family through her.. Abram agreed to what Sarai said.”

Very stupid.

Genesis 21:9-11: “But Sarah saw that the son whom Hagar the Egyptian had borne to Abraham was mocking, and she said to Abraham, .Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac.. The matter distressed Abraham greatly because it concerned his son.”

Very stupid. A patriarch in this situation would have directly refused Sarah’s demand instead of being upset that pleasing his wife was now going to cost him his first son. Arguably, Abraham’s stupidity of following his wife’s advice is still causing suffering in the Mideast.

Abraham himself was a Patriarch but not a patriarch. He clearly had little willingness to control his wife.

The other Patriarchs

The pattern of Abraham-Issac-Jacob is one that has frequently repeated itself in the lives of kings everywhere. You have the man who sets things in motion; his son dutifully keeps the machinery going without a lot of insight or risk; and his son’s son is the slacker playboy who burns it all. Isaac is almost a cipher to us. I speculate that God didn’t use Isaac to make the twelve tribes because He thought the deceitful Jacob would be a better symbol of Israel’s perennial creative rebelliousness against Him.

The lesson here is the dangers of thinking one can make himself a Patriarch. Ruling your family well is something all fathers can and should aspire to; creating a longstanding clan is a project that will most likely fizzle out in two generations.

Moses committed murder on behalf of his fellow Jews and when he wasn’t rewarded by them for his loyalty as he expected, he fled the country and lost his claim to the throne of Egypt. Just as well, as things turned out, but this kind of immorality is a classic and systematic problem with Patriarchy. He did go on to be a reasonably strong father-figure, standing against his brother Aaron when the latter tried to cause trouble by denouncing his choice of an Egyptian wife–a case of patriarchy versus Patriarchy. God Himself weighed in on behalf of patriarchy.

The Mosasic Law

Polygamy. The practice is essential to nation-building but destructive of the family, as fathers become so busy supporting a large family (or stealing from other men to support the family) that they don’t have time to be present. That’s manageable if there are alternative social structures to fatherhood and ways to dispose of excess men, typically via constant petty warfare. Of course, “manageable” does not mean “advisable”.

Polygamy in Israel is complicated by the fact that Israel was designed by God to exist in stasis. No allowance for growth was made; Joshua parceled out the exact lands for each tribe to live in. This is confirmed by practices such as the Year of Jubilee, an event in which all debts are canceled and all lands returned to their original tribe of origin. Even the permission to marry your brother’s wife was only to perpetuate your brother’s existence (Deut. 25:5-7). That is not how anybody proposes to use polygamy today.

Small-p patriarchy was facilitated by the Law’s allowance of unilateral male divorce. This is a crude, early method of government using its authority to support male leadership. God hates divorce but, in my opinion, the needs of balancing out the temptations of polygamy required giving men this level of despotism in the home during Moses’ time.

The Judges

The time of the Judges is the one that most closely related to Gentile life. We have no divinely ordained priesthood or ruling elite for the most part and likewise, Israel’s leaders were ordinary men drawn from obscurity to greatness–a short road for the most part but not one that female hypergamy and Pareto principle can tolerate. As God said to Samuel, the people demanding a king to rule over them was a direct rejection of God’s rule over them. Although the Bible doesn’t say so, I firmly believe the motivation for this rejection came from men wanting to please their wives instead of asserting enough authority over them to restrain Original Sin. It’s usually women who don’t like the concept of written rules.

This illustrates how beneficial and pleasing to God middle-class life is, and how alien it is to manginas and the women they can’t be bothered to control. (Samson is the patron saint of white knights.) God actually gave an example of this during the Exodus with the manna from heaven. Exodus 16:18b, “The one who gathered much did not have too much, and the one who gathered little did not have too little.” A far cry from the devil’s work of diving humanity into the glutted and the starving.

The Kings

I like how different the Judges are in comparison with how similar the Kings are. Human history would have been far more pleasant had the skill to seize power also been the skill to wield it responsibly.

Once again, we have a direct case of patriarchy vs Patriarchy, this time in the life of famous King David. No man in Scripture is sexier–even Solomon didn’t compare with David’s musical talent–but what many people and all Churchians miss is that David was a miserably bad father. His son Amnon raped his daughter Tamar and David handled the incident so badly that, well:

2 Samuel 13:32:”But Jonadab son of Shimeah, David’s brother, said, .My lord should not think that they killed all the princes; only Amnon is dead. This has been Absalom’s express intention ever since the day Amnon raped his sister Tamar.” David’s advisor knew more about his children than David did.

Joab, another of David’s advisors had to intervene to reconcile Absalom with David. Then Absalom undermined David’s rule in the literal gates to the city and David didn’t notice until it became full rebellion (2 Samuel 15).

David’s son Adonijah also rebelled, mainly a power play to secure his succession to the throne, and David thwarted the attempt by granting succession to the gold-digger’s son, Solomon. Why did David not have a designated successor and why choose the rebellious whore over his many legit wives? That’s how strong of a hold Bathsheba’s crotch had on him even in old age.

Lesson: David’s johnson was thick enough to be Israel’s favored leader but not enough to raise his own kids. I’ve seem semester-long series on how great King David was but hardly a single sermon on what a bad father he was. In the long run, being a good patriarch was more important than being a good Patriarch, as Solomon subsequently proved. Foreign wives led the Wisest Man Ever astray from God while he turned Israel into a despotic nightmare, like his warlord father but on a grander scale. Israel split up immediately upon his death. That’s how bad Solomon was at Patriarchy.

The Prophets

So far as we know from Scripture, God stopped dealing directly with the kings in favor of dealing directly with the prophets. The prophets were neither Patriarchs–they mostly failed to do any lasting service to Israel’s integrity–and as far as we know, not patriarchs. Daniel probably had children, Jeremiah was forbidden to and for the others, if they did then it wasn’t deemed relevant to their work.

The only lesson I draw from here is that being a Patriarch won’t impress God and not being one won’t disappoint Him. Interesting that Original Sin is a relatively moot point when the sexes don’t interact. The Judges were often stupid with women, hello Barak, but the prophets managed to avoid that–example, Elijah and the widow.

Women destroy kings because kings run afoul of Original Sin when pussy enters the picture.

Christ

Christ did away with certificates of divorce and within a generation, polygamy. This created a problem, however. An outright ban on polygamy would require polygamous converts to Christianity to divorce all but one of their wives, and divorce is outlawed. This issue was handled by accepting polygamists on condition they take no more wives and are not considered fit for church leadership (as if they would have time for that anyway). Many would-be Patriarchs reinterpret this today to be formal legalization of polygamy with a tiny little restriction that won’t ever come up. Catch is, we don’t have a formal priesthood in New Testament times; all of us are to be as good examples and teachers as we can manage. Intentionally ruining our utility to God in order to get lots of “sanctioned” sex completely misses the point of why polygamy isn’t outright banned.

I suppose Jews still practicing Mosaic Law today can still do polygamy but that comes with the entire package of the Mosaic Law. You would be required to live in the correct geographic corner in Israel and in social stasis. If your brother’s wife is a harpy who murders him before spawning a son then you’ll be making conjugal visits to a prison psycho. Hello, Patriarchy!

Today

Israel is one of the purest ethno-states in existence with millennia of genealogical records and preference for in-group loyalty over matters of conscience. One could define all of Hollywood as “the Jews exploited a high-trust population to seize ethnic dominance of culture and then punished the indigents with their own sexual perversions”. Nothing has changed since Abraham sneered at the locals outside his regional headquarters and called for his chief of staff. Nothing has changed since David, either. The ability to create and rule an ethno-state is far less important than the willingness to invest in and raise one’s children to have a conscience. The needs of patriarchy and Patriarchy are often in conflict, which helps explain why Christ did away with genealogies and ethnic loyalties.

Not that ethnic uniformity is a bad idea but shared culture, language and especially religion can tie people together more effectively and morally than ‘demographics is destiny’. Even Patriarchy cannot be achieved until patriarchy is first asserted. Remember Abram knocked up the “differently ethnic” Hagar on Sarai’s orders.

 

I took a closer look at Devon Minnema, King of Neckbeards and his work in Dixon politics. What I found was not quite what I expected. The research was swift thanks to Devon’s history as a op-ed writer for various papers. I’ll give some background bio then fisk my favorite article of his.

From his recently failed bid for Solano County Supervisor:

http://www.minnemaforsupervisor.com/about.html

Devon Minnema is a fourth generation Japanese-American California family farmer. With his deep roots in the agriculture community, he was involved in FFA and 4H and served as an FFA officer while attending Dixon High School. He served on the board of directors of the Downtown Dixon Business Association and is a proud Chamber of Commerce and Farm Bureau member.

Four generations and he’s still a hyphenated-American? Maybe it’s just a virtue-signal.

Minnema is a Kiwanis member and currently serves on the board of directors so he can aid our county’s children and ensure that they have as much opportunity as possible. He attended Neighborhood Christian School and Dixon High School and goes to Living Hope Church in Dixon.

This explains why Pastor Jeff Myers of Living Hope Church chose to publicly attack Ted Hickman. I thought there’d be a lot of dirt to find on a Churchian who faults a man for honoring heterosexual relationships but found little. Living Hope is a depressingly generic Prot church… except that Myers may have violated his church’s 501c3 tax exemption by openly criticizing a elected government official. Hickman hadn’t made a policy statement but Pastor Myers advocated his removal from office regardless.

In addition to working on his family’s farm and his duties as a councilman, he also works at a Solano County feed store.

Thus far, we see that Devon is an extremely social guy with few marketable skills and thanks to Pastor Myers & Neighborhood Christian School, no moral compass.

Since being elected to City Council… Minnema set agenda points like increasing access to books, protecting migrant workers’ ability to find seasonal housing through the Dixon Housing Authority, ensuring that local watersheds are protected… He has been an advocate for young people and minorities getting involved in local politics as the only mix-race councilmember and the only councilmember under 30 in the district. He has spoken to groups like the Women’s Improvement Club, the Saint Peter’s Youth Group, and multiple high school and junior high classrooms.

Minnema often jokes that his constituents have the opposite reality of most people. Instead of trying in vain to have their opinions heard, they have a councilman knocking on their door asking for their opinion.

Translation, Devon has no agenda of his own except doing what it takes to gain power. A very common position for very insecure politicians.

Surprisingly, at this point I’m far more upset with the “Christian” influences in Devon’s upbringing than with Devon himself. Some men are naturally independent and self-teaching; other men are heavily dependent upon being taught right from wrong for no fault of their own. Devon is the latter: not athletic, not book-smart, not self-disciplined. Unknown if he had a father in his life.

Regardless, Devon is a man and therefore must own his beliefs. What are those? On to his politics:

Just who are the real “conservatives” in America today?

By Devon Minnema, 2/25/16

http://www.dailydemocrat.com/article/NI/20160225/LOCAL1/160229927

While moderates would probably like to label me a .libertarian,. I consider myself a conservative first and foremost. I have found, especially in speaking with voters during my recent time out of state, that few people truly understand what a conservative really is. Conservatives are not nationalists, nor are they budget busters, nor are they the so-called “moral majority..

He’s mostly right. Conservatives have proven they are globalists who believe in unlimited spending and simultaneously preaching and violating every virtue they can find. But what, then, is the difference between a conservative and a liberal?

A conservative believes in Renaissance ideals: Freedom, equality, liberty, respect, and diplomacy. Unlike Donald Trump’s fallacious supposition that conservatism is about, “conserving our money, conserving our wealth,. it is in fact all about conserving order in the pursuit of those ideals.

Do liberals not believe this also? Liberty, Equality and Fraternity was the French Revolution, not the American Revolution. The difference was that the clergy supported the American one and became the national conscience while in the French one, the clergy supported the oppressive royalists and the people revolted against both Church and State. Perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising that the French system of revolt is coming back now that American clergy have excused themselves from the light of truth.

In America, this concept has been adapted to protect the Constitution. Peaceful transition of power, restrictions on the influence of the federal government, and the protection of states. ability to make their own laws and economic systems are key pieces in the Constitutional puzzle.

This is why conservatives are so often constitutionalists as well.

Simply wanting smaller government or even good governance does not a conservative make. You must ask yourself why. Why do you want smaller government? Is it so you can enjoy freedom and liberty? Or is it simply because you don’t trust Democrats?

In America, we wanted small government because we already had a God. “No king but Jesus”, remember? Now that God has been abandoned, government is helpfully filling the void. As usual.

The Renaissance was much more than simply writers coming up with new political concepts. The Renaissance was a renewal in the Greek and Roman tradition of being at peace with our humanity.

Devon isn’t smart enough to be this wrong. That’s not a slur on him; only the brightest of humanity can invent lies this huge. Devon’s primary fault is having been lied to by people he trusted.

The Roman Empire was at peace with its humanity, seriously? Aristotle & Plato didn’t teach peace and freedom, either.

Our country is special. It is not because our people are somehow inherently .better,. or that we have some secret “superior” values or even that there is any specific cultural difference, as many nations within Western Civilization share, to some degree, our values. Nor does it have anything to do with our soil.

We loved God. That love took the form of monogamy, integrity, self-discipline, keeping each other honest and a culture that glorified His Son. That’s America’s secret. Pastor Myers is a worthless son of a bitch for never having taught this to Devon. All of America’s success came from Father God. Never by human ingenuity and effort.

Credit where it’s due, atheists try very, very hard to make their utopias work. Their inevitable failure is never caused by lack of effort. Skipping to the end,

If what you want is nationalism or military dominance, go ahead.

Vote for the Hillary.s, and Trump.s, and Marco’s of this world. But true conservatives will be fighting to defend our rights, our Constitution, and not just the bits that are politically expedient.

Remembering the run-up to the 2016 election, it’s rather impressive Devon took a swing at Hillary in a publication as leftist as the Daily Democrat. He must have been a Bernie supporter.

All in all, I didn’t have the strong objections to this article that I was expecting to. He’s wrong about the American experiment but my read is that’s because he was taught a pack of humanist lies despite a nominally Christian upbringing.

Of course, two years after writing about fighting for our Constitutional rights Devon turns on Ted Hickman for peacefully speaking his mind and sides with a mob of professional agitators. What happened between then and now, I wonder? Trump Derangement Syndrome? Needs of the many? Kicking a political rival?

Trying to be accepted by the cool kids?

Some men fall from grace. Others are pushed. Devon is a social justice warrior today because he was deceived by the social justice warriors of yesterday… a fragile, anklebiting ego in the grasp of dark forces he was never told existed.

How can a guy raised in the church not understand the sickness of homosexuality? What a dismally low standard of Christian education.

 

After years of searching, I have found a good politician in California! And he’s just been through the fire. h/t Spawney’s Space

Ted Hickman is the Vice-Mayor of small-town Dixon located halfway between Berkeley and Sacramento. He moonlights as a humorist and wrote this in a local paper (I couldn’t find the original column):

.Last week I proclaimed the Month of July as SPAM .(Straight Pride American Month).(as Vice Mayor don’t know if I can, but what the heck). “Now hundreds of millions of the rest of us can celebrate our month, peaking on July 4th, as healthy, heterosexual, fairly monogamous, keep our kinky stuff to ourselves, Americans.

Thank God, that’s a politician wanting to make America great again. And even better,

.We are different from them. We work, have families, (and babies we make) enjoy and love the company (and marriage) of the opposite sex and don’t flaunt our differences dressing up like fairies and prancing by the thousands in a parade in nearby San Francisco to be televised all over the world”

So true, so true. We are different from them. Men are not women. Soy is not beef. Homos are not normal.

Naturally, the LGBTFAGZ crowd freaked.

Unnaturally, Ted Hickman refused to apologize.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article214127889.html

Hickman defended the column Saturday in a phone interview with The Sacramento Bee, saying that he is entitled to express his opinions using humor.

“It was tongue-in-cheek and had nothing to do with my elected position,” Hickman said, and that “thin-skinned people took offense” to his column.

Speaking of his elected position, one of Dixon’s councilmen took this opportunity to tip his fedora. The article continues:

One of Hickman’s fellow city councilmembers, Devon Minnema, made an official statement on Facebook on Saturday harshly criticizing Hickman’s column as “deeply disturbing” and calling for action.

From Devon’s Facebook:

OFFICIAL STATEMENT:
The positions of Councilman Hickman published in yesterday’s Independent Voice are deeply disturbing to me. I have known what kind of person he is for a long time, but have never garnered enough community or council support to take action. I hope that the other councilmen will see through the ideology of hate that they share with him, and do the right thing in coming weeks. There is no part of the community that is untouched by the venom that Councilman Hickman has spewed over the years, and that is the saddest part. A man of his age should know better, but perhaps even that is an excuse, because really a man of his age should BELIEVE better.
Still believing in a better Dixon,
City Councilman Devon Minnema

ALL HAIL THE GOD OF NECKBEARDS!

Hey, that’s an interesting article this picture was attached to. Devon may hold his council seat fraudulently, not being a resident of Dixon. Daily Republic has a scoop:

http://www.dailyrepublic.com/all-dr-news/solano-news/dixon/state-ag-denies-dixon-councils-effort-to-oust-minnema/

Another possibility: Devon is butthurt from losing an election. From tedhickman.com the guy himself,

Dixon.s entrant in the [election] races, Devon Minnema, lost the Supervisor’s race in all Dixon precincts including his home district that elected him to the city council two years ago.

Sounds like a Convergence power play is happening. Fortunately, Ted Hickman also has allies. Mike Ceremello, a local journalist and former Vice-Mayor writes the following in Ted’s support on tedhickman.com. It’s awesome.

Mike. No soy detected.

As an observer and commentator on human behavior, the week leading up to July 4th has been beyond entertaining. Was it not former US attorney general Eric Holder who proclaimed America was to afraid to have a discussion on race? Evidently Holder’s idea of a discussion was only to hear from people who agreed with his party’s viewpoints. I find a great similarity between this and the uproar of a handful of people over Terrible Ted’s last column advocating a Straight Pride American Month.

Considering that I will be running for a council seat this November, I have been warned by many well wishing people to stay out of the fray. Like that will happen. When you have no principles, no strong beliefs, and simply are a politician, that is easy enough to do. In my case, I believe in the freedom to express ideas in print or any other format one would choose, no matter what position a person holds or what the idea is. …

Isn.t that what all parades are about, including the ones in which these haters choose to participate? Then we have the plainly ignorant whom I can attack from two directions. .Members of the City Council must faithfully represent ALL of their constituents, without favor or prejudice.. . Tim Goncharoff. Really?

Tell me Tim how the election process works. Do Democrats represent Republican views once elected? Hell, even Republicans rarely represent the base once elected. Ever hear of John McCain, Susan Collins, Jeff Flake, or Olympia Snowe? When you are elected to local office do you actually believe those people represent those who didn’t vote for them? Look at this logically.

If a highly contentious issue comes before the council and half the people are for it and half against, a council person can only represent half of his constituents. views at best. As most people coming before the council in Dixon don’t declare their sexuality or homosexuality, terrible Ted would not be acting prejudicially in making a decision. This brings up an interesting thought. It wasn’t long ago that I was in Cotati, home to typical Marin County liberal lunacy, where a racist, liberal professor had died and the council was considering a replacement for his position. One candidate got up and declared that “she was a lesbian and her partner was there to support her..

While she may have considered it a “qualification” or premium, the council did not. Did that make Cotati’s four council members judgemental, prejudicial, or showing some sort of favoritism? Let’s look at this from a different perspective, that of representing your constituents. views specifically on a gay rights issue. In 2008 Dixon voted FOR Proposition 8 . recognizing only monogamous heterosexual marriage . by 60.9% v 39.1%. The same vote countywide was 89,292 Yes = 55.82% versus 70,680 No = 44.18%. The Supreme Court nullified this vote of the People by claiming it violated homosexuals. civil rights.

The real result was altering of the Miriam Webster definition of the word marriage. Sort of like it depends what your definition of “is” is. Going on to the next point, it is being claimed that Ted “represents” the city as an elected councilman and its vice mayor. Considering Dixon’s political reputation of being anything but staid and people claiming there must be something in our water, Ted fits into the mold. I would contend that he no more represents the city than he represents every diverse view of our rather independent population. I could say the same thing about our mayor and the other three councilmen or any of their predecessors. …

So now a little insight from Mike. First, this has been blown way out of proportion by the ne.er-do-well posters on Dixon 411 Political and two opposition councilmen on the current council. Perhaps they need a lesson in basic free speech. If you take governmental action as retribution or a repercussion to a person in an attempt to silence him, you have just violated his free speech right and the freedom of the press. The same goes for a censure action from the council. Second, Ted can’t be recalled as it is too close to his seat coming up for re-election if he so chooses. Learn the law, folks, before you start spouting off. Third, having read Ted’s column a couple of times, most of it is statement of facts except for the symbol of barring the gay parade. No where in his column did Ted say he didn’t want it to occur or didn’t mind if it did. If a writer’s description of a group’s antics discomforts you because your mind comes to the conclusion that the description is .denigrating., aren’t you the one who is really in denial? I also found it fascinating how those who defend the parade want to claim it is about their struggles and the lives that were lost in gaining equality in some shape or form.

How exactly does the leather brigade of two men in the parade with one whipping the other honor anything but sexual deviance? Ever see the pictures of naked people on ten speed bikes at these parades? Somehow the struggle got confused with hedonism. Fourth, along with the spewing of hate, we have the Gaystapo going after the livelihood of not only Ted but this newspaper itself.

We have the emails attempting to induce advertisers to pull their ads. We have the emails threatening to destroy Ted financially. We have seen this kind of attempt before by the bad old boy group in town. For those of you advertisers who pull your ads, I intend to identify you and tell the real Americans who believe in the First Amendment to boycott your business. It is now a two way street. Fifth, I understand the three major networks were looking for interviews from Ted and hiding behind his truck looking to surprise him coming out of his house. Now that’s professionalism. You want an interview? I am available at [GQ: redacted on general principles]. You can call ahead so I can put on my suit. I know the wonders of Channel 3 letting Rick Fuller know ahead of time they were coming and then just storming my front door to catch me in less than official gear. Isn.t that right, Rich Ibarra? Sixth, if you think Anti-fa has a lock on thug cowardice, you didn’t hear about the Safeway firework’s booth. Seems like three vans of outraged potential criminals arrived to confront Ted. On Sunday, they ran into the American Legion Riders. Upon seeing what they viewed as stern opposition, they drove to Safeway. When several of the men decided to see if they could answer any potential question this caravan might have about fireworks, the vans promptly left, tires squealing as the men approached.

My conclusion to this whole mess? Sarcasm is a lost art. Humor is in the eye and mind of the beholder. You don’t get to dictate morals or immorality to others. Nothing has been gained by those spewing their hatred. In fact, much has been exposed about those people and the ones foolish enough to post on Facebook. Rather than dignity, the gay community condemned itself due to its blatant show of bigotry and venom. Just as much as some want to claim this is some “viral” response, I can only assume due to its low numbers that most of the LGBT community doesn’t give a damn what Ted wrote. Just as the cranks on the Left, in the media and certain vocal individuals, feel they speak for all on the Left, it must be somewhat disturbing that Trump’s popularity continues to rise including defections from within their own party, at least according to the latest Harris poll. Finally, don’t threaten one of Dixon’s own. Many of us don’t appreciate it. If you come for me holding a pipe, as I have now heard is Anti-fa.s MO, just remember. I might introduce you to a bat with your name on it …

*Gunner Q wipes a tear from his eye* God Bless America… with men like Ted and Mike.

---

I delayed posting the above because last night was the LGBTSJW protest at the scheduled bimonthly city council meeting. 200 protesters showed up per the Mercury News:

http://www.mercurynews.com/2018/07/11/hundreds-show-up-to-demand-northern-california-vice-mayor-step-down-over-straight-pride-month-comments/amp/

Hickman personally opened the meeting with guns blazing:

The council meeting began with a time for public comment, but first Hickman himself addressed the crowd.

.I didn’t give up my first amendment right when i became an elected official,. he began. .To the contrary, I swore like the rest of the council to uphold the Constitution which includes the first amendment..

He went on to say that he’s written more than 750 columns and it was this one . the 736th one . that seems to be getting the most attention.

.If I were to rewind time in order to write the column again, I would not use the words . sarcastically or not . of “vice mayor” because I see that that might be unacceptable to some..

He did not apologize for the words he wrote, however, which is what several people who spoke during the public comment portion suggested he do.

YES! Yesyesyes oh my Dog it feels so good to see a politician shoot straight instead of begging for mercy from emotionally stunted fudge-packers. This has driven me nuts since the Brendan Eich scandal, how leaders and entire institutions will laugh as they drive away profits and customers yet cringe in terror from one homosexual activist feeling butthurt that morning.

Speaking of the little devils…

Pastor Jeff Myers of the Living Hope Church said that the Independent Voice newspaper has been “littering our streets for as long as I’ve lived here,. and he asked that Hickman look within himself in the nature of the teachings of Christ and try to find redemption with the community. …

Solano County Supervisor Monica Brown came to the demonstration because she said the Vice Mayor’s words were unacceptable.

.How dare you?. she asked rhetorically. Brown said she and others were working hard to find someone to replace him when he goes up for re-election in November. He has yet to announce if he’s running for re-election.

Councilman Devon Minnema, who sported a rainbow necktie for the meeting, said the blow back that the Vice Mayor is facing “has been a long time coming..

The heat is on, baby. I got blog material for the rest of the week.

Yep, these midterm elections are going to be the stuff of legend.

A triple stabbing by vibrant women in south San Jose isn’t national news. However, the arresting pics are insightful as examples of the most visible and reliable indicators of criminal activity that physiognomy can offer.

http://www.mercurynews.com/2018/07/09/two-women-arrested-in-morgan-hill-triple-stabbing/

Basically, police reported to a man stabbed in the stomach… and then a second stabbing while they were on the first call… and then a third… and then a sharp-eyed cop noticed a couple suspicious Norwegians watching from the shadows with a bloody knife.

Alexandria “Thelma” Campos and Tori “Louise” Sanchez. My nicknames. I’m guessing from their complexions that they both have herpes but never mind. Look at their eyes & hair.

Heavy-lidded eyes that cover half the pupil are a reliable indicator of extreme narcissism and detachment from reality. The reasoning is that the person is using his eyelids to wall himself off from reality around him, either as a defensive method (paranoia/persecution) or concealing foul intents (sociopathy). Thelma’s eyes don’t quite look that bad in this picture only because her head is tilted up–a gesture of superiority, so I’d guess she’s the masculine dyke of this ‘civil union’. I bet she told Louise to hold the knife while the cop walked over.

Another physiognomic sign is their ‘frizzy’ hair with lots of loose ends. Disorderly hair & eyebrows indicate disorderly thoughts. This isn’t always a bad thing–Einstein had frizzy hair and his unconventional thoughts proved valuable–but combined with the heavy-lidded eyes, Thelma & Louise are batspit cuckoo even for BPDs from the ghetto.

Here’s a few male examples of Thelma & Louise:

Heriberto “Eddie” Seda, aka the New York Zodiac Killer. Worst case of ‘heavy lids’ I’ve yet seen, plus mondo frizzy hair.

 

David Berkowitz aka “Son of Sam”.

John Wayne Gacy. Hair not frizzy but possibly due to balding.

Ted Bundy has neither heavy-lidded eyes nor frizzy hair, showing how physiognomy isn’t an infallible indicator of criminality. Bundy was a necrophiliac so likely driven by sexual urges rather than sociopathic urges. Bundy may have had the opposite of heavy lids, the “white all around” eyes. That’s another bad one–it indicates the limbic system is running wild and the person could impulsively do almost anything. Unfortunately, women are prone to finding this reliable indicator of emotional disturbance sexy.

Jeffrey Dahmer was another necrophiliac. Significant but not heavy lids, no frizzy hair.

Frizzy hair doesn’t always indicate disordered thoughts. For example, the guy might cut his own hair to save a buck; cheapo, not psycho. Eyebrow hair is therefore a more reliable indicator but often hard to make out in a photograph.

When meeting a stranger for the first time, one should be suspicious if their eyes have the ‘heavy-lidded’ property, especially if their hair is also disorganized. It’s a warning sign, therefore not 100.0% reliable but their mental state and motivations absolutely must be checked out before they’re trusted. They won’t rape your corpse but that’s a cold comfort to the naive.

 

White nationalists are completely obsessed with Jews, Jewish conspiracies, Jewish control of the government and sometimes, with Judaism. The belief takes turns being funny, disturbing, obnoxious, true and false. I recently had an epiphany: White Nationalists want to follow the Jewish Code of in-group supremacy. Their obsession is projection. The Jews are everything they want to be.

My favorite WN to observe in the wild, Vox Day, has been hitting the immigration drums pretty hard lately. To hear him talk, the American Founders wrote “We the People” but meant “We the Undersigned Individuals”, and America died when the first immigrant set foot on the Atlantic shore. This is obvious paraphrasing but it gives the idea that VD wishes the Founders had bred new “tribes” to populate North America with, as Jacob’s twelve sons did. This idea is very consistent with his other writings on race and more generally, with the concept of tribalism that is being pushed hard in various parts of the Manosphere.

Of course, the Founders made no attempt at breeding “tribes” of descendants. One never hears talk of Clan Hancock or the Children of Hamilton in USA. They weren’t even a ruling elite at the time, being representatives of their home colonies when they signed the Constitution. The Founders were Protestants (or deists, which at the time was a secular Protestantism), and Prots define membership by shared beliefs rather than shared culture or ancestry. Similarly, America is (was) held together by a shared belief in American principles–Christian morality, limited gov’t, individual authority/ responsibility. This may have been overly optimistic of us, or not. America is falling apart while Protestantism is falling apart, while Christianity across the world is in unprecedented decline. That’s a hard trend to extrapolate from.

Tribalism as offered elsewhere is of the same sort. No distinction is drawn between nations and bloodlines, exactly as ancient Israel (and neighbors). There seems to be two definitions of patriarchy floating around: The man is head of his family and a peer of his neighbors, or the man is a chieftain with a harem. The latter is pure feminism–hypergamy and 80/20 facilitated by easily recognizable high-status men who can be shared among many women. It is also the dream of white nationalism, making large families with which to wage war against the Outsider.

That’s why white nationalism is a form of feminism.

The other definition of patriarchy–one man having one woman, with no visible status over his peers–is Christianty (lifetime monogamy, correct mutual submission) and absolute poison to both feminism and tribalism. It’s poison to feminism because a woman has no freedom to act upon her monkey-branching tendencies. It’s poison to tribalism because polygamy is needed to produce enough disposable men for constant warfare with other tribes.

Without enough disposable men, both peace and low-status men become valuable.

One area of Jewish behavior that meets unanimous WN approval is the famous “right of return”, the Israeli government’s call for Jews to return and build up the definitively Jewish ethno-state. This is why many WNs call for a breakup of the United States, because North America is too large to easily craft a white ethno-state. They fantasize about starting with a smaller landmass, moving all the whites into it and then overwhelming their neighbors with a mass breeding program. That hasn’t worked out for Israel but WNs don’t seem to mind.

In addition to shared beliefs on tribalism and immigration, WNs admire Jews for their successful exploitation of American institutions via their in-group preferences. Example, VD has no respect for rule of law except to the extent it can be reinterpreted to suit his agenda, something he has in common with many highly placed secular Jews. This admiration takes the form of projection, seeing Jewish conspiracies in pretty much every position of power that they would want control of.

Not all Jews are hell-bent on infiltrating society’s power structures for in-group benefit just as not all whites are white nationalists. It’s fascinating to reflect on how much the WNs would behave exactly like the treacherous Jews given the chance. This is what we should expect to see. The lower classes like to emulate the perceived winners of society because they, too, want to succeed yet have trouble securing their own paths to success.

Part of that emulation is having as little respect for whites who don’t share their zero-sum ethnic agenda as Israeli Jews increasingly have for ‘off-the-plantation’ secular Jews.

And that is why white nationalists are obsessed with “the Jews”. They wish to understand and imitate Jewish in-group success for themselves, in an age where ethnic conflict has been made unavoidable anyway.

 

Snuck into law in an omnibus spending bill, California AB1810 prohibits mentally ill criminals from standing trial for any crime so long as they complete a brief mental health treatment plan instead. From the Association of Deputy District Attorneys:

http://www.laadda.com/a-scandalous-abuse-of-the-legislative-process/

By Michele Hanisee

In a startling abuse of the legislative process, a budget clean-up bill has just been used to sneak in radical and never-debated changes in the criminal justice system. It allows a defendant suffering from a mental disorder to be granted pre-trial diversion and the charges later dismissed for any crime if a judge finds the disorder played a significant role in the crime and if a defendant has “substantially complied” with mental health treatment during the diversion period. In short, this new law allows diversion and the dismissal of charges for any crime, including those where a victim was killed or seriously injured.

This massive change in law was slipped into AB 1810, the “Omnibus Health Trailer Budget Bill” for 2018. The purpose of trailer bills is supposed to be to implement provisions in the budget bill, not to write substantive new policy. However, as columnist George Skelton explained last year, these trailer bills are “created in the dark without much legislative or public scrutiny” and “mostly used now by Democrats for slipping through touchy new policy..

Under AB 1810, a defendant charged with any crime can get those charges dismissed if they convince a judge the mental disorder they suffer from played a “major” role in the charged crime; if a mental health expert says the symptoms motivating the criminal behavior would respond to treatment; and if the defendant undergoes “treatment” during a diversion period with no minimum time period and a maximum of two years. Incredibly, only the defense gets to submit a psychiatric report; the prosecution has no opportunity to rebut that report with their own report or have their own expert examine the defendant. Finally, the mental health treatment shall be deemed “satisfactory” and dismissal granted should a defendant “substantially comply” with the diversion conditions and commit no “significant” new crimes while in diversion, although what constitutes “substantial completion” or a “significant” crime is not defined in the bill. …

In short, a deliberate and underhanded end run around the legislative process now allows charged criminals, including murderers, rapists, robbers, or arsonists, to avoid prosecution and punishment for their crimes by entering a short term “mental health treatment program” during which they only have to “substantially complete” the program and not commit any “significant” new crimes.

Michele Hanisee is President of the Association of Los Angeles Deputy District Attorneys, the collective bargaining agent representing nearly 1,000 Deputy District Attorneys who work for the County of Los Angeles.

The tragicomic part of this is that Trump Derangement Syndrome probably IS a legit psychiatric disorder. The Left has just given themselves carte blanche to wage total war upon Trump & allies with the justification that they’re so deranged that we cannot expect better behavior from them. That’s actually a hard concept to argue with.

Of course, the part they’re missing is that God judges the heart but man judges the action. The law doesn’t care why you murdered an innocent, only that you did. If someone is so nutcase that they can never be allowed in society again then the proper thing to do is put a bullet in their head and their corpse in the burn barrel.

That procedure would cure more mental illness than the entire field of psychiatry ever has in human history. When the punishment for being violently crazy is death instead of a free pass, people no longer have an incentive to drive themselves insane. For example, by attending women’s studies at a fully accredited university.

People respond to incentives. Offering them a free pass in criminal court in return for acting psychotic will have predictable consequences.

 

Amid dreary reports of servicemen being forced to train for pregnancy and march in high heels, a news article surfaces that somebody in Army Command is pushing back against migrant insanity!

US Army quietly discharging immigrant recruits

SAN ANTONIO – Some immigrant U.S. Army reservists and recruits who enlisted in the military with a promised path to citizenship are being abruptly discharged, the Associated Press has learned.

The AP was unable to quantify how many men and women who enlisted through the special recruitment program have been booted from the Army, but immigration attorneys say they know of more than 40 who have been discharged or whose status has become questionable, jeopardizing their futures.

“It was my dream to serve in the military,” said reservist Lucas Calixto, a Brazilian immigrant who filed a lawsuit against the Army last week. “Since this country has been so good to me, I thought it was the least I could do to give back to my adopted country and serve in the United States military.”

That’s why Lucas filed a lawsuit for not getting what he wanted: he wished to give back to the country that’s been so good to him. His lawsuit is dead on arrival. Courts have ruled many, many times that nobody has a right to serve in the Armed Forces.

Go home to Brazil, Lucas Calixto. We have enough anklebiting litigants.

Margaret Stock, an Alaska-based immigration attorney and a retired Army Reserve lieutenant colonel who helped create the immigrant recruitment program, said she’s been inundated over the past several days by recruits who have been abruptly discharged. …

“Immigrants have been serving in the Army since 1775,” Stock said. “We wouldn’t have won the revolution without immigrants. And we’re not going to win the global war on terrorism today without immigrants.”

Another lying feminist lawyer. I hope this doesn’t make me go blind… *finds a pic*

Margaret Stock. God-dayumn, that woman has buried more bones than the Third Reich! And she’s the author of a “foreign nationals in the Army” program? Why do all these cock-warped wimminz want America dead at the hands of migrants?

I checked if Stock is affiliated with the Clinton Foundation. She isn’t apart from a few donations but she is formally affiliated with the MacArthur Foundation. Both foundations are tentacles of Soros’ Open Society.

Some of the service members say they were not told why they were being discharged. Others who pressed for answers said the Army informed them they’d been labeled as security risks because they have relatives abroad or because the Defense Department had not completed background checks on them.

Of course foreign nationals are security risks. No need to complete (or start) background checks on them to find out. I hope those weren’t security clearance checks. One of the first scandals I watched the FBI bury was in the wake of 9/11, when the State Department was so desperate for Arab translators that they gave radical Muslim “immigrants” top secret-level clearance and translator work before running any background checks. Then they kept the Muslims in those top-access positions after they failed their background checks with huge red flags.

The Pakistani service member who spoke to the AP said he learned in a phone call a few weeks ago that his military career was over.

“There were so many tears in my eyes that my hands couldn’t move fast enough to wipe them away,” he said. “I was devastated, because I love the U.S. and was so honored to be able to serve this great country.”

He asked that his name be withheld because he fears he might be forced to return to Pakistan, where he could face danger as a former U.S. Army enlistee.

Portions of the 22-year-old’s military file reviewed by the AP said he was so deeply loyal to the U.S. that his relationships with his family and fiancee in Pakistan would not make him a security threat. Nonetheless, the documents show the Army cited those foreign ties as a concern.

Bullshit. Total fucking bullshit. A Pakistani national with a wife & family in Pakistan, an active war zone for the United States, is a blatant security risk. He should never have been allowed into the Army. Sanity have come late but at least it has arrived.

An Iranian citizen who came to the U.S. for a graduate degree in engineering told the AP that he enlisted in the program hoping to gain medical training. He said he had felt proud that he was “pursuing everything legally and living an honorable life.”

WHY ARE IRANIANS AND PAKISTANIS BEING ALLOWED INTO THE U.S. ARMED FORCES? I would not be comfortable with Chileans or Japanese in my military, to say nothing of people whose nations we have currently, recently and frequently been at war with. And not just “at war”, either, but doing very sketchy things with very sketchy people for very sketchy purposes. Benghazi, anybody?

What is the US gov’t doing in the Mideast??? Besides creating ISIS and igniting WW3 with Russians whose global agenda is to be left alone.

President George W. Bush ordered “expedited naturalization” for immigrant soldiers in 2002 in an effort to swell military ranks. Seven years later the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest program, known as MAVNI, became an official recruiting program.

George Wanker Bush. The more I learn about my government’s globalist conduct, the more often his name comes up. Those Gulf Wars were a total farce, weren’t they? I don’t have words for how angry I am that all those hippie protesters chanting “Bush lied, people died” had been right.

It came under fire from conservatives when President Barack Obama added DACA recipients – young immigrants who were brought to the U.S. illegally – to the list of eligible enlistees. In response, the military layered on additional security clearances for recruits to pass before heading to boot camp.

This must by why Obama purged the military leadership.

The Trump Administration added even more hurdles, creating a backlog within the Defense Department. Last fall, hundreds of recruits still in the enlistment process had their contracts canceled. A few months later, the military suspended MAVNI.

Republican Congressman Andy Harris of Maryland, who has supported legislation to limit the program, told the AP that MAVNI was established by executive order and never properly authorized by Congress.

“Our military must prioritize enlisting American citizens, and restore the MAVNI program to its specialized, limited scope,” he said.

Sanity has a name: Andy Harris.

Per Wikipedia. Interesting background: Harris’ father was a Hungarian doctor immigrant to USA. Harris himself served in the Naval Reserve, entering active service for Operation Desert Storm, and otherwise works as an anesthesiologist.

 

In the week of America’s Independence Day, the algorithms of Facebook decided that the Declaration of Independence was hate speech.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/4/facebook-flags-declaration-independence-hate-speec/

The Liberty County Vindicator, a community newspaper between Houston and Beaumont, had been posting the whole declaration in small daily chunks for nine days on its Facebook page in the run-up to July 4. But the 10th excerpt was not posted Monday as scheduled, and the paper said it received an automated notice saying the post “goes against our standards on hate speech.. …

The offending passage?

It was part of the document’s “Bill of Particulars” against Britain’s King George III: .He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions..

Mr. Stinnett dryly replied in an article about the rejection, .Perhaps had Thomas Jefferson written it as “Native Americans at a challenging stage of cultural development” that would have been better. Unfortunately, Jefferson, like most British colonists of his day, did not hold an entirely friendly view of Native Americans..

We could call it the Stinnett Strategy. Use code words to fool the automated censors! That’s not KKK burning a cross on a black miscegenator’s front lawn, it’s omnicolored flower children performing a neopagan purity ritual hosted by an officially vibrant twosome. If the computer says it’s okay then there can’t be a problem!

We could call it that but shouldn’t because it’s the same thing as propaganda and meme wars. Humans have been doing it since Cain asked God if he’s a brother-keeper.

Meanwhile, that Particular seems ominously relevant to modern life. The government is inflaming ‘domestic insurrection’ by sowing every form of division imaginable among the people and has endeavored to visit upon us Indian, er, Latin American Savages such as MS-13, human traffickers and drug cartels. I mean, mandatory-tourism guides and pharma salesmen.

 

U.S. District Judge John Mendez of Sacramento struck down one new state law that would penalize private employers for allowing immigration agents into their workplaces. But he said the state was not interfering with U.S. immigration policy in its main sanctuary law, which prohibits local police and sheriff’s offices and state authorities from notifying federal agents of the upcoming release dates of undocumented immigrants in local custody.

.California.s decision not to assist federal immigration enforcement in its endeavors is not an “obstacle” to that enforcement effort,. said the judge, an appointee of President George W. Bush. .Standing aside does not equate to standing in the way..

http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Trump-administration-loses-most-of-challenge-to-13051813.php

No, you backstabbing-from-the-bench Judge of Color, California didn’t decide to not cooperate with federal border control. It decided to outlaw cooperation with federal border control at the local & county levels in addition to state level. That is clear-cut obstruction of justice. Maybe Judge Mendez’s on-the-record lying will be enough to convince President Trump to stop wasting time cooperating with the bureaucracy that hates his guts.

I’m actually disappointed he overturned the private employer law. Implementing it would have pitted Federal cops squarely against local cops. I’d bring popcorn to a circus like that.

Per Wikipedia, Mendez was born in Oakland, did college at Stanford and law school at Harvard. No need to say more, save that President Bush was a scumbag. How could even a nominal conservative think about giving this fully credentialed socialist a judgeship?

 

First, an intro to the fisking. Turd Flinging Monkey on youTube has been getting on my nerves lately by ranting about how easily our problems could be solved if we, meaning society, take away womens’ right to vote. “You hold the key to your chains! All you have to do is want to be free! All of your problems go away if you revoke their right to vote!” About a month of regular rants in this pattern thus far.

TFM isn’t wrong. He’s missing the obvious. Christ Jesus is waving hello in his face and he can’t see anybody. Yes, forcing women to submit would solve most of our society’s problems overnight. No, men don’t want women to submit. This is not rational. Submissive women worked but men don’t want to go back to that model even when they admit it worked. This is not a failure of reasoning. It is a failure of human nature. It is the pattern of Original Sin. And I’m frustrated because telling people this doesn’t convince them Christ was right.

I haven’t pointed this out to TFM and don’t plan to. He’s gone far enough down the sexbot road that going Christian would cost him his income (as well as his sex life). That’s the point at which I stop caring about saving people from Hell, when they make bank off the presumption that Hell doesn’t exist.

The relevant video:

TFM brought up a new (to me) Federalist guy: Jesse Kelley, a tough-taking Marine veteran who calls for conservatives to scorch the Earth instead of going quietly to the fate conservatives brought about for us. From his Federalist bio:

Jesse is a Marine Corps combat veteran, former congressional candidate in Arizona, and host of “Jesse Kelly Brief.” Jesse resides in the Houston area with his wife and two sons.

Now, the article du jour:

Close your eyes and imagine holding someone’s scalp in your hands. I don’t mean cradling his skull as you thousand-yard-stare at his lifeless face. I mean a real scalp, Indian-style, of some enemy you just killed on the battlefield; somebody you hated and who hated you back.

You killed him, won the day, carved off the top of his skull, and now you’re standing over him victorious on the now-quiet field of battle, with a quiet breeze blowing through your hair. Your adrenaline is still pumping with that primal feeling of victory and the elation of having survived when others didn’t.

Gruesome, but I’ve seen this movie. *munches popcorn*

I.m not naive enough to think that less than 5 percent of those reading this are the only ones not cringing at that mental image. Amid our wealth and privilege, most Americans cannot even relate to that kind of violence, and they sure don’t want to fantasize about it. That whole thing feels barbaric, violent, and repugnant. Maybe you even wish now you hadn’t read it.

If you’re going to call uS wimps then just say so. Battlefield experience isn’t a virtue and never having been shot at isn’t a character failing. Soldiering isn’t the only job that sends men into harsh locations to do ugly jobs. What point is he preparing to make?

Look, Guys, America Is Simply Going Down

First, we all have to accept certain realities about where we are as a nation. Rains will come and go. The stock market will rise and fall. The sky is blue. Water is wet. And government in America will just never stop getting bigger. This is simply a fact of life.

No, it isn’t. God is Almighty and will not allow these atrocities to continue forever.

We haven’t seen our government shrink since Calvin Coolidge, and there is little appetite among the American public for shrinking the government. We are now at the point in this country where we call them “cuts” if the government doesn’t increase spending quite as much as they had planned.

Credit where it’s due, Trump’s administration has been quietly cutting a lot of red tape while President Don mugs for the cameras. That and fracking are why the economy has been doing well lately. Manginas are already beginning to withhold support for female rebellion in fear for their balls, tiny as they are, and the SBC witches are being threatened with loss of funding if they don’t reinstate Patterson and follow proper procedure. Why the pessimism, Jesse?

So, barring some unforeseen awakening, America is heading for an eventual socialist abyss. It is really only a matter of dates. Will we all die in the inevitable communist purges within ten years? Of course not. Will it happen within the next century or two? Almost certainly.

In a way, it is actually a good thing. God gives each of us a period in history to live through. Why not have one that is memorable? I am thrilled to live in these times. Any man can coast through 80 years of a society at its pinnacle. His life will start and end, and it will be as if he never existed. Wouldn’t you rather live through an era people write stories about? I want to have a smirk on my face as I walk through the pearly gates of heaven, shaking my head, and saying to myself, .What a life..

I agree here. The main reason I haven’t prepared a concrete bunker with 30 man-years of food for the coming shitpocalypse is because I would never use it. Endless years of sitting in the dark playing games to not go crazy? I thank God that boredom has never yet been my fate and God willing, it never will be. Live fast, die happy and have a closed-casket funeral. Let’s see what would give Jesse a happy ending.

We Can Go Quietly, Or Fight to the Death

Do you remember the American Indians? Most likely you at least give them a passing thought whenever you pull a stick of Land O. Lakes butter out of the fridge or hear some liberal pretend to be outraged over the Washington Redskins. Either way, they were the randomly settled group of nomadic tribes who resided in America before a bunch of Europeans arrived, took all their lands, and conquered them.

The Indians were faced with something that faces all civilizations. It’s something we face now. They were facing the unstoppable force of inevitability. Many of them knew it. The settlers from Europe were about to take over every inch of this country. Some tribes, like the Choctaw, chose to play nice with the government in hopes that their peaceful gesture would be returned. They got a Trail of Tears for their kindness.

The Indians were ingrates. Given the chance to be part of the most free, greatest nation in human history, they instead chose to be bitter and insular, clinging to their Stone Age civilization instead of modernizing. The State of Nebraska was never going to belong exclusively for all time to the five thousand surviving members of the Whackjob tribe.

But some tribes, like the Lakota, chose a different path. They chose war. Leaders of the Lakota like Sitting Bull knew full well how this war would end. Nevertheless, he gathered thousands of young warriors in the Black Hills and made his enemy feel some pain before he surrendered. He scored a decisive win at the Battle of the Little Bighorn, and collected some scalps. Yes, the U.S. government prevailed in the end, but General Custer and his 200 men weren’t there to see it.

Like the who? They chose to kill & die for no possible achievement and now only exist as footnotes in dusty books. If Jesse is thinking of “going Lakota” then he needs the MGTOW Gospel stat.

That brings us to the continuous internal battle we see on the Right. We have this ever-present acrimony between the factions because some of us will not accept where we are and the enemies we face.

Dead wrong. The current internal battle needed to happen in Joe McCarthy’s day but the bad guys won and entrenched themselves in a two-party system of Democrat traitors and Republican sycophants. Better late than never; the war is finally being waged. But it is not a shooting war; it is a religious war. More on this soon.

Some on the Right believe that tyranny in this society, as in all societies, is inevitable. The people who will micromanage every aspect of your life are not God-fearing conservatives. They are leftists, and they are vicious.

Yes, they are leftists on the Right. This is only confusing until one realizes the new battle line is globalists vs nationalists. Conservatism is dead and there’s legit debate on whether that political philosophy ever existed in the first place. We are now facing the real war and beginning to fight the good fight. Again, why the pessimism?

They are not political opponents in the sense that you have a debate with them. These modern-day leftists want you to lose your job. They want to destroy you. How do you think they’re going to treat you when they finally sit in the seat of power for good? So fight them tooth and nail. Make them long for the day when you’re no longer fighting them. Be the Lakota.

You’re fighting the last war, Jesse. You fight this war by living free and for yourself. The globalist agenda is total control. You oppose this by not allowing others to control you. You insist on quid pro quo, you don’t engage with society except for selfish gain, you owe nothing to everybody. Society doesn’t want you sitting poolside. It wants you slaving away for the sake of any cause except your own.

America is about freedom, about being able to enjoy the consequences of the abilities we have and the risks we take. You can’t get this from last stands for lost causes. Go MGTOW… eh, too late, you’re married with kids. But do be more selfish. You come first, then your family, then your neighborhood, only then the ‘society’ that wants to crush the individuality out of you. Stop thinking like a military grunt!

At the End, Which Will You Have Wanted to Be?

Some on the Right will flatly reject this. They think we simply have a few minor policy quibbles with the Left. They think we would be able to settle these minor differences if it weren’t for the brutish Neanderthals who think it’s some kind of fight.

This group really peaked in 2016 after Donald Trump won the GOP primary.

I can’t tell if he’s a NeverTrumper. *Googles around* HAHAHAAAA! From Kelly’s Twitter:

STAGES of #NeverTrump

1. I.ll never vote for Trump

2. But Gorsuch

3. It was just a small tax cut

4. Anyone would have deregulated

5. Screw it. I’m a Democrat.

Hmm, I’m liking Kelly. A couple more quotes from Twitter:

“How can you hypocritical evangelicals support Trump?!” Well, gee guys. Maybe because my choices were Trump or the party of infanticide

Call me when the Democrats are no longer the party of baby-murdering commies. Until then, I’m stuck with whoever the GOP nominates.

That’s about my level of Trump support, too. I’ve known too many celebrity politicians in California to have great hopes but the Lizard Queen alternative made for an easy choice.

If Kelly truly wants to die pointlessly on a false battlefield of “conservatism” then I understand why the Federalist published his ideas. Baby Boomers in their death throes want to burn it all instead of admitting their Brave New World was the Same Old Despotism. But there’s a better way to live: re-implementing the ideas America was founded upon in the first place. Christianity, individualism and patriarchy… but I repeat myself twice.

Nothing I’ve seen here makes me think Kelly is interested in reestablishing patriarchy. This explains why he thinks the situation is hopeless and (in a different Federalist paper) why we should break up the United States. Like TFM said, the key is in our hands… but what TFM didn’t say is that the key is Christianity. The needed laws will never be passed until the underlying rebellion against God is exposed and addressed.

Society doesn’t have patriarchy or small government because its leaders don’t want Father God. Not because the right laws haven’t yet been passed. On this point, Jesse Kelly is both correct and wrong: Some on the Right will flatly reject this. They think we simply have a few minor policy quibbles with the Left.

I am going down quietly, MGTOW monk style. No agenda. No desperate measures. I just try to live happy and on my own meager terms. It is amazingly effective. I can even live clean in the heart of corruption. That’s not because my faction is ascendant. That’s because I thank God for my daily food and follow His Son such as I find time & opportunity to. Was there ever more than this to being an American? Not really.

 

Not ‘my ADD life’ because I was an extreme rarity: I was adult-onset ADD and found a cure. The topic has come up elsewhere and my story might help other guys so it’s sharing time.

My junior year of college, I was a borderline genius, carrying a heavy load of upper-division STEM and loving the 60-hour weeks in the library & laboratory. My senior year, I would have flunked out of college had I not finished my degree a year early, less the general ed requirements. The change in behavior was that stark.

It was the standard set of ADD symptoms: restlessness, trouble concentrating, poor short- term memory. It soon got worse. I had trouble reading because the words on the page swam in front of my eyes. I would sit down to a lecture, barely be able to stay awake the entire hour, and revive instantly upon standing at the end of class. Even in classes I enjoyed.

That was the start of a fifteen-year period in which I could barely put two thoughts together. I did manual labor because I couldn’t stay awake long enough to sum a list of figures even though I could otherwise do hours of lifting & walking. I got fired for passing out in a business meeting while the company executives were talking to me. I began being careful about driving long distances because my vision started “graying out” on long stretches of road. I began collecting comic books because more complicated books kept swimming around in my vision, and got to reread the comics because I couldn’t remember the last five times I’d read them. For an extremely intelligent and easily bored man, it was a living hell.

Doctors were useless. I had no symptoms going about my daily life outside these specific circumstances. No history of drug use or brain trauma. Ironically, it took a full decade of doctor-shopping before one of them thought my attention-deficit troubles might be treatable with ADD medications. All the others thought it was being caused by my depression when I knew the depression was being caused by it. Whatever ‘it’ was. I didn’t dare tell them about my driving troubles; “I can’t help you except to revoke your license” would have driven me to suicide, living in car-crazy Los Angeles at the time. 8-12 cups of coffee a day was the better path.

I then made the interesting discovery that I was very good at handling danger & violence. When facing dog attacks and other sudden threats in gang territory, time slowed for me like Neo in the Matrix. Adrenaline rushes felt good. I’d trained a little in martial arts prior but actually being in danger was a surprisingly good fit for me.

I responded well to medication. The problems disappeared and I had my mind again for as long as the Ritalin lasted. The relief cannot be described, except to say the I’m now the favored right hand of the employer who was about to fire me for incompetence at the time I began being treated.

For unrelated reasons, I broke my back and began seeing a chiropractor during the recovery. He found that in addition to the bad back, I had tightness on one side of my neck from an old warehouse injury. I’d worked the summer between my sophomore and junior college years in a warehouse, had pulled my shoulder blade and not given it time to heal. Stupid kid. I’d thought I needed the money.

A couple months of chiropractic treatment on my neck and my attention-deficit troubles were gone.

Reconstructing after the fact, scar tissue in my shoulder blade from the warehouse injury had shrunk after a year–common–and in the process, tightened a tendon that pulled my C1 vertebra badly out of position. The top of my spinal cord had been in a semi-tourniquet for 15 years. For unknown reasons, instead of causing pain it put me in adrenaline shock–a constant, low-level “fight or flight” reaction in my limbic system. And that’s why I was good with danger, I was living my entire life tunnel-visioned from adrenaline. I was used to it. Also why I couldn’t read a book, or why I could drive safely in traffic but not on the open road. (Learn to drive, fools!)

I still use medication but infrequently; usually when the rest of my spine is acting up. Similarly, I’m down to 2-4 cups of coffee a day. I can’t tell whether the continued use is damage or simple age.

So, ADD is a real thing and could possibly be caused by a misaligned neck. Worth checking out, fellow sufferers. Meanwhile, I’ve learned that problems of mental performance are real and can be hard to confirm. That’s harsh in the Information Age with its steep cognitive demands.

 

Let’s walk on the wild side and get today’s story from al Jazeera! Portland intentionally reenacts Charlottesville as an election publicity stunt. Cue the fireworks!

Far-right Patriot Prayer clashes with anti-fascists in Portland

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/07/patriot-prayer-clashes-anti-fascists-portland-180701083856495.html

More than 150 far-right protesters clashed with counterdemonstrators in the US city of Portland on Sunday during a rally organised by a US Senate candidate.

Sigh, why are they holding a far-right protest in a far-left city? The lesson was learned the first time. I can’t support Stupid. “Far-right”, heh. It looked more like a crowd of ninja wannabes walking into a biker bar on pay-per-view TV.

Police declared Saturday’s events a riot, revoking a permit for a rally by the right-wing Patriot Prayer group after its supporters began clashing with the more than 100 anti-racists and anti-fascists, also known as Antifa, who gathered across the street.

Video shared on social media show Patriot Prayer members throwing metal rubbish bin lids at counterdemonstrators, as well as hitting them with flagpoles.

Both sides can also be seen punching and kicking each other.

Like boxing, hitting people is fun until they get to hit back.

Patriot Prayer organiser Joey Gibson, who is running as a Republican for US Senate in Washington state, told local news outlet KOIN that clashes were “good, in terms that we showed that there’s a political move right now to have the police stand down in order to impact free speech in some of these big cities.”

“We’ll make Portland so ugly in terms of how they allow these protesters to charge us when we have a permit,” he was quoted as saying. “The police stood down, we were told they would not stand down, so we have to challenge it.”

Oh, okay. One must admit this is a cheaper and more entertaining election strategy than outspending the opponent for the low-information voter vote. The following is not guaranteed to be true. True is boring.

Joey Gibson, Senate candidate for Spokane. Vote for him because he fought the riot cops in Portland. Valuable experience for high-level politics! And this might not even be sarcasm. I can’t tell anymore.

Patriot Protest was originally planned for Crissy Field in San Francisco until this meeting with a female community organizer.

Joey Gibson prepares to redefine “reaching across the aisle”. Yes, a motorcycle helmet is an excellent improvised riot helmet. I’m a hard hat guy, myself. More room for a gas mask. Joey prefers to fight akimbo with a baseball bat and selfie stick, shown here.

Antifa goon makes a wrong turn in Real America, pretends to be a lost tourist wearing a ski mask.

Antifa discovers some Nazis are brown jarheads. And big. And strong.

“Pete” makes the British gesture of universal respect. Seconds later, police declare a riot.

Iwo was not available for comment afterwards.

Sergeant Savage of Portland Riot Command gives his autograph to a spectator.

 

I stay in Commiefornia because there’s nowhere to go. A popular destination for Californian expats is Idaho. This post begins with the Narrative Failure that brought Idahoan refugees to my attention and ends with a picture of Satan’s Harem.

http://pjmedia.com/trending/suspect-in-boise-stabbing-spree-doesnt-quite-match-medias-narrative/

I’ll save you the effort of reading the article. A (((male))) went on a stabbing spree in a low-income housing complex for refugees in Boise. Nine victims including six children. Right off the bat, you know the unidentified suspect is not white. Whites from Idaho don’t butcher random children. In point of fact, the police had made an arrest before most of the initial news stories were published. Mug shot:

Color me shocked. Timmy Kinner… of Los Angeles? Stabbing children in Boise? Meh, it’s obviously drug trafficking, maybe some child trafficking, too. But what surprised me about all this is that Idaho has a state refugee resettlement program. A portrait emerges of NGO convergence and anti-nationalist malice.

http://www.idahorefugees.org/refugees-in-idaho.html

Idaho entered the refugee resettlement arena in 1975 when Governor John Evans established the Indochinese Refugee Assistance Program in response to the need for all states to participate in the resettlement of refugees fleeing the overthrow of U.S. supported governments in Southeast Asia. While the resettlement effort initially focused on refugees from Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, it soon expanded in scope to include Eastern European refugees fleeing oppressive regimes of the Soviet era. Over the years, the refugee groups resettling in Idaho have changed and become remarkably diverse, but the essential resettlement experience has remained constant throughout.

The Hmong of Southeast Asia were America’s neoconservatism’s first experiment in planting ethnic colonies in America’s heartland like cancerous tumors. It was a poor experience for all concerned, which didn’t stop liberals and their Republican water-carriers from expanding the effort as quickly as possible.

1980.s: Refugees arriving in Idaho during the decade of the 1980.s were primarily Southeast Asian and Eastern European. Those coming from Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia were part of the ongoing exodus from the Communist domination of those countries. At the same time, refugees from Soviet-dominated Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria were being resettled in increasing numbers.

Eastern Europe was fine; many Americans have backgrounds in those countries and those peoples have a history of assimilating. The Asians could have been written off as a good-intentioned but failed experiment… but wasn’t.

1990.s: During the 1990.s Idaho resettled over 5,000 refugees, more than half of which were from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Civil war, ethnic cleansing and unchecked violence forced millions of Bosnians to flee their homeland, and the subsequent impossibility of return for many led to a major resettlement effort by the U.S. The other half of the refugees arriving in the 1990.s originated from other European countries, Africa, East Asia, the Near East, Central Asia and the Caribbean.

• Bosnian Muslims subjected to ethnic cleansing and genocide
• Croatian Serbs caught up in border conflicts and territorial disputes
• Roma who were caught in the conflict ensuing from the breakup of Yugoslavia
• Ethnic Albanians from Kosovo

What the hell? They settled Yugoslavia’s Muslims, Christian Serbs, Gypsies AND Albanians in the same place in the US? They were at war with each other over there! Thank God it’s didn’t happen in large enough numbers to import the conflict wholesale, although I suspect Ada County crime archives have some tales to tell.

2000.s: Idaho has resettled individuals from different countries between 2000 and 2017. While arrivals from these countries has grown and shrunk, recent arrivals include a large number of individuals from Iraq, Congo, Burma, Bhutan, Afghanistan, and Somalia.

Convergence achieved. Instead of importing victims of Communism, our refugee system began flooding USA with human trash. The Gulf Wars… we American people were lied to by the Bushes & media about EVERYTHING concerning those wars, weren’t we? Liberating poor Kuwait and changing hearts & minds, bah. It was a globalist offensive to build a pipeline for human trafficking. Also, oil.

One glance says these numbers are bullshit. The three largest categories alone add up to 139% and I doubt it’s a result of allowing multiple selections like “Somali Cubans”. Whatever. Of all those nations listed, the Russians and Mexicans are the only two nations I’m comfortable about having for a neighbor. Most of those nations are either Muslim nations and/or African cesspits… people who have no business existing in North America. This is a portrait of a white extinction program.

How can they do this to us, their own people? The answer is at the bottom of the linked page.

The [Idaho Office for Refugees] is a program of Jannus, Inc.

That sounds sinister. From Wikipedia: In ancient Roman religion and myth, Janus is the god of beginnings, gates, transitions, time, duality, doorways, passages, and endings. He is usually depicted as having two faces, since he looks to the future and to the past. … Janus presided over the beginning and ending of conflict, and hence war and peace. Notice that a state-level office overseeing refugee programs is being run by a private group. Let’s keep following the bread crumbs.

jannus.org Seems a very generic NGO from its webpage. I checked the staff directory, however, and of ten company officers nine are women. The one guy is the network admin. Here’s the CEO, Karan Tucker, middle, from Idaho Business Review:

She’s definitely a veteran of the carousel. On the left is Priscilla Salant, 2015 recipient of the Amiga del A?o award from the Idaho Commission on Hispanic Affairs for political support of “the human rights issues that affect… Idaho’s growing Hispanic population.” On the right is a Somali Muslim owner of a children’s daycare and graduate of the University of Nairobi. Gotta teach the kids early! And Manosphere tribalists think Islam is a patriarchy.

An affiliate:

http://eojannus.org/who-we-are/

Jannus Economic Opportunity (EO) is one of three major initiatives of Jannus Inc., a nonprofit human services organization that also includes Public Policy and Community Health. Jannus EO removes barriers to transform lives and expand economic opportunity through education and support for those in need, especially underserved groups such as women, immigrants, refugees, Latinos, Native Americans and Veterans.

Six women, one man. All look like ex-carousellers. Apologies for the picture not being right-sized.

Jannus is a witch coven named after the two-faced Roman god of change and is dedicated to white genocide.

Conservatives fleeing California and other liberal hellpits frequently choose Idaho as a “safe zone” but it took me one news story plus fifteen minutes on the Net to discover that the liberal corruption they flee is already institutionalized there at the state level. What began as a misguided effort to protect the victims of Communism has become a feminist-operated Dirty Needle of Color jabbed directly into our nation’s heart.

 

This was a better effort than the first one. Production values remain excellent. More superhero characters are still being introduced but this time, the comic does a better job of presenting motivations and abilities. In #1, the protagonist was introduced as a ready-made superhero able to fend off a large paramilitary ambush before being recruited into a government superhero program with so many supers that the plot became a confusing blur. I don’t even remember Super Redhead’s name, she was that forgettable.

Not so in #2. The protagonist, Michael Martel, is introduced in a way that both develops his character and draws in the reader: vigilantism against illegal immigrants. If his name’s similarity to Charles Martel wasn’t enough of a tip-off, Alt-Hero has a very obvious political motivation. I approve. Relevancy to current events is critical in comics, otherwise the reader has no connection with the events and people. We have enough harmlessly ‘noble’ superheroes, not to mention generically brooding superheroes. Pick a team and wear the uniform, yes?

Curiously, the issue did not take the opportunity to introduce a villain. Ah, well. It’s still only #2.

The main fight scene was also done better this time around, focusing on a couple specific characters instead of an ensemble fan service like the Marvel movies I’ve long stopped watching. There’s still work to be done; superpowers still aren’t well-defined, for example, although a couple pages were dedicated to a potential backstage conspiracy. My theory here, developed from extensive experience as an RPG gamemaster, is that superpowers only open the door; they make the characters significant enough to operate at the appropriate level of significance to the plot and context. Beyond that, weaknesses and beliefs become more important than strengths. In D&D, I let the players enjoy their strengths in the weaker fights against generic enemies, a reward for developing their characters, and then have the Named Bad Guy throw them curve balls that force them to improvise and stretch for the next level of character/story development. That would be a good formula here also, I think, and I’m waiting for one of those defining trials to appear. That point will make or break Alt-Hero for me.

Arguably, it was already done here by Martel’s recruitment into a ‘powered’ vigilante cell. A marriage of mutual convenience and shared ideology, much better than #1’s tired “the gov’t will pay you megabucks to fight on our side”. The cell needed a brute for a jailbreak and Martel needed protection from official retaliation for breaking (literally) a migrant rape gang. Now we’re telling a story!

I’ll close by picking an unwinnable fight: what’s up with the attractive female superheroes? Any red-pill man should know by now that women aren’t supposed to be heroes, they’re supposed to appreciate heroes. Alt-Hero is following Disney’s lead on kung-fu warrior princesses and no good will come of that. Maybe most men just aren’t as burned out on sex as me. Does any other man have the reaction to a pretty girl of “She would never have one kind word for me, get out of my face, don’t tempt me with something I cannot have”? I bet Alt-Hero #3 will introduce a third large-breasted ninja princess and me, I just won’t be able to turn the page quickly enough. Female sexuality is weaponized cancer and some of us don’t want our scars picked at.

 

Several media outlets have recently been complaining that hate crimes are systematically under-reported. California even passed legislation trying to force police to increase their discovery rates of hate crimes. Behold glorious pushback!

Cops Arrested a Black Man. He Called Them Nazis, So He Was Charged With a Hate Crime.

Police officers in Crafton, Pennsylvania, arrested a 52-year-old black man, Robbie Sanderson, for shoplifting at a CVS in September of 2016. He called them Nazis, skinheads, and Gestapo as they cuffed him.

Because of those epithets, Sanderson was charged with “ethnic intimidation.” Insulting the officers in such terms was an anti-white hate crime, from the perspective of the authorities. Sanderson had made bias-motivated “terroristic threats,” they claimed. The alleged motivation increased the seriousness of Sanderson’s crime from a first-degree misdemeanor to a third-degree felony. …

“This is not what the hate crime statute was for,” says the ACLU’s Mary Catherine Roper. “This is criminalizing pure speech and that violates the First Amendment.”

I love the sound of liberals getting screwed by their own tools. Sounds like… the dentist.

As an example of the kind of thing that should be prosecuted as a hate crime, Pennlive.com’s editorial board recalled a 2016 incident involving a white teenager who made cruel, racist remarks about a black kid and “shared the result of his disgusting handiwork to Snapchat.” The teenager was charged with cyber-bullying and harassment, but the authorities didn’t immediately think to add a hate crime charge.

Hate crime laws work when they punish the white kid talking smack but not the black shoplifter resisting arrest? Are we still pretending that this sort of thing will bring us a colorblind society? Not according to US Civil Rights Commissioner Peter Kirsanow:

[Kirsanow] directed his questions to all of us, and invited anyone who possessed the information to answer.

“Are you aware of any data, studies, or other evidence, that shows designating a crime a hate crime deters, prevents, or reduces that crime, and second, whether designating a crime a federal hate crime reduces, deters, or prevents incidents of that crime?” he asked.

Neither I nor any of the other panelists were aware of such information, and so the panel fell silent.

Kirsanow continued. “Then, one other question: are you aware of any databases, study, or other evidence that shows designating a crime a hate crime, whether a municipal, federal, or state crime, assists in the resolution of that crime or the apprehension of the perpetrator?” he asked.

Again, silence.

“Thank you, Madame Chair,” he said, yielding the floor.

Knife. Twist.