Time and again in the Manosphere, I see the idea that the men women desire are masculine men. If this was true then feminism would have been the best thing to ever happen to the human race. Women would desire the most successful men, have his babies and the world would be bright and optimistic because women act female and men act male, just as God designed us to.

Ain’t happenin’.

Let’s recap the Game principles of what male traits most sexually excites women:

1. Sociopathy

2. Narcissism

3. Manipulation

4. Lack of responsibility

5. Exciting/Drama

6. Dominance (height, wealth, etc.)

Those are, in fact, feminine traits. Women are opportunistic lovers; natural narcissists and manipulators; craving emotional experiences even at the cost of safety. The one trait that doesn’t match up is dominance. Therefore, the most desirable men are the ones who behave like women while possessing dominance, or “male privilege”. This makes sense from the Christian perspective of women envying men. The sexy man is everything she wants to be and as a result, she looks up to him (when not trying to control him).

Masculine traits:

1. Preference for logic & abstract thought over emotional experience

2. Self-control and discipline

3. Honesty

4. Future time orientation

5. Not preoccupied with status; accepting of others as peers

The two lists are nearly antonyms. Women are as strongly opposed to masculine traits in men as they are attracted to feminine traits in men. Any comparison of a Christian Grey to an Ernie Engineer will yield similar results.

The idea that masculine men are attractive to women is a falsehood that should be confronted vigorously. This is straight out of Christianity. We know from Proverbs that women are life-destroyers and king-killers. Solomon was a case study. Christ and Paul advised avoiding women if it’s at all doable. Christ even went a step further and said some men would be denied the chance to be sexual successes.

Female approval NEVER gives you your man card. In fact, if women are constantly attracted towards you then it’s a good bet you’re somehow displaying emotional instability, sexual perversion or casual violence. Time to review your body language and wardrobe!

Heck, one can simply cite Alpha Fux/Beta Bux as proof that Barbie prefers the flaming homosexual playboy to Cubicle Charlie. But who makes the better father?

This pattern holds true for the spiritual side of sexuality as well. Humans don’t want God the Father. We want Zeus the “I’m the deity you wish you were!” God is overly patient, not vulnerable to our manipulative efforts, rarely exciting and way too nice to His enemies. In our frustration, all the gods that humans have invented over the years behave exactly like humans down to Zeus’ marital troubles, only with superhuman power and a general absence of consequences. Some religions like Shinto make gods of actual humans.

Denying oneself and submitting to healthy authority is never easy. Not for women, not for humanity. The converse of this is if that submission does comes easily then that’s a red flag to be investigated, not a proof of virtue.

We have feminism because women naturally hate and envy healthy masculinity.

When you think about it, what’s the point? Such shootings are a consequence, not a cause, and are therefore healthy indicators of Progress. Stopping them is like building a cruise missile, loading it with nerve gas, deploying it, firing it at a city and then trying to protect the target city by exploding it the moment before impact. No, the time to stop that threat was long, long ago, and no ultra-draconian last-quarter-second intervention can possibly create a happy ending.

School shooters are the pinnacle of liberal achievement. Teach kids that human life isn’t sacred; that they’re nothing but highly organized chemical puddles with no objective morality beyond what they can get away with. Then, teach ’em that the only purpose of life is breeding while twisting their sexuality into every unnatural fruity flavor that Satan’s whores can invent. Then, punish the kids who obey the rules without mercy while turning a blind eye to the kids who don’t. Pick out the fatherless boys with behavior problems for “special attention”.

And then, act totally surprised when a few graduates of your horror factory decide to stomp some chemical puddles in order to feel better in their sexually violated solipsism. Well done, shooters! You learned what you were taught. You even killed some of the most vile human rights abusers in the world–public schoolteachers–and that’s nothing to be ashamed of.

I only wish the price hadn’t been your souls. My apologies, but I’m not in a position to help you. Not having kids of my own means I’m as welcome on a school campus as a leper. Less so, since anchor babies probably aren’t screened for contagious disease.

Memo to the teachers and administrators of every public school that desegregated its bathrooms, preaches Godlessness and teaches sodomy is healthy: you deserve to be murdered by your students. You bred that monster, now feed it.

From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-daca-immigrants-dyrdahl-roberts_us_5a8310a5e4b0892a0353acfa?ncid=edlinkushpmg00000313 dated Feb. 13, 2018:

There’s been considerable demand in the Manosphere for a replacement to Vox Day’s famous Alpha-Omega sociosexual ranking system. While that system has been incredibly insightful, predictive and influential, the fact that its primary metric is sexual success is a limitation in as sexually screwball a society as the West has become. I myself qualify as both a Delta (by behavioral traits) and Omega (by sexual success). Therefore, I’ve come up with a political/economic ranking system. (Personality ranking systems already exist in quantity.)

The Four Medieval Archetypes:

Most people start off as Pawns with neither much success nor naturally caring about our fellow man. It’s the natural state of the human soul. The defining characteristic of Pawns is their willingness to trade their limited resources for the protection and patronage of the successful. The direct implication here is they let their motivations be defined by others or the needs of the moment; they don’t need much in the way of abstract morality.

As people gain experience and opportunities, shifting right tends to happen more quickly than shifting up. The Merchant is the “self-made man”. He’s confident enough to take risks, willing to be unpopular and defines his own path rather than accepting a preconceived one. He is not necessarily wealthy or working sales.

Like Pawns, Kings are less concerned with doing right than with gaining power. The difference is they’ve reached the point where they are the ones calling the shots in society. Kings and Pawns seek each other out the former need minions and the latter want a share of the King’s success.

Knights also have society-directing power but are less interested in using it for selfish gain. They tend to be driven either by ideology or by correcting wrongs committed against them earlier in life or in warding off threats to general society. Knights find kinship with Merchants who, being independent, are always nervous about being robbed by Kings. In fact, the most common form of Knight, impartial law enforcement, is often directly funded by Merchants.

Pawns do not automatically graduate to Kings and Merchants don’t always graduate to

I’ve tried hard to not have any category be designated as the “bad” category because any ranking system like this works best when people honestly self-identify into the correct categories. Anybody wishing a morality ranking system should check out Christianity and give up.

Where Do You Fit?

The dominance axis is easy. It’s a question of how much ability you have to influence those around you. A fat bank account helps, too. Supervisors, business owners, pundits and church leaders are all fairly dominant whereas work that involves little social contact or impact on society are not.

The selfish-social axis is harder. Maslow’s hierarchy provides a “current” pushing one rightward but one’s worldview and natural abilities also play large roles. Indicative questions:

Do I view life as a zero-sum game?

Can I provide for myself during hard times?

Do I have strong in-group preferences?

Would I continue working if I won the lottery?

Don’t be too quick to self-identify as a Merchant. Being a Pawn is safe, effective and rewarding with minimal effort. All that most people want from life is knowing that they and their families will be provided for.

Women never reach the Knight category. That’s a near-impossible level of mental abstraction and independence for them.

Implications/Predictions

Kings favor aggression and constant, low-level violence, much like the sexual Alpha and for a similar reason: maintaining one’s success becomes its own job. Women being natural Pawns, are attracted first to Kings and then to Pawns. Successful Merchants can score women in a stable society but their independent lives can become liabilities if wifey can frivorce them during the inevitable low points.

Identity politics are the bread and butter of the King/Pawn setup. Clear definitions of loyalties and a lack of (acted-upon) selfish counter-interests make it a very strong setup. The price, however, is slavery and lack of imagination. The Merchant/Knight setup maximizes freedom and innovation at the price of solidarity. The KP setup is extremely hostile towards the MK setup because given the chance, Kings will harm people who aren’t personally loyal to them before they harm people who are. If they don’t have a strong protector then many will make a point of doing so. MKs aren’t naturally hostile in return–your life, your choice, they might say–but not being stupid, they realize that strong Kings are existential threats. This is typically what gives rise to Knights in the first place.

A possible reason so many Americans were able to be duped into supporting weaponized immigration is because the Baby Boomers contained an unusually high percentage of Merchants. Lacking the strong in-group preferences of Pawns, supporting immigration for the emotional hit of virtue-signaling was an easy mistake, especially since the perpetrators of modern immigration had a stranglehold on news media at the time to prevent feedback.

Many Merchants today wish they were Pawns but can’t find a King offering them a tolerable deal. A typical example is an alt-Righter who refers to Donald Trump as “the God-Emperor”. I don’t think they mean it ironically; I think they mean it as, they hope the current President sweeps all their troubles away and brings them the success, safety and (frankly) continued existence that the Left tries so hard to exterminate.

Man Accuses #MeToo Leader of Sexual Misconduct

Feb. 8, 2018

http://www.yahoo.com/news/male-staffer-accuses-california-assemblywoman-misconduct-003752466.html

Black Lives Matter is upset after the Super Bowl riots because police went easier on disorganized white rioters who didn’t attack cops then they normally go on organized black rioters who do attack cops:

“Somehow, it seems there’s a line drawn in the sand where destruction of property because of a sports victory is OK and acceptable in America. However, if you have people who are fighting for their most basic human right, the right to live, they will be condemned,” Black Lives Matter New York President Hawk Newsome told Newsweek. …

Emergency responders struggled to keep up with rioters as they marched through Philadelphia streets leaving destruction in their wake. Revelers reportedly ripped down light posts, caused entire structures to collapse, and damaged vehicles and store buildings as they celebrated the Eagles’ 41-33 victory.

But officials appeared slow to condemn the destruction caused by rioters, offering seemingly gentle requests for everyone to “go home.” …

“Still going strong in the [Office of Emergency Management]. But, if everyone could go home that would be great,” Philadelphia Police Sergeant Brian Geer wrote on Twitter at 9:30 p.m., adding: “We have to get some rest to start planning a parade in the morning.” …

Newsome called the lack of condemnation from officials “a glaring example of white privilege.”

“You can riot if you’re white and your team wins, but if you’re black and being killed, you can’t speak out,” he added.

Black Lives Matter, which works to raise awareness around racial inequality and police brutality, first came under the public spotlight after organizing protests in response to the death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, a black teenager, who was fatally shot by George Zimmerman, a white man, [GQ: not white] while walking home from a convenience store with a bag of Skittles and a drink.

Since then, the group has faced strong opposition from law enforcement and groups like Blue Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. A recent survey conducted last year also found that 57 percent of people in America had an “unfavorable view” of BLM, with the majority of those opposed to the group being white.

Not surprising when blacks introduced the concept of “my race, right or wrong” to North America. It must suck to watch police go lighter on drunken idiots than “Knockout Game” players avenging their local drug pusher. And of course, it doesn’t help when one proves his case by lying about the facts of his case.

<–Zimmerman Trayvon Martin–>

Black Lives Matter
Blacks Love Misery
Black Liberal Minions
Bitches Love Money
Burn Loot Maim
Bitter Losers Marching
Behaving Like Muslims
Begging for Lives of Mediocrity
Businesses Leaving Motown

Add your own!

Starting with http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Legislature-releases-details-of-sexual-harassment-12547495.php

SACRAMENTO . The state Senate and Assembly released a cache of documents Friday revealing 20 substantiated complaints of sexual harassment or inappropriate behavior against lawmakers or high-level legislative staffers over the past 12 years.

The nearly 100 pages of documents include cases against six current and former elected officials: Republican gubernatorial candidate Travis Allen, an Assemblyman from Huntington Beach (Orange County); Assemblywoman Autumn Burke, D-Inglewood (Los Angeles County); Sen. Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys; former Assemblyman Raul Bocanegra, D-San Fernando Valley (Los Angeles County); former Sen. Roderick Wright, D-Inglewood; and suspended Sen. Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia (Los Angeles County).

The article goes on to give case-by-case details. But we should forgive them because they try to be champions and models:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5358395/Ex-San-Fran-mayor-says-learned-affair.html

A top California official who had an affair with a subordinate more than 10 years ago while he was mayor of San Francisco says a culture of “toxic masculinity” is fueling violence against women in America.

Gavin Newsom, California’s lieutenant governor who is running for governor of the Golden State in elections scheduled for later this year, was asked about the affair in light of the #MeToo movement.

Newsom was recently asked in an interview in front of an audience at the University of San Francisco why voters in California should consider him for governor given his past indiscretions.

.I would say the same thing that I said (then) to the voters in San Francisco: that I acknowledged it. I apologized for it. I learned an enormous amount from it,. Newsom said according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

And I am every day trying to be a champion and a model – not just for women and girls – but to deal with the issue that we need to focus on, which is the crisis with men and boys in this state and in this country..

Maybe women should choose a man who never committed adultery to be a champion & model of healthy masculinity? But I doubt that’s who they’ll actually choose because honest men are bad for drama. And so in the Gynocracy of Commiefornia, the gatekeepers of public morality are its most spectacular failures. “Follow my example,” Newsom might say. “I porked my campaign manager’s wife, destroyed his marriage and got away with it by saying Oops when I was found out… vote for me!”

At least #MeToo promises to make midterm elections interesting.

If it wasn’t official before, the D.C. Diocese of the Episcopal Church is in full, feminist-fueled rebellion against Almighty God.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/u.s.-episcopal-diocese-votes-to-stop-using-masculine-pronouns-for-god1

The Episcopal church in the Diocese of Washington, D.C., passed a resolution last week to stop using masculine pronouns for God in future updates to its Book of Common Prayer.

.Over the centuries our language and our understanding of God has continued to change and adapt,. the drafters of the resolution stated. The drafters said that referring to God using masculine pronouns is to “limit our understanding of God.”

“By expanding our language for God, we will expand our image of God and the nature of God,” they stated.

But Clergy delegate The Rev. Linda R. Calkins from St. Bartholomew’s Episcopal Church in Laytonsville, Maryland, challenged the delegates to go further.

Calkins read from Genesis Chapter 17, in which God tells Abraham .I am El Shaddai.” She said that if Episcopalians “are going to be true to what El Shaddai means, it means God with breasts..

.Having studied much feminist theology in my masters. degrees, I wrote a thesis on liberation and freedom and non-equality in feminist theology and existential counseling,. Calkins told the delegates, as reported by The Institute On Religion & Democracy.

Unholy succubi, Batman! She’s trying to alter God’s nature by changing the words used to describe God’s nature. I’ve blogged before about the uneasy association between women and reality but this is the same as claiming the Author of Life is a social construct.

They blaspheme the name of Christ. Let’s see what we can expose with this convenient PDF they published. I archived it on my site because future generations need to see exactly what we’re complaining about.

Buckle up.

Beginning on Page 12, we have a photo directory of the Diocese’s fresh blood. The count is… 32 men and 6 women. Wow, that’s not at all what I was expecting. Wigs seem to be the fashion in D.C., though. Hang on… wait… FFS, these are women?

Oops, one of them is male. Guess which? Yeah, it seems like all this transgendering is nothing but women turning themselves into men in defiance of DNA. They should call it retrogendering.

Actual count is 12 men, 26 women. I think.

Moving on to finances on page 34, the diocese is in the black. A full 30% of diocese income is a “1973 Ruth Soper Fund”. A quick Net search turned up a very interesting article:

http://www.virtueonline.org/diocese-washington-gains-control-mrs-soper%E2%80%99s-millions

When the Diocese of Washington became short of money in [about 1999], the administration began to use interest from the Soper Trust for its operating costs. Within the diocese, numerous arguments and resolutions came out of the internal conflict over the Soper Trust, including a successful 2002 convention vote requesting that the administration of the diocese cease from using her money for operating costs and use it only for direct ministries to help suffering humanity.

Diocesan officials continued its practice of using the Soper money for operating expenses. Then in 2010 without making this information known publicly to the General Convention of the Diocese of Washington, officials quietly initiated the lawsuit to end the Soper Trust. …

So this long saga, beginning with Mrs. Soper’s generous contributions to many charities, ended sadly. In 1967 when designing her will, Ruth Gregory Soper believed that her money and its ensuing legacy be supervised by a bank she trusted, Riggs Bank and its successor, PNC Bank. The Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler seemed to consider the Soper Trust almost inconsequential and refused to help preserve this over 40-year-old trust.

As the trustee, PNC struggled to honor Mrs. Soper’s wishes, yet their lawyers lost the war following court decisions. A second trustee, Thomas D. Murphy, took the lead of the Soper Trust and, in less than two weeks, allowed the entire trust to be terminated and the money turned over to the financially strapped Episcopal Diocese of Washington.

That’s some dirty pool, there. I wonder how many other converged churches are quietly making money grabs… and timing the money to die when they do. The D.C. diocese is timing the Soper fund to run out in 20 years per footnotes on page 43.

Skipping ahead to Resolution #1 -On Becoming a Sanctuary Diocese, page 93:

Resolved, that the people of the Diocese of Washington, as disciples of Jesus Christ and persons of faith and conscience, take seriously the biblical mandate not to wrong or oppress the alien in our midst, and in faithfulness to our Baptismal Covenant, oppose the policies of the incumbent Executive Branch that target undocumented immigrants for deportation while also placing undue restrictions on refugees seeking safe haven in the U.S…

Hey, it’s Trump Derangement Syndrome! TDS sufferers, did you know it’s illegal to oppose Trump’s immigration enforcement efforts? It’s “8 U.S. Code ? 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens” and punishable by up to 5 years per illegal alien.

Dear God, there is no bottom to the immigration war. No words to explain it with. I used to think it was misguided altruism but that doesn’t begin to explain the furor and intensity with which the SJWs want to flood the West with vibrants.

Resolution #2 – On Inclusion of Transgendered People

Resolved, that Th e Episcopal Diocese of Washington affirms that all transgender people, and anyone whose gender identity and expression differs from that assigned at birth, are beloved children of God…

“Assigned at birth” means freaking DNA. Gender is not a social construct because YOU CAN SEE IT UNDER A MICROSCOPE!

and be it further Resolved, that The Episcopal Diocese of Washington support educational, pastoral, liturgical, and legislative efforts that seek to end the systemic violence against transgender people, calling special attention to the rise in violence against transgender women of color;

What systematic violence? My ancestors let you take over the government, the Church, the courts and the working world, and today men like me hide for our own safety. I hear UK police chiefs are giving you cry rooms and menopause leave. Oh, right. It’s a microscope thing.

and be it further Resolved, that the Episcopal Diocese of Washington encourage all parishes to remove all obstacles to full participation in congregational life by making all gender-specific facilities and activities fully accessible, regardless of gender identity and expression.

Two words: children’s bathrooms.

Resolution #3 – On the Gendered Language for God

Covered above.

I nearly missed a dustup between youTube MGTOWs Turd Flinging Monkey & DDJ on one side, and MGTOW 101, Kris Cantu & Angry MGTOW, the makers of some kind of Red Pill Cryptocurrency, on the other. The latter made accusations and attacks on sponsors against the former… DDJ gives an excellent recap for the interested:

While I’m not familiar with the principals, the matter seems straightforward. Cantu & associates tried to monetize the MGTOW movement, the monetization turned out to be fraudulent and onetime allies got stuck between dollars and buddies.

There’s an adage that you never go into business with family or friends. Excellent advice. It’s hard to separate “Larry, your bowling partner” from “Larry, the nitwit who convinced you to invest your life savings in Sears and Marvel Comics”. Same thing with MGTOW. It isn’t something that is meant to be profitable, heck, if society was healthy then MGTOW wouldn’t be something that would exist. We men would be getting rich the simple way, mixing work ethic with frugal spending.

Buy the T-shirt? Sure! Subscribe to get more content/entertainment? Of course! But once big money gets involved, fallout is more likely than not. There’s too much anonymity in the MGTOW movement and often, too much plain old wishful thinking… and if money starts disappearing then fingers start pointing. Desperation is an ugly thing.

Friends don’t give friends investment opportunities.

There’s a discussion on servant leadership and Christ’s foot-washing scene on Dalrock’s that has gone so far awry that commenting is pointless. So…

The setting was the Last Supper. Christ’s betrayal and Crucifixion was imminent. He used his final opportunity to prepare His disciples for succeeding Him. That was when He did the foot-washing, a chore reserved for the shit-listed of the household in an age when people walked everywhere in sandals on dusty/muddy roads. Christ & disciples being guests, it would have been exceptionally bad manners to make them clean themselves. Hence Peter’s complaint of Christ’s doing it. Christ was too important to get dirty!

Christ got dirty. His explanation in John 13:14-16: “If I then, the Lord and the Teacher, washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I gave you an example that you also should do as I did to you. Truly, truly, I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.”

He quickly emphasized the point in 13:34: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.”

That was the purpose of the foot-washing and the sermon of the Last Supper. Those who would lead the Church in Christ’s absence were to be the servants of the Church, not its beneficiaries like the Levites and Pharisees.

Judas sold out to the devil on the spot. Apparently, he’d been on Team Jesus for the status and promise of fat pickings. The instant Christ said & demonstrated that he’d be doing the Church’s scut work was the instant the Pharisees’ counter-offer of 30 silver became the smart move.

The foot-washing scene had nothing to do with marriage. It’s out of context and inconsistent with plainly stated marital commands. It does have everything to do with… projection.

Modern clergy are modern Judases and here’s the proof: they do not love us, the Church’s Joes and Janes. Oh, they say all the right words and do all the right rituals… but they shun the non-academic, increasingly hard lives we must live. They aren’t concerned for the welfare of the falsely accused. They poison their own daughters to never trust a husband. And if little Timmy now has to use the girl’s bathroom at the local school, well, just enroll your kids in my parochial school. We have a special exemption!

Consequently, modern clergy project Christ’s principle of servant-leadership onto other men that Christ didn’t teach it to because they’re constantly aware of their own guilt.

Pharisees. Judases. On a good day, Levites. Christ found them all unfit and replaced all formal Church authority with “give a damn about your fellow man”. That is, after all, the reason Christ accepted Crucifixion.

Tonight (eh, early AM tomorrow) is a lunar eclipse of a supermoon, also a blue moon. Those of us who live alone can easily head outside to enjoy it 3:48am-7:11am.

I hope my boss won’t have anything taxing for my brain tomorrow….

Sourced from wikipedia (infogalactic is surprisingly limited today):

1999: entered politics in Pico Rivera City Council

2002: Mayor of Pico Rivera

2003: Weak run for Congress

2010: Mayor of Pico Rivera

February 2010: Salcido had a Bible removed from the City Council Dais for violating the U.S. Constitution’s establishment clause.

July 2010: Salcido was reprimanded and placed on administrative leave after a parent complained about his conduct in the classroom. A parent alleged that his 16 year old daughter had been threatened by Salcido and had made inappropriate insulting comments about race and other students and their parents. One student complained that Salcido had said, “shut up Kelly before I kill you.”

This link is definitely worth reading: http://www.sbsun.com/2010/07/23/salcido-repimanded-but-will-return-to-teach-in-the-fall/

2011: Salcido was fined by the California Fair Political Practices Commission for campaign finance violations in accord with California law and was fined $2,500.

May 2012: Salcido was placed on administrative leave after the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department received a complaint that he had struck a student. Salcido admitted he had struck the student because the student had been disruptive by sleeping in class. The child, named David, also alleged that Salcido bullied and teased him by making fun of his weight and appearance calling him “Chaz Bono”.

2015: Mayor of Pico Rivera

January 2018: A video made by a student of Gregory Salcido lecturing about the military after seeing a student with a U.S. Marines shirt goes viral. In the video, Salcido stated, “We.ve got a bunch of dumbshits over there. Think about the people who you know who are over there . your freaking stupid uncle Louis or whatever, they’re dumbshits. They’re not, like, high-level thinkers, they’re not academic people, they’re not intellectual people, they’re the freaking lowest of our low. Not morally, I’m not saying they make bad moral decisions, they’re not talented people”.

Quote from the pico-rivera.org website: “Councilman Salcido credits his students for being a constant reminder that keeping a positive and optimistic disposition is necessary for a productive future.” Hah, he didn’t know how right he was. Well done, student!

We need to start finding each other. Not for political purposes or building a community but simply for friendship with men we can trust to not betray us. The matter is difficult because any explicit signal can and will be picked up by women; also, because many MGTOWs don’t even recognize the acronym and aren’t part of the Manosphere.

Of course, the risk of explicit signaling is offset by optimal rewards. Wearing shirts from returnofkings.com or crypto.fashion in crowds can get quick results. Better when tried at masculine-appealing events like a demolition derby rather then your local grocery. Similarly, consider saying hello to a guy who wears such a shirt.

On a more general note, any Manospherian worth the time he wastes on the Internet is going to look the part. Be physically fit, short-haired, no problem glasses. man-boobs or (God help us) ear gauges.

Most churches are hopelessly cucked-up but if you’re attending anyway, check out the back row. Look for men sitting by themselves quietly rolling their eyes or reading magazines hidden in their Bibles.

Socially, men bond best over shared activities. The best such activities for men are ones that involve levels of mathematics that are toxic to women. Specifically, wargaming, D&D-style roleplaying games and Magic: the Gathering. These are practically engraved invitations to new social circles. I know from personal experience that military guys have used games to quickly socialize after transfers for many years.

A good starter wargame today is Infinity, infinitythegame.com . The entire rulebook is available as a free download and the size of typical games is 10-15 models. Very affordable. (Take a hint, Warhammer 40k.) It also has a formal tournament organization. Women don’t like to compete.

Of course, games has been as badly converged as anything else in modern culture. Just look at the cover of Starfinder, the most recent A-list RPG released:

WTF is the SJW fascination with purple hair? Never mind; knowing will not make me happy.

Still and all, it’s easy enough to clean up the material for actual playing. Once you find a group with no female players, it’s a good bet there’s MGTOWs in residence because “no girlfriends present at guy night” doesn’t happen without intentional effort.

This post was inspired by http://qz.com/1182715/why-the-uk-appointed-a-minister-for-loneliness-epidemic-leads-to-early-deaths/ . The British government has appointed politician Tracey Crouch as the minister to tackle the epidemic of loneliness.

Facepalm. For an article linked to in the previous,

.With an increasing aging population, the effect on public health is only anticipated to increase. Indeed, many nations around the world now suggest we are facing a “loneliness epidemic,.. Holt-Lunstad said in a press release. The research is forthcoming in the journal American Psychologist. [Julianne] Holt-Lunstad also presented her findings (pdf) to the US Senate Aging Committee in April 2017.

“Such .epidemics,. while not confined to rich countries, are linked to prominent features of affluent culture: longer life expectancy, decreasing marriage rates, people having fewer children, more people getting divorced, and more people living alone. In January, UK lawmakers set up a commission to tackle loneliness.inspired by the murder of Jo Cox, a member of parliament who was passionate about the issue.which is now working with a range of charities focused on at-risk groups including the elderly, refugees, young people, and new parents.”

Four of the five cited reasons are related by causation. The gov’t destroyed the nuclear family and now wonders why so many people don’t have families. Clearly, we don’t yet have enough government to be happy!

Of course, the open destruction of male spaces is not even referenced in any of the articles or links. It’s officially illegal under gov’t anti-discrimination laws for men to associate outside female supervision. Not allowing men to be friends with men, outside homosexual trysts, might have something to do with men not having male friends.

As usual, it’s up to us to make friends & family despite the efforts of the Powers That Be. Never because of their efforts. They are the problem, not the solution.

Aaron Clarey is an interesting guy. His book “Enjoy the Decline” is an excellent book on making peace with the fall of America and influenced me significantly. His insider book on real estate attitudes leading up to the Second Depression is also worth reading. He practically founded the concept “MGTOW” then disavowed it, while still living it, and has recently re-acknowledged it. Read his post at http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-revalidation-of-mgtow.html .

I believe Clarey is okay with second-wave feminism. This explains why he first assisted and then disavowed the MGTOW movement. He’s fine with women as peers of men, equal opportunity and such, but wasn’t willing to connect “women are just like men” with the consequences of letting women act like men: increasing numbers of real men whose lives are torn asunder by women who found them unsexy, unworthy or boring. He complains that such men “make a religion” out of hating all the poor-quality women in their lives. Just man up and attract a better class of woman, Chubby!

What he seeks is the unstable equilibrium of women who have been freed to act like men yet choose to continue acting like women.

Speaking of religion, do atheists ever wonder why this is happening? The whole feminism & social justice headache? If it was a mere social experiment then it would have been shut down by its own proponents in failure by now. There is something in the human soul that drives men to appease women even to the point of self-destruction while women, given the chance, will burn society (men) to ash before admitting they should not hold the reins of power.

Christianity is the only explanation for these tendencies, which cut across all ethnic and cultural barriers. If there’s a second one then let me know. Certainly not evolution. If evolution was true then freeing a woman to act like a man would only see her insist on acting like a woman.

Clarey’s post is one of a second-wave feminist being forced to acknowledge the third wave of feminism. If he accepts the latter as an extension of the former then he’ll hold a validation of Christianity. If instead he believes there’s no connection then we’ll soon see him speculate about which outside force made the servant hate the master who place she usurped. At the moment, he seems to be undecided:

“There is a conscious (and sadly, unconscious) purposed effort in some segments of society, many of those institutions (like academia, the legal profession, etc.), to hate men. And not only hate men, but to make masculinity illegal.”

I entirely agree, Mr. Clarey. The next question: WHY do they hate men? Because men treat them as chattel… or as equals?

A quick, fun fisking of “Survey: Mayors view climate change as pressing urban issue” from https://www.yahoo.com/news/survey-mayors-view-climate-change-pressing-urban-issue-070226006.html

BOSTON (AP) . U.S. mayors increasingly view climate change as a pressing urban issue, so much so that many advocate policies that could inconvenience residents or even hurt their cities financially.

If the planet’s biosphere is so delicate that its survival depends upon unified global urban planning then we’re screwed because the next volcanic eruption will cause more pollution than a hundred cities in a century. You’ve oversold the climate change threat just a tad.

(Look, the Phillipines had a volcanic eruption just this week!)

The annual survey of big-city executives, slated for release on Tuesday by the Boston University Initiative on Cities, also reflected the nation’s sharp political divide. Ninety-five percent of Democratic mayors who responded believed climate change was caused by human activities, a view shared by only half of Republican mayors.

Holy Funk. Ninety-five percent of Democratic mayors? That’s not consensus, that’s groupthink at gunpoint. And yet, the number seems plausible. Democrat leaders don’t hold beliefs, they hold scripts. Perhaps if the democratic process didn’t screen for ego and bribery… but half of Republican mayors is a poor showing, too. Democrats want to be Communists and Republicans want to be Democrats.

A clear majority of mayors were prepared to confront President Donald Trump’s administration over climate change and felt their cities could be influential in counteracting the policies of the Republican president, who at times has called global warming a hoax and last year withdrew the U.S. from the Paris climate accord.

Ah, there’s the reason for this survey and article: Trump Derangement Syndrome. Like Las Vegas, the fun never stops and reminds the observer of venereal disease.

“A striking 68 percent of mayors agree that cities should play a strong role in reducing the effects of climate change, even if it means sacrificing revenues or increasing expenditures,” a report accompanying the survey stated.

Hold that thought…

In all, 115 mayors of cities with at least 75,000 residents answered the fourth annual survey named for Thomas Menino, a longtime Democratic mayor of Boston who founded the university program before his death in 2014. The survey was sponsored in part by The Rockefeller Foundation and Citigroup.

Banksters sponsor Trump Derangement Syndrome? Is TDS anything but the Clinton Machine’s self-destruction in the wake of not being able to deliver on its campaign promises? Those demons of Hell can be so uptight about humans keeping their ends of infernal bargains.

Organizers of the survey declined to release a list of the 115 mayors who responded, citing confidentially agreements. …

Okay, but when the survey returns results like “95% of Democrat mayors would burn their cities to stop climate change”, your fig leaf of confidentiality isn’t hiding what you want it to.

The survey cited the availability and affordability of housing as the single most pressing concern of mayors, followed closely by climate change and municipal budget pressures caused in part by federal and state cuts.

That thought you’re holding? Let’s discuss it now. Let’s discuss the possible connections between “cities should play a strong role in reducing the effects of climate change, even if it means sacrificing revenues or inconveniencing residents” and “the most pressing problems of mayors are climate change, budget shortfalls and housing issues”.

Moving on like dot org…

A foreword to the report, signed by Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and Betsy Price, the Republican mayor of Fort Worth, Texas, argued that cities can exert formidable influence over U.S. and global policies.

We can say no to Donald Trump because we’re important city mayors!

“At a time when the national conversation is divisive, cities offer a sense of hope and shared identity,” the mayors said.

Hope and shared identity? I hope that wasn’t Garcetti talking. Los Angeles puts the “balkanization” in “Angels”. It’s a tight fit but behold: Irangeles!

Oh, wait. This is a script change from Hope & Change. What’s wrong, liberals? Did La Raza decide they no longer need Baby Boomer votes?

Sixty-eight percent of mayors said they would be willing to expend additional resources or sacrifice revenue to combat climate change.

But wasn’t a lack of funding a ‘most pressing problem’? This is as tragicomic as an adult with Down’s Syndrome complaining about heartburn and obesity between mouthfuls of triple pepperoni pizza.

Democrats were more than twice as likely as Republicans to promote environmental policies that might inconvenience motorists in their cities, and almost three times as likely to support entering into regional climate pacts or networks. Yet only 26 percent of Democrats and 5 percent of Republican mayors were eager to slap any costly new regulations on the private sector.

You know what the differences is between promoting policies and enacting new regulations? The need for voter approval. Mayors, maybe you shouldn’t be trying to do things that tax-paying voters, given the opportunity, would prohibit.

The survey found that attitudes about climate change differed geographically as well as politically. For example, 90 percent of all Eastern mayors and 97 percent from the Midwest blamed human activities for climate change, compared to 70 percent from Southern cities.

Down here in the Bible Belt, we call climate change “seasons”. Guess we ain’t educated enough to know better… and we don’ wanna be.

Seriously, liberals. First it was nuclear winter. You were proven wrong. Then it was global warming. You were proven wrong. Now it’s climate “change” just so you can’t be proven wrong anymore. You have nothing to offer your constituents but tyranny today so people who don’t exist can enjoy similar tyranny tomorrow.

The Turpin abuse case has been making the news lately. A married couple was discovered torturing, starving and ritually abusing their thirteen children. This obviously proves that homeschooling is a barbaric and cruel practice that warrants state government supervision. A statement from the website of Assemblymember Jose Medina (D-Riverside), https://a61.asmdc.org/press-releases/assemblymember-medinas-statement-13-siblings-held-captive-parents-perris-ca :

.I was very disturbed to learn about the horrific violence that has taken place in our community, and am thankful that these children are now in safety. I am extremely concerned about the lack of oversight the State of California currently has in monitoring private and home schools. I have been in conversation with the Riverside County Office of Education, which agrees that we need to do more to protect our students and validate that they are in safe learning environments. I am looking into introducing a bill this year that would provide a legislative solution and prevent a situation like this from occurring in the future..

Medina is a straight-up Stalinist if he believes the State is more trustworthy with children than a society composed of independent parents. Wretched humans like the Turpins will always happen and when they do, you hang them quickly & publicly and get along with life. What you don’t do is pretend that tranny activists and open pedophiles can do a better job of ensuring kids are protected from predators.

Let’s look at a bill Medina supported regarding foster care reform, SB 731. From the first page of SB 731:

This bill would require children and nonminor dependents in an
out-of-home placement to be placed according to their gender identity,
regardless of the gender or sex listed in their court or child welfare records.
By expanding the duties of counties relating to the placement of foster
children and nonminor dependents, this bill would impose a state-mandated
local program.

Existing law provides that it is the policy of the state that all minors and
nonminors in foster care have specified rights, including, among others, the
right to have fair and equal access to all available services, placement, care,
treatment, and benefits, and to not be subjected to discrimination or
harassment on the basis of actual or perceived race, ethnic group
identification, ancestry, national origin, color, religion, sex, sexual
orientation, gender identity, mental or physical disability, or HIV status.

This bill would additionally specify that all minors and nonminors in
foster care have the right to be placed in out-of-home care according to their
gender identity, regardless of the gender or sex listed in their court or child
welfare records. The bill would require the State Department of Social
Services to adopt regulations consistent with this provision.

Yes, the people who require foster parents to respect the genderqueered whims of sexually immature children are exactly the people to ensure that biological parents are properly monitored for moral conduct. “For the children”, no doubt, and also for the thousands of man-hating feminist voters who need jobs to pay off student debts incurred by studying lesbian pottery.

I have little doubt that Assemblyman, er, Assemblyperson Medina will succeed in regulating homeschooling. The Turpin case will surely be an endless source of relevant emotional feelz. Never mind that this was a unique case rather than a typical example. Big Brother is needed! And Medina has already promised to be Big Brother’s little helper.

But here’s the kicker: the Turpins were not homeschoolers. Per foxnews.com, The address of the home is listed in a California Department of Education directory as the location of the Sandcastle Day School, which opened in 2011 with David Turpin as the principal. Current California policy relies on school employees to report child abuse. That didn’t happen here because there were no school employees. It is suspected by authorities, in fact, that Mr. Turpin registered his home as a school specifically to fly under the radar of social services.

.Private schools are required to register with the state to record their students. exemption from compulsory attendance at public schools,. the California Department of Education told Fox News in a statement. From http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/18/california-house-horrors-case-wake-up-call-for-state-to-toughen-private-school-oversight-lawmaker-says.html

Not to mention, the kids were apparently not educated to the point of knowing who a police officer was. ‘Homeschooler’ and ‘child abuser’ are not synonyms.

Government legislator Jose Medina’s publicly announced, intended milking of a horror story for political gain and the oppression of independent-minded parents says everything about the moral depths America has sunk to.

The following can be found in various spots on the Internet but I couldn’t source the 1976 study. Regardless, sounds right:

“The Inuit’s view of Socipaths: “Kunlangeta is allegedly an Inuit Yupik word for psychopath . in a 1976 study anthropologist Jane M. Murphy, then at Harvard University, found that an isolated group of Yupik-speaking Inuits near the Bering Strait had a term (kunlangeta) they used to describe .a man who . repeatedly lies and cheats and steals things and . takes sexual advantage of many women.someone who does not pay attention to reprimands and who is always being brought to the elders for punishment.” When Murphy asked an Inuit what the group would typically do with a kunlangeta, he replied, .Somebody would have pushed him off the ice when nobody else was looking..”

The common explanation for female sexual preferences is that she’s choosing the fittest lover for her children. However, women are reliably attracted to Dark Triad: narcissists, sociopaths and abusive manipulators. Looking at the most matriarchal of societies–Latino barrios, African tribes and the like–children suffer greatly and end up socially abused. Men aren’t happy with the situation, either. We don’t like working with manipulative selfish types. And the evolutionist himself admits that women seek out Beta Bux because her ‘fittest lover’ doesn’t care about her survival, either.

What are evolutionists thinking? That humanity’s genetically finest are conscienceless predators who abandon their kids and that’s good for the human race? They can’t have it both ways: “Sociopaths are superior humans because they outbreed those who value the health and survival of children.” They square the circle by comparing humans to non-humans either that have children that require no male investment post-sex or that instinctively protect & nurture their young with no need for artificial structure.

Anything to deny the fact that even in primitive human societies, what’s best for healthy families is shoving the “most successful men” off a cliff.

Inspired by https://therationalmale.com/2018/01/10/dangerous-times-part-3/

Rollo has wrapped up a series of good posts “Dangerous Times” with three proposed solutions to unchained female hypergamy & AF/BB:

1. Play the Game better

2. MGTOW

3. Transactional sex

I.d encourage more solutions in the comments. I’m sure a lot of this series seems overly reactionary or disheartening for men who are looking for a return to that stabilizing monogamy. There is an element in the manosphere today who are looking for their Red Pill Trad-Con woman who will police the worst of herself in order to return to the golden era of monogamy. I have my reservations about the real motives of the few women who subscribe to this story, but the issues isn’t about what they will do, but rather what they can do in a feminine-primary social order that allows them to renege on their convictions without consequence.

Those are all good solutions for specific contexts but clearly don’t provide a lasting, society-wide solution. That solution is holding two beliefs simultaneously:

4a. Women are naturally like that.

4b. Women are not supposed to be like that.

The Churchians deny the first belief; PUAs, the second. Accepting both at once is unpleasant because this binary solution is how morality comes into existence, bridging the gap from the first to the second.